this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
484 points (99.8% liked)

News

22987 readers
3697 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“It is damning that here in California, where abortion care is a constitutional right, we have a hospital implementing a policy that’s reminiscent of heartbeat laws in extremist red states,” Attorney General Rob Bonta said.

A Catholic hospital in Northern California is facing a lawsuit by the state’s attorney general after it reportedly refused to perform an abortion on a woman whose pregnancy was not viable and whose life was in danger.

Anna Nusslock was already in severe crisis when she and her husband Daniel arrived last February at Providence St. Joseph Hospital in Eureka, according to the suit, which AG Rob Bonta filed Monday in Humboldt County Superior Court. A doctor examined Nusslock, who was 15 weeks pregnant with twins, and told her they would not survive, the suit explains.

Without a dilation and evacuation procedure, or, what is commonly known as "an abortion," Nusslock was also at risk of death, the complaint contends.

However, it goes on, “Providence refused to allow Anna’s doctors to treat her, as the hospital’s policies prohibited them from terminating a pregnancy so long as they could detect fetal heart tones. The only exception was if the mother’s life was at immediate risk, a high threshold that Anna apparently did not yet reach. Only at some poorly defined point in the future, when Anna was close enough to death, would Providence permit her doctors to intervene. Until then, Anna and her physicians could do nothing but wait, worry, and hope.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 42 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (3 children)

Hospitals should not be owned religious institutions. Here is a general reminder to anyone who has a Primary Care at a Catholic or Christian hospital. If you have an alternative hospital that supports the full spectrum of reproductive health, then leave the religious zealot hospital and tell them why.

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 3 points 45 minutes ago

People should also be aware that not all catholic hospitals are open about being catholic. In some areas they are buying up smaller practices and entire hospitals but keeping it's previous name so it's confusing and harder to avoid them.

[–] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm in Arkansas. Non religious hospitals exist?

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

For you? No.

For other people? Sometimes.

[–] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 3 points 54 minutes ago
[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

This is my take. They're pretty much a business.

Catholic colleges too. They're making money AND taking public funds.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

Businesses with a religious dogma that makes victims out of people for needing healthcare.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

supreme court gonna allow this deadly nonsense and turn hospitals into religious death panels.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

I heard this on the radio and they were calling the hospital Providence, I didn't even know it was Catholic.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 79 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Religion kills more people than all other causes combined. Abolish religion.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

I don't actually think that's even close to true.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Yeah, I have to agree it's basically assuredly not true, even when accounting for:

  • Wars, genocides, and individual people killed over religion.
  • Suicides linked to religious abuse by institutions and by zealots.
  • Religion stifling the advancement of medicine such as in the case of stem cell research.
  • The brand of "god's will" bullshit that leads to preventable deaths in lieu of treatment.

Undoubtedly religion is hugely harmful, and I'm its biggest detractor that I personally know, but we live in an era where heart disease and cancer exist. Even saying religion causes a plurality of deaths would be wrong; "more than all others combined" is bullshit on a level that I can't believe it got so many upvotes.

We can say that religion results in a fuckload of unnecessary deaths without lying.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

So what about the hundreds of years where medical science was banned from studying the body. Where they had to steal corpses and learn in secrecy. How many deaths from cancer and heart disease could have prevented had we not been stifled.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

We are still banned from studying stem cells to a degree or using them for cures if they came from a fetus. Religion is still preventing medical advancement for no reason.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I've been thinking about this for a minute, and I think a good standard here is making a list of (relatively) non-overlapping causes of death that have claimed over a billion human lives.

Infectious disease is almost certainly at least one entry on this list, primarily secular war as well, starvation/famine probably a few times over, cancer and heart disease are probably distinct entries, and death attempting to grow/hunt food. I suspect deaths by religion could be on that list as well, but it's the entry I'm least confident in.

In every sense of the word, this is a bad list to be on, but I don't think religion is near the biggest culprit on the list, even if you do a lot of special pleading, and group all deaths by religious cause together, but split each disease, war, etc up for some reason.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 23 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If heart disease and cancer are god's will, it counts. /s

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I’m pretty sure they mean human-caused catastrophes. Although if we count meat consumption as a sort of quasi-religious behavior then maybe you’re right.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

They are referring to the violence and wars committed over religion.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm aware, and I stand by what I said.

Estimates place death from all wars since recorded history at 1.1 billion. I'll grant you a bone and say religion has been responsible for an additional 2 billion deaths through any other means throughout all of history.

Mosquito borne diseases are estimated to have killed 52 billion people throughout history.

Original comment said religion killed more than all other causes put together. That's just simply not true.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Cause in the context above would probably be ideological. So the meaning is compared to other forms of ideology or other reasons for people to kill each other. Not natural disaster or diseases. Because obviously most people die from natural causes, and are not killed.

The original quote that was probably thought of is:
George Carlin: "More people have been killed in the name of God than for any other reason"

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Which is like 95% of all war. Mein Kampf mentions god literally dozens of times. No secular democracies have ever gone to war with each other, and virtually all autocratic regimes are religious.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

id imagine its heart disease, and malaria

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Ideological cause.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

There's SO many causes of heart disease, many of which are exacerbated and sometimes even caused by religion.

Besides, if you're religious enough to be a creationist, it stands to reason (to use the least appropriate word possible) that you believe ALL misery was created by your deity, including malaria.

[–] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I religion is shit, but mosquitoes (and the myriad of illnesses they transmit) have killed more humans than humans have.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Mosquitos were created by Satan himself.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 70 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Faith is less than nothing when weighed against observable, measurable fact. Religion should never be allowed to overrule science.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

If faith is all you have, you have less than nothing.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 31 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I believe in freedom of religion, but if your religion prohibits you from the practice of medicine, you are not allowed to have a hospital. Jehovah's Witnesses and Scientologists don't have hospitals either.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

if your religion prohibits you from the practice of medicine, you are not allowed to have a hospital.

That should be obvious, but to the religious it's apparently not.

Freedom of religion is an overused term, to allow special treatment for religion.
Religions should have no more rights than ideology, because they are nothing more.
They should have no more protection against discrimination than ideology, because they are nothing more.
That means a harmful religion can be banned, and it is NOT discrimination but civilization.
We have freedom of thought, but religion should not have priority or privileges over other types of thought.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 21 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Religion is like your dick: keep it to yourself in public, only share it with the consent of others, and you're solely responsible for any consequences arising from its use.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago

And you especially keep it away from children.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

Nearly all our hospitals are run by church folk, so their beliefs are applied to all patients. Certain elective or life saving procedures alike have seen this story in some form.

[–] Regna@lemmy.world 37 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

At least they had compassionate nurses…

Painted into a corner, the Nusslocks were forced to drive to a nearby facility that was not bound by religious restriction — but not before a nurse at Providence handed them a bucket and some towels “in case something happens in the car.”

[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Our healthcare system is so efficient that after a hospital refuses to provide care thanks to religious nutjobs, the at-risk patient has to take a bucket and a towel and drive themselves to another hospital instead of being taken by an ambulance with actual medical personnel. Maybe they were just 10 grand short of being able to afford it.

Holy fuck.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

"Oh, you said abortion. I thought you said a bucket. My bad."

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 31 points 4 hours ago (8 children)

Daily reminder that religion is a monstrous evil.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 24 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think to call yourself a hospital the law should require them to adhere to medical science, not a religious belief. If they want to be religion first, and medical second, then they should be a private clinic that is labeled as such so people know they are not going to get the full hospital medical care one would expect from an institution calling itself a hospital.

[–] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 7 points 3 hours ago

We should have a law that keeps religious organizations from receiving Medicaid and Medicare reimbursements. That would stop this shit real quick.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 20 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Freedom of religion my ass.
Religion is harmful and dangerous, and should absolutely be required to follow the law at the very minimum.
Otherwise it cannot be acknowledged in a civilized society. And should not only lose tax benefits, but be outlawed.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 hours ago

"Freedom of religion" at this point is a relic from when literally everyone was severely delusional. Religion and voting is like drinking and driving.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

One of the worse parts is that they may soon have the only delivery ward in their area.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 4 points 19 minutes ago

Religion is politics is ridiculous, religion in healthcare is just beyond unacceptable and completely fucked up

load more comments
view more: next ›