this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
423 points (98.2% liked)

News

23399 readers
4777 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
423
San Jose bakery loses thousands of dollars after Tesla reportedly cancels large order (www.nbcbayarea.com)
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
75 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Two days after taking a job for Tesla, owner of The Giving Pies got a simple text message canceling the order

A catering contract to celebrate Black Heritage Month turned into a tough lesson for a Black-owned bakery in the South Bay earlier this month.

What started as a $16,000 deal ended up costing the small business owner thousands of dollars instead.

On Valentine’s Day, the owner of The Giving Pies in San Jose's Willow Glen neighborhood received a pretty sweet call from a representative with Tesla: a catering job for thousands of mini-pies for a Black History Month event.

Owner Voahangy Rasetarinera, who started the business out of her home in 2017, says both sides agreed on a quote and exchanged an invoice for 4,000 pies for delivery this week. Because of the tight turnaround, Rasetarinera asked staff to work extra hours, she bought ingredients and packaging supplies and declined at least three other catering jobs.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 197 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This sucks but it is a hard lesson about dealing with large companies. If any company wants anything that doesn't comes off the shelf of the store, they have to pay upfront. Pay has to be by a certain amount of days in advance of delivery date or the date is not guaranteed and will be late. Work doesn't start until payment is done. If they want to pay after delivery, sign a contract, require an advance of at least half of the bill or materials cost (whichever is highest), non-refundable, include a cancellation fee. Put this shit up as terms of service on a website and direct everyone to that page whenever you are contacted by a new client. The larger the client company, the more important it is to be this strict. For you it might be a bankruptcy inducing amount, but to them it will be immaterial pocket change, so you have to hold your ground.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 132 points 9 months ago (7 children)

I was a small business owner in this same situation. I got a contract, I got partial payment up front, then they renigged upon my finishing the job and asking for the rest of the payment. They said they'd pay me 10% of what they owe, AND demanded additional services for free. I took my contract to a bunch of lawyers, all who said the same thing "They're too rich to sue. They will delay, stall, and after years, even if you won, they still probably won't pay." What they owed me, they bragged about paying every time they flew their private jet. They could easily have paid, but instead they decided to destroy me and my company.

This isn't something the small business owner can protect against. To the rich, none of us or our laws matter.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 65 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The partial payment wasn't large enough if it left you wrecked at the end. Generally the partial payment should pre-pay to cover all of your expenses and labor. The final payment is the profit margin. That way you are never on the hook for a potential loss and will always break even.

So for the bakery, they should have had a full prepay policy on all special orders. Even if "customers" walked away because of the policy.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

I don't know what you think profit margin is but it's not much. At the point of getting full expenses you might as well ask for full payment.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

Yeah then at least everyone gets paid, and the workers walk away with a shitload of free pies!!

[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago

Name and shame my dude

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is why small claims exists. $7500 and THEY have to prove they DON'T owe it. If they don't show up, you win summary judgement. That should cover most things and even if it doesn't, it will all least soothe the wound.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 11 points 9 months ago

Can you tell us who? Maybe someone will “run into” them.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 8 points 9 months ago

The rich no longer fear the guillotine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 128 points 9 months ago (4 children)

It is fascinating to watch the rise and fall of Tesla's reputation. They went from "the cool brand" everyone wanted to something that automatically gets you labelled as a sucker and a douche, almost overnight.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 52 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That's usually what happens when a douchebag worms his way into a company, takes it over and squanders it.

[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

See: Reddit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Sadly, Musk built the cool brand reputation before destroying it, so this doesn't really apply. Nobody ever really heard of Tesla - the car brand - before Musk.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Thats what happens when you get a bunch of weirdo cultists who willfully ignore just how much of an astonishingly massive cunt Musk is, was, and always has been, until he pushes even them to the point that they have to admit what they always, deep down, knew.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 65 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There is such a power disparity between large corporations and normal people or small businesses. A corporation can make a small decision that would devestate a person or small business and it doesn't affect them at all.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't think this is legal, since it's a custom order. This is not like a consumer ordering an off the shelf product, it's more like a verbal contract IMO, but IANAL.

[–] Che_Donkey@lemmy.ml 21 points 9 months ago (3 children)

depends on the cancelation clause, usually there would be a time frame before the event they could cancel. There should also be a deposit-especially for events this large...non refundable would have been ideal especially if you need to get materials & OT for staff.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 17 points 9 months ago (5 children)

They exchanged an invoice which is closer to a quote unfortunately, as invoices are not contracts with clauses.

What sucks is it would cost her more in lawyer fees to sue than she lost. Fuck Tesla.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I don't think you can bring a lawyer to small claims court, to prevent this exact scenario. Tesla might send a manager or nobody. They can't send their legal team.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 10 points 9 months ago

Who Can File or Defend a Claim?

Corporation or other legal entity — A corporation or other legal entity (that is not a natural person) can be represented by a regular employee, an officer, or a director; a partnership can be represented by a partner or regular employee of the partnership. The representative may not be an attorney or person whose only job is to represent the party in small claims court.

Source

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

IDK if 16k is small claims, but if it is, she should definitely take it there.

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

$5k is the cap in my state. Should be similar in scope there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

big companies don't care, they are rich enough that they don't have to abide by contracts with little people.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So if Tesla is stupid enough to order again, she can say Okeydokey I'll be right on it, and when the delivery is due, she can just say Sorree I'm not gonna deliver anything anyway, have a nice day?
That's not a viable business environment, and surely there must be regulation to prevent businesses fucking each other off like that.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I'm not blaming the business owner here but not collecting payment upfront was a monumentally poor business decision.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] derf82@lemmy.world 59 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I'm betting managers were planning this, but when Musk found out it was for black history and ordered it canceled.

And while it is easy to just get paid in advance, sure, but that is a double-edged sword. Many companies and wealthy individuals will just use another company.

[–] runeko@programming.dev 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Then let your competitors wind up losing thousands of dollars when they cancel on them.

[–] lemmytry@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

or making a life changing sale, it's a gamble.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

If someone else wants to gamble their livelihood, that's on them.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Companies usually don't. It only makes the news when they do.

Worth noting sometimes companies often restrict expenses with crazy requirements. Sometimes they have no choice because they are prohibited from paying for something like food in advance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ech@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago

This is my thought as well. Such a predictable pos.

[–] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Should have told him it was for Musk Appreciation Month.

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago (1 children)

https://www.ktvu.com/news/business-booms-at-san-jose-pie-shop-after-tesla-backed-out-of-large-order

The pie shop is doing better now than it ever was and Musk now has a new pile of shit he just stepped in, all in all a happy ending

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The article does not say that she recouped her losses, so I'm not sure if it really is the happy ending you're claiming.

Don't get me wrong, it's nice that the San Jose Sharks made a $500 order, but she's out $6000 and I think the article would have mentioned if she made that and more back.

Tesla seriously fucked this woman over. And not just that, but fucked her black-owned small business over by claiming the order was for Black History Month, which makes it far, far worse. The only one who can make it up to her is Tesla.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] casmael@lemm.ee 37 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Man this is some trump tower level bullshit tbh

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Rasetarinera says after her story went viral, Tesla offered to buy the pies and a tour of their factory. She says she still hasn’t received a payment, so she’s focusing on other customers like the San Jose Sharks, who spent $500 on pies after hearing her story.

Even more. Literally then teased her again.

[–] Praxinoscope@lemm.ee 37 points 9 months ago

I used to live down the street from The Giving Pies when they first opened. They make great pies and the staff were really nice. Sucks to see this news!

[–] kjake@infosec.pub 36 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Seems like it would be fairly simple to at least sue them in small claims court. California allows up to $6250 for businesses.

[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I’m really surprised that, given the size of the order and the tight time frame, that she didn’t ask for the money up front…

But yeah. If she has anything in writing she should go to small claims 100%

[–] heartsofwar@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

While having something in writing is always best, she doesn't need anything in writing; verbal contracts do exist and its pretty reasonable to assume she wouldn't have spent thousands out of pocket hiring extra temp staff, letting staff work over time, turning down other work, etc if she didn't feel there was a verbal contract. Second, she likely has the text message which would be proof enough of there being reasonable suspicion there was a verbal contract.

I don't think it would be a slam dunk small claims case, but she should definitely take it to small claims if they don't compensate something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bitflip@lemmy.ml 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Make pies out of the rich

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›