this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
124 points (94.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43516 readers
1377 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My thoughts is that it's a simple situation really. If they're harassing or assaulting people, the women will call the cops or something, simple situation and get the guy arrested. If he's not doing anything, it's nothing harmful. Apparently that's not a solid enough answer. What should I have said?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 2 points 28 minutes ago* (last edited 26 minutes ago)

i've understood that coed bathrooms have existed in various places in the country long before republicans decided they were going to create a campaign against transgender people using restrooms. Grow up. Everyone poops!

[โ€“] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

You should have said โ€œHow is that not a solid enough answer?โ€

[โ€“] No1@aussie.zone 13 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

What should I have said?

"Wow, sadly I think it means that person has some serious mental issues, and we should get them some help.

Are you feeling okay? Do you want me to call someone for you?"

[โ€“] superkret@feddit.org 124 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

What should I have said?

"You think about strange men's genitals a lot, don't you?"

[โ€“] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

Depends how likely an actual productive conversation was. It's not an invalid question without context. With the typical coconuts, yeah maybe just embarrass them.

[โ€“] otp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

typical coconut

...? Brown on the outside, white on the inside? Like a white-washed Indian person?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] lettruthout@lemmy.world 36 points 9 hours ago

Or... "You seem to want to talk about sex a lot. Is everything OK at home?"

[โ€“] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 11 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

The argument made by the person asking that question is not based on any realistic fear they have actually thought through. On the big list of gendered violence, a cis dude saying they are trans to accomplish... being present in a bathroom without themselves getting harrassed... doesn't even register.

Instead, this is just a typical attempt to punch down based on an imagined danger, usually on someone else's behalf. There's nothing an oppressor likes more than a piece of illogic that frames their target of oppression as, sneakily, the real oppressor. In this case, it is trans people wanting bathroom access without having to out themselves or to otherwise just not contradict their gender. Gender neutral bathrooms would also be acceptable, or even better, but cis people have insisted on gendered bathrooms. Rather than say, "yeah trans people shouldn't have to put up with that cis bathroom bullshit", reactionaries try to come up with ways to reframe the ask as its own form of oppression. This is also the mainstay of TERFs, basically just cis women that pretend trans women are oppressing them by wanting basic equal consideration.

Depending on who this person is, you may want to try various tactics. If you think you can be flippant and dismissive of them, definitely do that preferentiallu. Make them feel like they are being ridiculous and that if they really care about violence against women they should work on guaranteeing housing for all and hate cops. If you can't be flippant, I recommend still not taking it seriously but just changing the subject to the actual act of oppression and telling them more or less what I said in previous paragraphs. All of this assumes this us a person whose mind you want to change, like that of a friend or family member. If it is a colleague, start documenting their transphobuc comments and see if anyone else has your concerns, get their documentation as well. If it is just some rando, just tell them to shut the fuck up with bad faith transphobia and move on.

[โ€“] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 11 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Its an ancient argument and your answer is correct.

There is no cock check at restroom doors anyone can enter.

Wish there was.

Can't tell you how many times I've went through the embarassment of realizing I left mine at home halfway through a piss.

"Trans people aren't super-sayajins so existing assault laws are probably fine"

[โ€“] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The time for debating conservatives was over a decade ago. The time for debate is over. Now is the time to dethrone them. Marginalize hate by marginalizing the haters.

[โ€“] howrar@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 hours ago

We're assuming that you're talking to someone who's willing to have a discussion in good faith.

You'd first need to know why that isn't a sufficiently solid answer. Are they looking for a perfect solution? Because I'm pretty sure there isn't one. What we want is an improvement over the status quo, and sometimes an overall improvement necessitates a worse experience in certain areas.

[โ€“] zoostation@lemmy.world 150 points 9 hours ago (10 children)

Is there a magical barrier that keeps men who don't say they're trans from entering women's bathrooms?

[โ€“] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 46 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

It's quite interesting to see them make this argument while also claiming that gun control laws can't possibly work because criminals won't abide by them.

[โ€“] otp@sh.itjust.works 31 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

I guess we need to allow everyone to use any washroom because we need a good man in the women's washroom to be around to save the women from a bad man in the women's washroom

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 74 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

A fictitious rapist can only enter women's bathrooms for raping purposes if they loudly declare that they are trans.

[โ€“] zoostation@lemmy.world 34 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Oh I see, it's like bankruptcy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Yeah, this is probably the right way to go. There's actually no bathroom police, for most people. It's an issue in the first place because when someone is trans people will deputise themselves just to harass them.

load more comments (7 replies)
[โ€“] pezmaker@sh.itjust.works 106 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Nothing, they're not genuinely interested in a discussion. They're just trying to pin you with a bad answer and will keep moving the goal post until they think they gotcha.

[โ€“] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 31 points 9 hours ago

This. โ˜๏ธ

It's best to ignore them. There's no use getting into an argument with someone who's disingenuous to start with.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 51 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

What public bathroom has dedicated security gaurds? Theres nothing stopping a man from just walking in without having to make stuff up. If someone is acting inappropriate in a public restroom then why does it matter whats in their pants? Gay/lesbian perverts exist too!

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 49 points 9 hours ago (7 children)

Nothing.

Nothing is good enough. Gendered bathrooms are about repression. That's why they are so mad about non-gendered toilets that are popping up.

[โ€“] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 47 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

This has always confused me for years since this "debate" became part of public dialog.

Why don't we just have all non-gender bathrooms? A friend of mine used to live in an apartment building where the common area had 4 non-gendered bathrooms.

Each had a fold-out changing table, a single toilet, and a sink, so everybody was accommodated. Men, women, non-binary, trans folks, a parent with their baby or young child, and disabled people because the door was wide enough for a wheelchair and the toilets had support bars next to them.

Fully inclusive to everybody, and nicer than the typical restrooms because they were totally private.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 23 points 9 hours ago (7 children)

So all restrooms should be gender free?

[โ€“] lukecooperatus@lemmy.ml 46 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes. (Or rather, gender neutral.)

[โ€“] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 8 points 9 hours ago

It would be cheaper to build actual walls in restrooms than to double their size systematically

[โ€“] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 26 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

Yeah. All private ones are already.

load more comments (6 replies)
[โ€“] Zak@lemmy.world 24 points 9 hours ago

When I try to recall the few non-gendered public bathrooms I've been in, they all had private stalls with real doors. It was nice. I'd be happy if all public bathrooms were like that.

[โ€“] troed@fedia.io 14 points 9 hours ago

Yes. A room with a bunch of stalls and sinks.

European type stalls that is, floor to ceiling, real doors.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[โ€“] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 38 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I don't get why we have different bathrooms at this point. Its more efficient to just have them all be family bathrooms with floor to ceiling stalls.

[โ€“] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 38 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Was at a brewery last night where the "bathroom" was a row of sinks, and then a row of doors labeled "sit" or "stand". The commode cubicles were full length walls and doors, totally private, and this just makes so much more sense to me

[โ€“] Okokimup@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago

Was at a church yard sale yesterday and they had the same setup. Pretty sure it was not a progressive church.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] morgan_423@lemmy.world 34 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Why are conservatives so worried about hypothetical scenarios involving gendering re: restrooms?

It's come up exactly zero times ever in my entire lifespan, and I'm in my mid 40s now and have been in hundreds, if not thousands, of public restrooms.

[โ€“] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Literally the only times I have EVER seen it was when I was at concert and a woman came in and exclaimed that the line was too long for the women's. I have never once seen a man go into a womens room

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] bizarroland@fedia.io 33 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I am a straight guy and I have used a woman's restroom.

But only in the context that it was a single restroom and the men's was occupied. I just unilaterally executed my male privilege and declared that the woman's restroom was unisex for the time period that I needed it.

There was nobody else in the room and if there had been first the door would have been locked or I would have been absolutely mortified.

[โ€“] socsa@piefed.social 14 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

This was super common in college dorms as well. The etiquette was that if your hookup or friend was using the bathroom on your floor you were supposed to stand outside and let people know about it. You know, informed consent and all. Absolutely zero people ever gave a shit.

The entire fear kind of makes me assume that all conservatives are just opportunistic rapists who are kept in check my the thinnest veneer of social order.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] Icalasari@fedia.io 32 points 8 hours ago

"Counter question: What stops a creep from doing that even if there was an anti trans law?"

[โ€“] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 20 points 9 hours ago

You made a mistake.

You engaged with someone that wasn't asking in good faith. The idea itself is so stupid that snagging engaging with it isn't worth the time and effort.

The only useful response to that question is "are you really that stupid, or do you think I am?"

[โ€“] Dkarma@lemmy.world 15 points 3 hours ago

"in your biased example the fact that the person is trans isn't relevant to anything...what's your point?"

[โ€“] velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml 15 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

That's a false dichotomy. Perverts of any gender and inclination can do harmful stuff anywhere. In an idealistic world, a bathroom shouldn't have to be gendered, because all that you're doing is relieving yourself - I mean, look at your own homes first. Putting the gender-neutral stuff aside, this isn't about trans-women, this is about men who are perverts. Even if things such as cross-dressing, gender-changing surgeries or trans-women were non-existent/erased in a hypothetical world, these perverts will find other ways to violate or harass women.

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ