this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
272 points (94.7% liked)

politics

19097 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 107 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MTG is known for her extra-marital affairs which got her divorced.

It’s literally always projection with these losers.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Eww, there's multiple people who want to have sex with MTG‽

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Shes rich. Handed some construction buisness by her parents/grandparents. Apprently also owned the gym where most of the people she was fucking worked out.

So like most shitty people : money.

[–] milkjug@lemmy.wildfyre.dev 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 22 points 1 year ago

That's not a kink, that's a cry for help.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hate both of these cunts, but what's wrong with having bunches of sex? It's not like Boebert is married.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 92 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You're not supposed to enjoy sex if you're a Republican.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

You’re not supposed to enjoy sex if you’re a woman.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're not supposed to enjoy if you're a Republican

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 22 points 1 year ago

No time for happy. Only angry and afraid. —Republican Manifesto

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago

You're supposed to stop and shame everyone else's enjoyment.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Nothing wrong with it but maybe she shouldn't have joined a club where the members have a pathological hatred of women.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

TWO trailer park girls go round the outside,

round the outside,

round the outside...

Waiting for one of them to challenge the other, "Cash me ousside, howbow dah?"

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A reference in a reference. Reference-ception

And then a third pop culture reference thrown in at the end. A triple whammy

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lucz1848@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

That seems a bit highbrow for these two, no?

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And then he spent the next 7 years sucking Trump off.

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IDK. If you read the tweet in a BDSM light it all becomes clear...

I don't think that's what he meant, but it's funnier

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

With Lindsey Graham, there's a solid 90% chance that's what he meant.

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Whenever I see MTG I think Magic the Gathering and get very confused

[–] 1847953620@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I think they've also trashed her.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jumbodumbo@lemmynsfw.com 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Magic the gathering is doing WHAT?!?

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 year ago

It's a new mechanic, trash a whore card puts it on the bottom of your discard pile, but if there are enough non-whore creatures above it in your discard, it gets resummoned, tapped.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] cryptosporidium140@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And here comes Boebert with the folding chair

[–] 1847953620@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

she SLAMMED her

[–] yemmly@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

I’m pretty sure she meant it in a collegial sense, as in “peer” or “fellow traveler”.

[–] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Lmao, she also called her a "bitch/ little bitch" for "copying" her articles of impeachment. Boebert defended herself by saying she never read it, which is also hilarious, because she voted on it.

"According to two sources that saw the exchange and a third familiar with the matter, the back and forth began when Boebert approached Greene—then seated in the chamber—and confronted her over “statements you made about me publicly.” All three of the sources said Greene called Boebert a “bitch.” One of the sources said Greene called her “a little bitch.”

According to two of the sources, Greene then stood up and alleged that Boebert “copied my articles of impeachment,” to which the Colorado lawmaker fired back that she hadn’t even read Greene’s resolution."

https://www.thedailybeast.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-calls-boebert-a-little-bitch-on-the-house-floor

I would PAY to have good c-span footage of that.

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 20 points 1 year ago

Boebert defended herself by saying never read it, which is also hilarious, because she voted on it.

This is actually believable.

[–] Additional_Prune@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Hateful people sometimes get tired of hating scapegoats and take some time to hate each other. It's like high school mean girls picking one of their own off from the herd.

[–] ettyblatant@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Fight! Fight! Fight! Fight!

[–] rothaine@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why are we giving these two attention

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can’t they just fuck and put it up for sale all ready

[–] milkjug@lemmy.wildfyre.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t watch it even if you pay me, but I will fight to my death to protect your right to watch.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I will fight to my death to protect your right to watch.

I don't believe you. I'm calling you on it.

[–] milkjug@lemmy.wildfyre.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Alright alright you caught me. Best I can do is a raised eyebrow and a disapproving yawn.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Large Marge is projecting

[–] creamed_eels@toast.ooo 10 points 1 year ago

Lmao they’re both doing the pick me dance

[–] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Sporkfoot throwing shade on Hoebert? That's like shit insulting puke.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I think Marge is just jealous about Qbert. A lot of Karen energy here. I bet anything Marge would have loved to be taken to the same show and do some dry cranking of her own.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In the words of Londo Mollari: Ladies, ladies please...continue.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] bmsok@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, they're gonna be so pissed if it's black

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cindylouwhovian@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Takes one to know one, I guess

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Now with the chair, Marge! And drag her into the mud pit like in the good old days of your hometown rodeos

load more comments
view more: next ›