yeahiknow3

joined 7 months ago
[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 5 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Anyone “logging” the rainforest deserves to immediately contribute to the nitrogen cycle. No questions asked.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s not hard to encrypt messages ffs.

It is if you’re a boomer in charge of the government and apparently news websites. The internet is a series of tubes.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wish you were right, but you’re not. Internet providers have monopolies because the cost of laying fiber or launching satellites is so high. That’s precisely what the argument over net neutrality has been about.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The podcaster is a brainless douchebag who interviews everyone and expresses no opinion. When I say brainless, I mean he might actually have been lobotomized. Lex has no character, personality, or principles. Just a goofy smile and lots of money.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

No one deserves to be stripped of the right to exist.

for some crimes, death penalty is too mild...

So… death penalty is wrong, but evil people deserve to be tortured?

I have to say, this is the most unphilosophical and internally contradictory view on this topic I’ve heard so far. Well done.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Do you have any idea how eagerly AT&T and Comcast would block half the internet if they had the tiniest profit motive to do so? I wonder how long left wing websites would remain online if it weren’t illegal for multinational corporations to block them.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

That’s an arbitrary metric. What about internet across oceans, or across forests? Blocking content is a question of why and what. Shouldn’t we be able to block child exploitation websites? That is to say, of course we can, and it’s very easy. The only question is whether you want that kind of censorship to be up to your service provider or your government.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 17 points 5 days ago (5 children)

To be fair, most of them were Republicans. God works in mysterious ways.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world -4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

There is absolutely no deontological duty to pander to identitarians and cry-bullies.

view more: next ›