Technology

59092 readers

6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

572

Apple Vision Pro Owners Are Struggling to Figure Out What They Just Bought (nymag.com)

submitted 9 months ago by psychothumbs@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

278 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 130 points 9 months ago (3 children)

They bought themselves into a beta test/focus group. Apple still doesn’t know what this will be. It might be a Newton MessagePad. Or it might be the iPhone.

[–] nikt@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Apple is great at polishing and packaging things that already exist. The iPhone was a better Blackberry, the iPod a better MP3 player, the iMac a better all-in-one PC… I have a hard time thinking of stuff they truly pioneered. The Newton maybe? That did not end well for them.

If I had to bet, the Vision Pro will turn out to be a burnt pancake, but long term I have no doubt that something like it — something that augments reality one way or another — will become a thing. And in the meantime Apple has pockets more than deep enough to survive a failed Vision Pro.

The backlash against them trying to innovate is kind of dumb though. They aimed high for a change, and taking risks like this should be lauded not laughed at.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

The problem is they didn't aim high enough. AR/VR lives or dies on software. And for what they launched, it barely has the OS, and apparently that thing, although very polished UX wise, on security it's a swiss cheese. And few people has the pockets to develop apps for it.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They are still failing, in 2024, to put touch capability into their computers. This isn't a company that does innovativion well, and it hasn't been for over 15 years. It's totally fine to scoff at this attempt.

[–] dontwakethetrees@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I really don’t see touchscreens on laptops to be something to judge a company’s innovation on. I work in communications and I can really only think of two coworkers that personally own touchscreen laptops.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I have zero interest in touch screen on my laptop. It is not standard on Windows and has yet to show any really benefits.

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

There was quite a different reaction to the iPhone when it launched, so I'm pretty confident it's not the latter.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It's 100% not anything like the original iPhone. Say what you will, it will never be that.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I just meant as successful. They’ve had several. The original iPod. The iPad. They’ve also had duds. The newton. The HomePod. The Pippin. Ping