this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
105 points (88.9% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

5358 readers
135 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Examples:

Your post: "What if God did this weird thing....

Their reply: "God doesn't exist so this question is nonsense."

Your post: "In the year 2075 everyone gets assigned jobs based on..."

Their reply: "Dude, with climate change there will be no us or jobs to do in 2075."

It's the Internet. People are trying to have fun and talk about wacky shit and escape from serious matters. Can't you either refrain from commenting or just play along?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yes,_and...

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 52 points 4 months ago (3 children)

This is not just an online thing. I'll do you one better.

My job involves, unfortunately, sometimes dealing with people. As much as I'd like to stay in my IT dungeon and remain undisturbed all day, I sometimes do have to emerge into the sunlight and interact with business clients.

Different people's brains are wired in different ways, not necessarily the same as yours. Based on my totally unscientific observation, it feels like roughly 1 in 5 people cannot comprehend hypotheticals at all. You can't ask them "picture this, but instead like this" because their brains literally can't form that image. If it is not an object or situation that is either in front of them, can be shown to them (on a screen, on a document, or whatever), or is one they have had personal and very specific past experience with, it's lost on them. Even if the hypothetical you're describing is barely any different from something you're physically showing them right now, except some trivial detail, they can't wrap their heads around it. You can break it down, you can explain it step-by-step until you're blue in the face. It doesn't work. As soon as you get to the last element, the hypothetical one, they tune out instantly.

And in my further experience around half of people in this camp will become confused and they'll handle that by getting angry at you.

I'm not a brainologist so I don't know why this is, or if there's a clinical name or mechanism behind it, or if it's abnormal and my industry just attracts devastatingly uncreative and stupid people. So in absence of any other information I'm just blaming lead paint and Boomerism.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 22 points 4 months ago

You are describing the "Concrete Operational" stage of intellectual development. At this stage people can think logically but only about concrete objects. Hypotheticals come later at the Formal Operational stage.

In normal healthy development, people grow beyond concrete operational around age 12. Many people do not, however.

https://www.verywellmind.com/concrete-operational-stage-of-cognitive-development-2795458

https://www.simplypsychology.org/concrete-operational.html

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Are you using "picture this" literally or figuratively?

Because aphantasia is actually a lot more common than you would think -- I see estimates range something like 1-5% of people.

So if it actually matters they literally picture something in their mind, I recommend strongly having a prop or sketchpad ready. Some people literally need it.

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You've unironically done the thing this post is about.

Literally carry a scratch pad everywhere just in case you're talking to a no pictures brain. Have a strong prop so you can talk to your co-worker. Like you need a fucking puppet named haych-tee-tee-pee to talk about why you need to install cat cables. Okay, maybe this was a good shitpost.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You’ve unironically done the thing this post is about.

The top comment in this chain assumes that everyone should be able to "picture this." I would also say that it assumes that the person explaining the "this" to be pictured is doing so sufficiently. Parent commenter points out that the "hypothetical" as designed has a flaw in its assumptions, and I have explained another.

If the aim is to have an understanding of reality that is more accurate, so that our interactions can be more productive, being aware of these kinds of flaws in assumptions is valuable. If the aim is "being right on the internet," then denying those flaws is what happens.

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Magnificent. We need a sentiment for when something can be said with or without a shit eating grin. Irony doesn't do it anymore.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Man you must be fun at parties.

The guy said it was part of his job to explains things. You can chose to be bad at your job struggle, and be stressed about it. Or you can make a change to be more inclusive and make things easier for yourself while you're at it.

But go ahead and be an asshole. Seems to come natural to you.

[–] ghashul@feddit.dk 2 points 4 months ago

It honestly sounds like it's something else. I have aphantasia, but I have no issue with complex concepts. You're right though that if the important bit is actually seeing it, then I'm at a loss.

From op I think it's people having issues with understanding a concept.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Hmm... an inability to imagine situations, hypotheticals, or what things will be like in the future due to today's decisions, you say?

That would certainly explain an awful lot, including my frequent bouts of intense frustration with some people.

I don't suppose you happen to be working in the healthcare industry? I have noticed people in that industry have a much harder time imagining how technology could improve their workflows than other industries I've worked in. This isn't based on scientific observation, or anything, so I may be biased and wrong.

[–] speck@kbin.social 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'd ascribe a lot of it to overwork and chronic stress. Most of us experience lives that keep us low functioning

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

That makes a lot of sense. That coke addict doc that came up with the whole overwork ethic is to blame.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

For the record, I'm agreeing with you, and Lemmy does seem like this sometimes:

Me:

The situation is: Slingblade and Oprah at a restaurant.

(As Slingblade) Man, I do love them french-fried potatoes.

Lemmy:

(Downvotes you)

No you don't, Oprah

I really hope someone gets the reference lol. 30 Rock did a whole gag that basically did the opposite of every "Yes, and..." guideline.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 13 points 4 months ago

I just rewatched for the... 7th or 8th time. There are always 30 rock fans around :)

[–] say_what_again@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 8 points 4 months ago

Yes! I caught that the first time I saw it, but damn if it's not awesome that Dan Harmon loves it so much too. The writers for 30 Rock were at the top of their class.

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Agree unpopular, up voted.

However, if your bit sucks it's no excuse.

[–] BumbleBeeButt@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 months ago

Anxiety narcissists are increasing in frequency. Blocking them is the way.

[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

I love these posts where the exact type of person being described shows up and comments exactly as the post is complaining about.

Good humor.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes, and it depends very much on context. It's one thing to explore hypotheticals as an exercise; it's quite another to indulge in hypotheticals to prop up unrealistic ideas. It's also disingenuous to smuggle in assertions as unassailable by wrapping them in "hypotheticals."

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah, there's a fine line between "devil's advocacy" and "concern trolling."

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wanted to see what bad post op made to necessitate this post....

It had to have been bad, because they made a whole ass new account.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I love how Voyager app makes it really easy to spot new accounts by putting a baby emoji next to the account name.

[–] GCanuck@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Is that what that means. I’ve been wondering. Thanks new friend.

[–] Vinny_93@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Yes and there should be an internet etiquette license and you don't get to go online before you take an exam

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Is that an unpopular opinion? Those people are annoying and are essentially spam within a comment chain even if I otherwise agree with them.

[–] adaveinthelife@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

Just wait until you have a casual conversation with an p.eng in real life.

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Eh, people are all dealing with their own reality, not everyone wants to play. Upvoted.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago

No I don't!