Buffalox

joined 1 year ago
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

This serves as a great reminder that Tim Walz is……

I think you mean human being. If it's a mistake it's not an attempt to deceit like is kind of implied by reminding us he is a politician.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Contemporaneous news reports in Nebraska indicated that Mr. Walz was still in his home state during the spring and did not leave for China until August.

That doesn't sound like certainty to me. So how strong are those indications?
Maybe Walz remembers it wrong, the incident would still be very recent, and the warning sincere about not going to mainland.
But it could also be he remembers correctly, and the "indications" are wrong.

No matter which, it doesn't really matter if it was 2 months later or not. It was definitely at around that time.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The comment was:

Daily reminder that religion is a monstrous evil.

And you wrote:

Religion is not necessary...

That's the definition of whataboutism.

Do note that religion only ever seems to be a problem when it’s conservative or authoritarian

Religions claim authority and are authoritarian by definition, religion is extremely harmful just by the fact that it preaches immortality. You also don't need to be conservative to believe in faith healing. There may be few exceptions to the rule, but by far the most religions contain these harmful doctrines.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

So are the settlers civilians? Or are they part of an invasion?
I tend towards the latter.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

180 missiles is A LOT. It takes a very strong air defense to resist that.
It's bigger than the biggest Russian missile attack on Ukraine! Where an attack by Russia with 158 missiles and drones combined caused 31 dead:
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-launches-massive-air-attack-ukraine-least-10-dead-kyiv-2023-12-29/
31 dead and drones are way easier to shoot down than missiles.

This looks to me like a very serious attempt by Iran to penetrate Israeli air defenses.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Because it is a legal question,

I don't get it, you wrote: " it will stay supervised", even though we've seen numerous cases where it was not. It just doesn't make sense, because it's contrary to reality. Disregarding it is illegal. But because it's illegal it would make sense to write it MUST stay supervised.
But then there's the matter of Mercedes FSD that is actually legal!

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

If they have fired hundreds of missiles, it's clearly an attempt to overwhelm Israeli air defense.
Of course assuming the reporting we receive is true.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Israel is a failed experiment.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

That is 3 AM or 03:00 Central european time or Paris mean time.
https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/est-to-cet-converter

We bought Beer and snacks, looking forward to Walz walzing all over Vance. 🍺🍺😀

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Exactly, but more than that, they both ignore(d) testing, that showed it wasn't safe!!!

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

I think you need to religiously hold an ideology to die or kill for it.
The only form of ideology that is always religious is religion.

Also your post is whataboutism.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Ideological cause.

 

AOC speech at the 2024 Democratic National Convention

 

Russia has launched an offensive into the Kharkiv region, and it has created a lot of alarmist news reports. In reality it is difficult to see what Russia's plan is, and it is not self-evident that it is a smart use of resources. In this video I discuss whether we might be seeing a return to the fragmented command structures that Russia had in the beginning of the war.

-1
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Buffalox@lemmy.world to c/android@lemmy.world
 

My old $200 Motorola G9 Power phone lasted almost 4 years with only very minor scratches. Obviously in that period I have dropped it a few times getting out of the car, where the phone sometimes work itself out of my pant pocket while I drive, and then it slips out when I get out of the car. But no problem on my previous phones, despite the Moto had cheap Panda glass front.

Then I bought my $800 glass back Xiaomi 13T Pro in January, and I loved the phone for the camera and good specs. But alas after only 4 months, and single drop of just 30 cm while sitting on the porch, the glass back immediately cracked! The back now looks like an ugly mess, and the high water resistance is very likely gone too.

For sure the last time I buy a phone with a glass back!!!

I wonder why glass back is so popular, and I curse the media for reviewing the Samsung Galaxy S2 as "feeling a bit cheap", because the back was synthetic, and drop tests showed it was 10 times as durable as the iPhone with its glass back.

Samsung did it right in the beginning, glass backs are a curse.

PS: I don't use condoms for my phones, if they need that for daily use, it's an obvious design flaw!!!

The glass back is supposedly there to give a premium feel to the phone. But because it's fragile, people have to use a cover, but with the cover, the premium feel of a glass back is gone anyways?
How is glass back not a design flaw?

EDIT FOR CLARIFICATION:

I am not clumsy, that's why I believe the phone should be able to last without cover. This was the first time the phone slid out of my packet, and I've NEVER dropped it out of my hands. One 30 cm slip and it's broken. Where for instance my Moto had maybe 4-6 in all over the years, and remained unscathed, apart from some tiny scratches.
The sliding out of pocket does occur maybe a couple of times per year, but it's a low drop, and the phone should absolutely be able to handle that tiny drop, as it's an item for everyday use.
I've also never had problems with scratches on my screen on any phone, which is the reason people use screen protectors I guess, which I don't either, because they are ugly, for instance they create a tiny ring around the camera, and they feel awful IMO, my phone came with it, and it took exactly 10 seconds for me to decide to remove it, because I could feel the edge of the screen protector when using the phone.
But please stop with the dropping my phone regularly comments! Just because I dropped my Moto a few times (slid out of pocket) over almost 4 years! Always from low height, which it should be able to handle a few times.

 

Profits were expected to be halved from the 2022 1.2 tn Rubles, but instead they made a loss in 2023 of 629bn Rubles or £5.5bn.

 

It used to be very convenient that when searching for something that had a geographic location, Google searches used to show a small map which linked to Google maps when pressed.
Now all I get i a tiny useless map, that doesn't have any of the feature of Google maps, and often I don't even get that.
Anyone know why that is? And if there is a fix?
I use Firefox, but I'm guessing it's independent of browser, unless Google is up to their shenanigans again.
I've added Google maps as search option, which luckily is dead easy in Firefox to do. At the same time I added Open Street Map, to minimize Google map use to maybe show them they are losing traffic.

EDIT:

I think this is the reason as u/garrett@lemm.ee writes:

If you’re in Europe, it may be due to the DMA.

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/pixels/article/2024/03/06/digital-markets-act-how-the-way-you-use-google-maps-and-messenger-is-changing_6591969_13.html

You may also have noticed something new on Google, when looking for the address of a place: It’s now impossible to click on the map that appears in your search results.

Google is one of the “gatekeepers” according to the DMA (Digital Markets Act). The law recently went into effect. It is supposed to lessen the amount of preferential treatment the big tech companies give themselves.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Markets_Act

view more: next ›