chuckleslord

joined 1 year ago
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Nope. Federal law is binding in all 50 states

🀑🀑🀑

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Wasn't this a part of "Sorry to Bother You"? Fucked up

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

TERF to Alt-Right pipeline be real

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Lots of people vote against their own interest. Do you think black people incapable of doing so?

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I mean... that's the Evangelical plan for Israel. They want their death cult to reach its culmination

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Limit of knowledge, no Google. Quaid was likely an adult when he starred in The Hunger Games. That came out 15 or so years ago, so if guess he's mid 30s.

Edit: 32. Not bad

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Butt-clenching. All my money on butt-clenching

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Can't. I get way too invested in this shit and its bad for my mental health.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Jeremy. You need to focus right now. Mrs. Cuddlesworth will kill you if she thinks you're here. There's only one way out. Time to put those mirroring exercises from theater camp to good use.

 

Before downvoting, check the community.

If you fail to use the /s tag or specifically call out that your comment is sarcastic, I'm going to treat it as being earnest. I might ask if you're being sarcastic, but I will downvote as though you are being earnest.

The /s tag not only clarifies, but it also confirms that you're being sarcastic. A thing you cannot ordinarily convey via written text unless you specifically call it out. You can hint at it, readers can infer it, but you cannot convey it. To convey it, sans directly stating it, you would need to include a recording of you speaking the comment, which defeats the whole point of text chats.

"It definitely reads as sarcasm, you're just missing it" So what? I'm neurodivergent. I barely get this shit in its normal, spoken context. Why should I be expected to understand the implied sarcasm in your text comment?

"Telling someone you're being sarcastic ruins it" Unless your definition of sarcasm is just lying to someone's face, you do indicate sarcasm when speaking. Via the exaggerated, deadpan tone you use. Something you can't convey in written text unless you specifically call it out.

"I made it very clear via hyperbole that it was sarcasm" Have you talked to people? Your obvious, over-the-top, hyperbolic sarcasm could just be someone's opinion taken whole cloth. In fact, you probably modeled your exaggeration AFTER a person. Can you see why, if I don't know you, there's no way to tell?

"I forgot the tag" cool, if I see the edit adding it back in, I'll revert my downvote. Consider it the opportunity cost of forgetting.

"It doesn't hurt anyone" Yes, it does. You give credence to your exaggerated position that you would never take because the people who think like that exaggerated position will point to your comment as proof that they have support. It's why 4chan rebirthed nazism.

"I still won't do it". Then have fun with the downvote. You want to make the internet worse? I'll be sure that you don't get the internet points your brain craves.

view more: next β€Ί