this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
719 points (89.0% liked)

Malicious Compliance

19484 readers
699 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dystop@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

hah, this one is funny!

Also, echoing @Imotali@lemmy.world's comment below (unfortunately you can't sticky comments on lemmy): comments that express hate towards any group are a violation of instance guidelines. BE NICE.

[–] vis4valentine@lemmy.ml 173 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

This happens when transphobes forgets that trans men exists lol.

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 year ago

I'd love to ~~watch~~ forcefeed them a plate of their, "you will always be a woman" words.

[–] Skellybones@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They exist? Thought they were a fairytale

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] krayj@lemmy.world 116 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think it would have been fair to have a rule saying "no surgical modifications"... because doing things like facelift, nose-job, breast/buttox implants, cheek lifts, wrinkle removal, etc, are obviously unfair advantages (in a beauty contest) for those who have the money pay for it; and having a generic blanket rule like that would have accomplished the same thing they were trying to accomplish without being so blatantly transphobic... so a rule like what they have only proves that they are both despicable AND dumb. The entire notion of beauty pageants is outdated and stupid if you ask me.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Lol, you implement that and basically all beauty pageants stop existing. Which would be a good thing, mind you. But I've never met a pageant contestant in my life that isn't … let's say … heavily enhanced by medical procedures.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think it would have been fair to have a rule saying “no surgical modifications”…

How are you intending to prove that that? Only the bad surgery makes itself obvious.

[–] krayj@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Like any kind of contest, finding rules violations is hard and not foolproof. It's like sports that forbid using steroids - competitors do regularly take those substances while training, then quit taking them for competition and go uncaught. Competitors who are discovered later to have been violating rules are stripped of titles.

That said, I don't think it's a very controversial concept that a beauty pageant shouldn't be a contest about who could afford the best surgeons. Well - as I said earlier I think beauty pageants are absurd to begin with, but if they have to exist I don't think it should be a contest between surgeons.

[–] Deuces@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Though I would watch one that was a contest between surgeons. I imagine it'd start pretty tame, but the first time a girl with cat ears wins, were only like 5 years from the really crazy shit

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (23 children)

On the one hand, that might work. On the other hand, who gives a fuck about the rules in a contest with arbitrary standards?

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago (21 children)

I mean... it's supposed to be a 'beauty contest' so why shouldn't they compete?

[–] Neve8028@lemm.ee 57 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's funny because the original trans sports bans were justified by saying that they would have an unfair advantage. This beauty pageant ban is just transphobes saying that trans women are unfairly attractive lmfao.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're either fabulous or you're not. Has nothing to do with what's in between your legs at birth or beyond.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What if I have a fabulous dick, but the rest of me is blah?

[–] Afghaniscran@feddit.uk 21 points 1 year ago

No need to brag to those of us whose entirety is eurgh

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You enter your dick into a beauty pageant, of course.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

For context, Miss Italia is no longer broadcasted on important tv channels and almost no one watches or care about who wins now. Years ago (10?) it was a big thing and winners would make commercials and do movies/series and be remembered for life. But it’s too an old school concept now

Anyway, I love this turn of events

Source: Italian

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] eggvng@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Elia Bonci, who also spoke to la Repubblica, said: “I took courage, used my deadname and signed up for Miss Italy because fighting transphobia is intersectional and even though I’m not a trans woman, I’ve decided to fight for their rights.”

much respect to all that followed!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Cis guy here. Based mod.

[–] lemonflavoured@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Clever way of protesting it.

Agree. They can't reject them without exposing their transphobia

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 27 points 1 year ago

This is deliciously rich. They really painted themselves into a corner with that one!

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hope he wins. That'd be really funny.

[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Imagine a buff, bearded person that identifies as male wins in a contest that measures female beauty

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gerryflap@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Absolute chads. I'm curious what kind of response this is going to get.

[–] tenitchyfingers@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (23 children)

YES. This is EXACTLY what I’ve been saying!!! Like honestly, as a cis woman from Italy I’m so embarrassed by this nonsense. Like, cutting trans women out of the competition at this moment just means people are recognizing that trans women are “unfairly” more good looking than cis women. Which, personally, is true in my case but you don’t see me bitching about it. Fuck yeah trans dudes, trans chicks and non-binary buddies.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] wanderingmagus@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for everything you do to keep this community safe. I know it can't be easy.

[–] Imotali@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

idk, I just got to yeet like at least a handful of transphobes into oblivion so.... was pretty fun.

[–] BewilderedBeast@mander.xyz 16 points 1 year ago

It's important to find work that also nourishes your soul.

[–] flyingjake@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago

This is fantastic, while having them obviously in drag is delicious, it would be even more stark if some of them present as traditional male too and really bring the point home.

[–] macintosh@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Uhhh???? Based??????????

[–] Pixlbabble@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Beauty Pageants are uglyphobic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FReddit@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'd be more interested in protesting the fact that it's now legal to grope women in Italy.

The landmark decision involved a school janitor who jammed his hand into a 17 year old girl's panties.

Pick the hill you want to die on.

[–] Imotali@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Both. I choose both.

[–] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm sure they care about both of those things.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›