this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
572 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

59092 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 172 points 9 months ago (15 children)

It’s a native feature of the device that allows its user to get enormous amounts of attention, in real life and subsequently online, by simply wearing it in public.

Sounds horrible. I guess I’m not someone who seeks attention at any cost like some people, it public is the last situation I’d use this thing in. I would feel like a complete dumbass wearing it at a coffee shop and waving my hands around.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 86 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's the same problem google glass had. It can be the most information rich and user friendly device in the world but if you look like a dingus wearing it, it will never catch on.

[–] trebuchet@lemmy.ml 59 points 9 months ago (8 children)

That's what I thought about the elephant tusk looking AirPods yet here we are.

The Reality Distortion Field sometimes makes things hard to predict when it comes to Apple products.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (15 children)

What if I already look like a dingus?

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Then if you wear it you'll be an even bigger dingus and make other dinguses look less dingusy. It would kinda be a public service of sorts I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Yeah, last thing I want is more attention while wearing those things and the chance that people will be able to hear the audio from the pr0n I'd be watching on it.

[–] muse@kbin.social 29 points 9 months ago (4 children)

The masturbating in public might be a dead give away too

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 130 points 9 months ago (8 children)

They bought themselves into a beta test/focus group. Apple still doesn’t know what this will be. It might be a Newton MessagePad. Or it might be the iPhone.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 94 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Do we really want to live in a world where people are walking around with these things on their face, gesturing around like they are insane?

It's bad enough to witness how awful public spaces have become since smartphones came out, but this is next level zombie.

[–] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 44 points 9 months ago (8 children)

It is inevitable to a degree. Obviously this is not the final form and I’m sure the goal is to make a more fashionable solution that fits into their phone/watch/airpods kind of edc strategy. But no doubt we’ll have a future where info is right there if we want it. This thing is the foray into developing that eventual product for Apple. To me it looks real dumb, but a sleeker version in the future that looks like glasses…well shit it might be nice to watch a show while washing dishes idk.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

But no doubt we’ll have a future where info is right there if we want it.

But we're already there. It's called a smartphone.

The value add of replacing a pocket watch or a cellphone with a device about the same size that also fits in your pocket but also gives you access to all the world's information in seconds is immense. And that's why the smartphone revolutionized the world.

The value add of having that information strapped to your face at all times is... just not worth the physical discomfort of having said device strapped to your face.

I say this as a VR user. A device strapped over your face really sucks and you can't wait to take it off. The only reason to tolerate it is that that's the only way to trick your senses into thinking you are somewhere else.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 20 points 9 months ago (9 children)

If people can behave, I don't care what they wear or what they watch

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] dojan@lemmy.world 84 points 9 months ago (17 children)

It’s an AR iPad. It’s not that deep.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago (8 children)

I would love to walk around with a video playing in a fixed hud while I go around doing chores. I'm constantly finding places to put my phone down every time I move to another station.

I'm not paying $3500 for that, though.

[–] lurker8008@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (5 children)

That was the idea of Google glasses but it was too early and tech wasn't ready. It was gonna give you just enough useful info and get out of the way.

Plus Google haters made "glass-holes" viral.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] taanegl@lemmy.world 75 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (21 children)

They are people who paid $4000 to be a voluntary QA team.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 69 points 8 months ago (11 children)

They bought Tim Cook a new private jet. I thought they'd have figured by now.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

"Just park it next to the others."

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 67 points 8 months ago (9 children)

People who paid relatively a lot to feel that they are on with progress and have good taste. These are not things you can directly buy.

Of course, you can buy knowledge and powerful tooling, but I don't see such hype over digital libraries and good e-ink readers, or over learning programming among Apple fans.

On good taste specifically - Apple has always marketed itself as brand connected to that and has always been the opposite of good taste. I gave up trying to understand that long ago.

[–] Ainiriand@lemmy.world 36 points 8 months ago (2 children)

And exactly to prove your point I want to mention phone cases with a cutout so you can see the apple logo.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago (9 children)

And the whole green / blue messages bullshit. Apple never misses an opportunity to remind it's users they're paying a premium and everyone else is a plebe.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kautau@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (11 children)

And besides the tech bros with the throw away money, many of the people who have bought this thing are “influencers” and now are having trouble figuring out how to make content with or about this thing, because it’s early adopter play tech and has very little actual use, so the influencers are the ones putting out videos like “what would I even do with this?”

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Aopen@discuss.tchncs.de 56 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Apple Vision Pro Owners Are Struggling to Figure Out What They Just Bought

Im struggling to figure out why Apple Vision Pro Owners threw out $3500 on a device without knowing what they can use it for

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 59 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Apple puts out a product, Apple users buy the product. Nothing to figure out.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 19 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I just wonder how much Apple would make selling empty boxes and marketing them as such.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

I'm sure that the iBox would turn out a fair profit.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago (3 children)

People walking around with them on is basically just their wait of saying "look at my butthole!"

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 19 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Wait, are they ONLY wearing these? Because otherwise how are you seeing their butthole?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're going to tell me they sold 3500$ goggles without the xray specs the first Quest units had accidentally?

If I'm going to drop a rent payment on some bulky Overwatch Tracer goggles then they sure as hell will do x-ray specs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Huh. And here I am, like some poor person, with no AR headset and $3500 extra in my bank account. I feel like such an idiot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] InvaderDJ@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The people who buy something like this (hopefully) have enough money where $3,500 doesn't matter or are developers who want to get in early on something that might be big in a few versions.

Everyone else should avoid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 37 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

A 4K USD electronic device that's what they bought....if they needed its features not sure but... that's what they bought.

[–] Benaaasaaas@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

A 4K USD ~~electronic~~ status device

FTFY

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but they have it, and in the end, isn't that what matters?? /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Seems like most people are saying “this is dope for media,” and outside of that, it’s a glorified dev kit.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] verysoft@kbin.social 30 points 9 months ago (3 children)
[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Arnt they all.

I got the original vive which just my beatsaber player but due yo having a wife a job and chit to get done it lives in its protective case and when I do get a min yo use it both controler batteries are dead due to time living in a box

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 16 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Jesus, reading this made me feel like I wrote this.

I haven't touched my headset in months

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 30 points 9 months ago (6 children)

They got a hololens, but like 8 years later, for the same price, and still just as useless.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 24 points 9 months ago

Isn't it for people who have ridiculously too much money to dump some of it? :-P

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

I'd hope you'd know what you were spending this much money on if it wasn't just for online attention.

[–] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 17 points 9 months ago
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

to live and die on the first generation of a device

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 16 points 8 months ago

Never seen anyone wearing them or promoting/showing it off

I’ve seen a few people making fun of it, and that’s the only reason I know it exists

load more comments
view more: next ›