this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
279 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18850 readers
4622 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former U.S. Ambassador to Israel David Friedman writes in new book that U.S. support for Israeli sovereignty is ‘based first and foremost on biblical prophecies and values’

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 131 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Tell me again how both sides are the same?

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 74 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's why I'm voting for Jizz Stein hur hur!

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Same here, because when everybody is against us, and don''t give a fuck about Palestinian genocide, I can't vote for Harris who is only partially on our side.
My logic is flawless. I will now go ahead and shoot my other foot.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

"You'll respect my choices and wishes like i accept yours, right? RIGHT?!??!?!?!" - Enlightened Stein voter.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course I will, just don't expect me to be able to help you when they come for you, because you helped vote the leopards into power.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, trust me, I know. I was just poking fun and quoting a particular user on here who goes around using this same logic while attacking other's views and then victimizing him/herself whenever he/she remotely gets any resistance.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I understand it was sarcasm. You wrote enlightened Stein voter, that can ONLY be a joke. So don't worry.
I've seen similar comments, that are absolutely insane from people supporting Gaza.
My response however, was meant for those who actually believe there's a better third option.

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 10 points 1 week ago

My response to this is "I respect your right to vote. Why don't you?"

[–] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

I swear there's a weirdo Jill Stein supporter who always shows up on Lemmy threads and says nearly that exact comment. Like hell no I don't respect your wack choice.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It's funny because we all know exactly who that is, too. Of course trying to use "respect" in both the sense of "respecting their right" and also "not (correctly) calling them a dumbass every time."

[–] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah she made a PLEDGE to stop war in Palestine!

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Well, both sides want to end the genocide. One by gently asking Israel to negotiate a ceasefire, the other by urging Israel to finish the job.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When one of those sides completely defunded UNRWA they are the same, When one of those sides keeps providing weapons and money to slaughter Palestinians, they are the same. When Biden and Harris are providing those weapons and money to Israel they are allowing Netanyahu to 'finish the job'

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lol you have to preemptively use Donald's quote because you know which party is worse and don't want your campaigning on Donald's behalf to get interrupted with facts or anything of the sort. The topic of the article is what you want to happen. Monstrous.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm using Trump's quote because liberals quote it while ignoring their team is finishing the job.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're using Donald's quote to pretend Dems are as bad as the guy you're campaigning on behalf of.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dems are as bad, I'm not campaigning for Trump. If I'm saying Dems are as bad as Republicans, Republicans must be pretty damn bad. That's isn't the typical endorsement of support from someone.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

If you're saying Dems are as bad as Repubs you are either delusional or deliberately disregarding reality. Of course it is the latter, since you are on here campaigning for Donald every day.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Both sides"-ers in shambles

[–] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Doubt it. They seem pretty comfortable swimming in wilful ignorance.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I agree with you but pedantically that seems to imply they are still ignorant of the reality. I don't believe that for a second.

[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Im saving this post in case some smoothbrain goes "bOtH sIdEs" again, or just to annoy the grifters a little...

I have been telling everyone about trumps wonderful pogroms for the palestinian people and finally the news recognizes it.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wonder - and I mean this seriouslyand not in an /s way - what happens, if you object "bOth SiDeS" with "Why not vote for Harris then?"?
Surely you won't convince a Trumpologist this way.
But doesn't that also give leeway to present voting for Harris as equally good choice in the eyes of Trumpologists?

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Because they either value virtue signaling over actual change, or are just spreading propaganda.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Option A:

"I couldn't possibly do even a single action that would make me even slightly complicit in the genocide from either side," while spending all day campaigning for everyone to vote the same way as MAGAs want them to, "in fact, the Dems are so far right that they are literally indistinguishable from theocratic authoritarians promising to deliver a dictatorship."

Option B:

"Well, he cannot do worse than this," regarding a guy who blasted Yemen and wants to "finish the job" in Gaza, "and this will force the Dems to move left to get voters next election, after voting is abolished, they certainly won't move rightward looking for people who will actually vote."

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He wants to make Palestine a territory of Israel’s, like Puerto Rico is to the US. The rub is, the powers in Israel just want to wipe out the Palestinians, so I doubt they will like this plan.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 week ago

Fuckin' psycho.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Good ole religion. Let's end the world so our beloved Jeebus comes out of his fucking fox hole. Why can't he just come out of it without so much pain ~~amd~~ and suffering to innocent people? What a fucking asshole if he were real?

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The loving Jesus depicted in the New Testament would be shot, hung, or even re-crucified by his followers if he dared show up and open his mouth. He ain't coming back.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The Baha'is believe he already came and went. World ended in 1844, a new one replaced it.

Just like the world ended around 4500 BCE when The Green Sahara period and the Bronze Age Collapse happened within 200 years of each other, and some scared ass Jews wrote the Torah, inventing their entire history out of the ruins of Egypt, despite never having been there.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

This is an Onion article, right?

. . .

Right