rosymind

joined 1 year ago
[–] rosymind@leminal.space 2 points 8 months ago

Link doesn't work for me, but I'll look it up

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

https://usafacts.org/topics/education/

I was surprised to find out how much the U.S. actually does spend on education, given how shitty it is. Idk where the money is going, but it's definitely funded

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 5 points 8 months ago

Also assuming the van doesn't suddenly, greatly, accelerate

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 5 points 8 months ago

An old friend, back when I was 17/18 or so, told me about the last time she had a kitten.

The kitten somehow got into the WASHER and her busy and absent-minded mother didn't realize it until the kitten had already drowned. Her mother drove herself (and the kitten) to the police department because she felt so bad.

After that I have always checked for cats. Even now, at almost 40 (I even check the oven)! My husband thinks it's over-kill, but I'm never gonna get that horror story out of my head

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 7 points 8 months ago

She's just "liberating" the items from the woke Target agenda

( /s in case you didn't catch it)

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 4 points 8 months ago

I don't have any updated data, but reading this from the article you posted:

"Indeed, vaccinated people now make up the majority of the population – 79% of adults have completed at least the primary series – and the latest CDC data show that vaccinated people also now represent the majority of COVID-19 deaths. There are many more vaccinated people than there are unvaccinated people, and vaccinated and boosted people are, on average, older and more likely to have underlying health conditions that put them at risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes"

Seems to make sense. My guess is that most of the unvaxxed people that were gonna die from Covid have already died. Some people have become immuno-compromised after 2020, and so they are still dying, but most of them might already have an immunity built up through having caught it and survived. So it's likely those older, already vaxxed (but immuno-compromised) folks that are now being taken out by the newer mutations of the virus

(Again, i'm guessing, but it seems to make sense)

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 1 points 8 months ago

Update: 163 works! Thanks :)

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 1 points 8 months ago

It seems to be for all of them, but I'm wondering now since I spend most of my time on the all feed. The way I've been responding to comments is by finding the post and then scrolling down to find my comment. I'll try 163 and let you know

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I'm on 160 and it's still not working for me.

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 1 points 8 months ago

Sure, but before things can become commonplace we need voices advocating for the direction of that change. That's my goal. To be a voice.

Also, irrelevant to you, but: I might need a new Lemmy account. Connect isn't working for me and I can't find which e-mail I used to sign up for Lemmy. Super annoying, because I keep needing to search for the posts that I commented on, and then find the comments themselves in order to reply. My inbox just gives me errors about not finding the posts... but they're obviously still here

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah, that's gotta suck and I'm 100% not against people talking about who they are if they WANT to. What irritates me is the labels people are forced carry.

Like "wow a woman was finally able to achieve what men can achieve" or "wow this gay man was finally able to acheive what straight men can achieve" and that's the part that annoys me

Eta: I think it's meant well, but it implies that there's something "special" about these people that allows them to climb the ranks previously reserved for a select group of people

So to truly be inclusive, things like "race" and gender and sexuality should be looked at as variations of normal, the same way hair color or height is looked at

2nd edit: Ok, sorry, but just to clarify I'm not harping on straight, white, males here. Swinging the pendulum the exact opposite way doesn't help, either. I'm seeing this more as a societal thing that I'd liked to see changed

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

My guess is that it's to avoid something like finding records of a past leader who is gay, and them then being the first

My issue with this is: why does their sexuality even matter? It's their GD business

Eta: I also hate this with race and gender. "First woman to..." why? Why are we so focused on the color of people's skin, their religion, what's between their legs, or who they love?

I want to live in a world where a mixed-heritage lesbian woman is elected and no-one bats an eye, or mentions anything about it unless it comes up organically by the person elected. Otherwise the only legit question should be: is this person the best candidate for the job?

Ok Ill get off my soap box now

 

view more: next ›