this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
191 points (93.2% liked)

News

23276 readers
3459 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 129 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Anyone who thinks this is remotely possible or a good idea has no idea what healthcare providers actually do on a day to day basis- especially in inpatient settings like hospitals

[–] HaveYouPaidYourDues@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So the question is do the hospital administrators have any idea what healthcare providers actually do on a day to day basis

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

When it's gonna cost them $81/hour less per nurse, i don't think it's even gonna matter. They'll let someone else will deal with the fallout

[–] somethingchameleon@lemmy.ca 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. Everything is a calculated business decision.

They'll look at the laws, the penalties, and do whatever they believe will maximize profit.

Boeing did the same thing when they cut corners and killed over 300 people.

[–] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 10 points 7 months ago

Narrator : A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one.

Woman on Plane : Are there a lot of these kinds of accidents?

Narrator : You wouldn't believe.

Woman on Plane : Which car company do you work for?

Narrator : A major one.

Fight Club

[–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

My spouse is an ER doctor here in the US. The answer is no. They don't buy hospitals to take care of patients. They buy them to make a huge profit that the absolute state of the US healthcare system lets them get away with (private medicine and insurance, not the nurses and doctors working within it, to be clear).

The fuckery those assholes invent that adversely effect patient care for the sake of increasing profit margins is wild and infuriating to watch.

[–] 93maddie94@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago

I agree that nurses are invaluable and irreplaceable and that no AI is going to be able to replicate what a human’s judgement can do. But honestly it’ll be the same as what our hospital’s “nursing line” offers us right now. You call and they ask scripted questions and give you scripted responses which usually ends up with them recommending that you go in. I get that it’s for liability but after 2 calls for our newborn we stopped calling and just started making our own judgement. But for actual inpatient settings? Absolutely no way. There’s no replacement for actual healthcare providers.

[–] LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

They should use AI to help the folks in medical billing.

An AI chatbot that will continually call the insurance company until your procedure gets reimbursed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 85 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Nvidia has never seen a nurse and has no idea what they do

[–] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 11 points 7 months ago

And the private equities that own hospitals will purchase this anyway.

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Can't wait for the wave of lawsuits after the ai hallucinantes lethal advice then insists it's right.

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Reminds me of an AI that was programmed to play Tetris and survive for as long as possible. So the machine simply paused the game. Except in this case, it might decide the easiest way to end your suffering is to kill you, so slightly different stakes.

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

They did a trial test in Sweden but the LLM did tell a patient to take a ibuprofen and chill pill. The patient had a hard time breathing, pressure over the chest, and some other symptoms I can't remember.

A nurse overseeing the convo stepped in and told the patient to immediately call the equivalent of 911

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 64 points 7 months ago (2 children)

As soon as I work out that my nurse is not a real person, im ending the communication. I am not paying a GPU for healthcare.

[–] somethingchameleon@lemmy.ca 38 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Too bad it's going to be up to your insurance, lol.

Fuck this shitty country and the greedy useful idiots that inhabit it.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 7 months ago

I will send forth my own AI avatar to battle the nurse

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if insurance is going to be okay with an AI (famous for never making a mistake /s) being involved in healthcare? If a human nurse makes a mistake the insurance can sue them and their malpractice insurance, if the AI makes a mistake, who can they blame and go after?

If insurance companies refuse to pay for AI nurses, hospitals cant use them?

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 4 points 7 months ago

Ultimately the hospital is responsible for any mistakes their AI makes, so I suppose the insurance company would sue the hospital.

[–] myster0n@feddit.nl 14 points 7 months ago

No, you should start saying nonsense and see what that gets you. "My chicken just coagulated"

[–] exanime@lemmy.today 45 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Garbage... We have had services with real nurses doing telemedicine and it tends to suck

Essentially, the lack of actual information from a video chat (as opposed to an in person meeting), coupled with the "better cover the company's ass and not get sued", devolves into every call ending in "better go to the ER to be safe"

[–] riskable@programming.dev 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Telemedicine is fantastic and an amazing advancement in medical treatment. It's just that people keep trying to use it for things it's not good at and probably never will be good at.

For reference, here's what telemedicine is good at:

  • Refilling prescriptions. "Has anything changed?" "Nope": You get a refill.
  • Getting new prescriptions for conditions that don't really need a new diagnosis (e.g. someone that occasionally has flare-ups of psoriasis or occasional symptoms of other things).
  • Diagnosing blatantly obvious medical problems. "Doctor, it hurts when I do this!" "Yeah, don't do that."
  • Answering simple questions like, "can I take ibuprofen if I just took a cold medicine that contains acetaminophen?"
  • Therapy (duh). Do you really need to sit directly across from the therapist for them to talk to you? For some problems, sure. Most? Probably not.

It's never going to replace a nurse or doctor completely (someone has to listen to you breathe deeply and bonk your knee). However, with advancements in medical testing it may be possible that telemedicine could diagnose and treat more conditions in the future.

Using an Nvidia Nurse™ to do something like answering questions about medications seems fine. Such things have direct, factual answers and often simple instructions. An AI nurse could even be able to check the patient's entire medical history (which could be lengthy) in milliseconds in order to determine if a particular medication or course or action might not be best for a particular patient.

There's lots of room for improvement and efficiency gains in medicine. AI could be the prescription we need.

[–] exanime@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yes, I was a bit too extreme with my answer above, however, you'll be hard pressed to find people who don't already know, to formulate such a good question as:

can I take ibuprofen if I just took a cold medicine that contains acetaminophen?"

Refilling meds, absolutely... As long as the AI has access and can accurately interpret your medical history

This subject is super nuanced but the gist of the matter is that, at the moment, AI has been super hyped and it's only in the best interest of the people pumping this hype to keep the bubble growing. As such, Nvidia selling us the opportunities in AI, is like wolves telling us how Delicious, and morally sound it is to eat sheep 3 times daily

Oh and I don't know what kind of "therapy" you were referring to... But any psy therapy simple cannot be done by AI... You might as well tell people to get a dog or "when you feel down, smile"

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.world 40 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I want to replace Nvidia executives with AI for $9/hr. Wait, that’s overkill for those morons.

[–] MyNamesNotRobert@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Are you fucking kidding me. Some jobs are so shitty they won't even pay their human employees $9 an hour. Bots get paid more than some humans. That's how worthless they think people are.

[–] achance4cheese@sh.itjust.works 15 points 7 months ago

My friend, let me introduce you to parking spaces.

[–] CTDummy@lemm.ee 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Given these things still hallucinate quite frequently I don’t understand how this isn’t a massive risk for Nvidia. I also don’t find it impossible to imagine doctors and patients refusing to go to hospitals or clinics with these implemented.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

Oh, they don't want to automate the risk ofc. Just the profitable bits of nursing and then have one nurse left that does all the risk based stuff

[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Time to learn how to root your AI nurse to get infinite morphine.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If they can take away drudge work that hospitals force nurses to do and let human nurses do more in-person work (AI can not deliver a baby, for example), good, right?

Assuming they only put the AI on tasks where the AI is as good as a human or better because they will get sued if it makes a mistake, then this is just the same health care for cheaper to me. That's good. We need cheaper healthcare.

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Hippocratic promotes how it can undercut real human nurses, who can cost $90 an hour, with its cheap AI agents that offer medical advice to patients over video calls in real-time.

Kind of.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 5 points 7 months ago

Absolutely stupid. Some business major is going to promote this and get their hospital shut down for malpractice.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Nurses get paid $90 an hour?

[–] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

You know some hospital system will be out there hiring brainless diaper changers to replace RNs, and have a limited number of real nurses who will be very over worked.

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

nice, automated medical racism

[–] NorthCountryHermit@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Based on recent experiences in the medical system, AI replacements will probably be an improvement.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

My healthcare all rolled over like it does every single year... Except for my prescription plan. I had to register an account on their terrible website for both my wife and I before they would allow us to use our plan.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

I wish we had a way of leveraging these technologies minus capitalism. AI could solve a lot of problems and offer interesting information to real people, but the greedy bitches at the top are just going to use it as a way to finish off the middle class.

I long for the world of Star Trek where our needs are met and we can focus on our lives and interests, but I am too cynical to think that will ever be allowed by the people who run things and their addiction to profit.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Hippocratic AI. That's hilarious

[–] Icalasari@fedia.io 9 points 7 months ago

I for one think the lawyers and their billable hours will be VERY happy with this development!

[–] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

I foresee no problems with this plan. Surely this won't result in a string of completely avoidable deaths.

[–] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

If nothing else it would be fucking hilarious observing the interaction between a state of the art LLM with ML baked into it and an 80 y/o grandpa who just shit his pants and needs help

[–] emptyother@programming.dev 6 points 7 months ago

Of course we should! We replaced our doctors with hourly rentable books back when that tech became popular. /s

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I have been in and out of medical settings a lot in my life, especially lately, and nurses are amazing. They do so much more than doctors to make you feel at ease and spend more time with you than the 5 minutes the doctor usually does.

So thanks so fucking much, Nvidia.

[–] TheWeirdestCunt@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

wait isn't this old news? I could've sworn that this stuff was being talked about back in the early 2010s because it can help point stuff out to doctors. Or are they trying to 100% nurses instead of just using these systems as an aid?

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Different news, they're trying to replace nurses for 1/10 of the price. It's a short article, give it a gander!

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Yes, let me pay for the privilege of using an automated lying machine that has a high probability of getting me killed due to faulty medical advice. I don’t see what could possibly go wrong with this.

[–] thirstyhyena@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'll be scared if these ai nurses are able to draw blood

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

AI cant even draw hands, I think we're a long ways off from that.

[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Huh, how is that I know about this first here and not in the "Not The Onion" community.

load more comments
view more: next ›