this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
572 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

59653 readers
3433 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I would love to walk around with a video playing in a fixed hud while I go around doing chores. I'm constantly finding places to put my phone down every time I move to another station.

I'm not paying $3500 for that, though.

[–] lurker8008@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (4 children)

That was the idea of Google glasses but it was too early and tech wasn't ready. It was gonna give you just enough useful info and get out of the way.

Plus Google haters made "glass-holes" viral.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 9 points 9 months ago

I'm not sure whether it would work better today.

What seems odd about the glasses is that they're essentially bodycams, but just unobtrusive enough not to be identified as such from a distance.

Someone walking around with an AR headset makes it very clear they're wearing a tech device, someone holding up a phone in front of them signals "I might be filming", but someone wearing slightly unusual glasses won't catch any attention. And that seems very weird to a lot of people.

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I thought Google Glass was a really cool idea. I actually liked Google back then.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

To be fair, that product was crazy expensive. It was basically exclusively for wealthy people. If it was cheaper, and easy to develop for, it would have been a huge success.

Look at what Apple has done here by comparison... This bullshit is even more expensive.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

God, I still dream of a device that works like we saw in the OG Glass concept video as opposed to the glorified Google Plus browser we got

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

OG Glass concept video

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm working on an open source version of an AR OS that can run on any Android phone, so you (will be) in luck!

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago

Post it on Lemmy when you get something running, very interested!

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago

This is like 20€

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Get a pair of Viture glasses then, it's about $500

[–] FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 0 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/shorts/zhXLC7n62YQ?si=TSu1p-WixFcbSxb2

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

The windows don’t come with you, you’d have to look at the corner and pinch to carry it around, then when you let go it anchors wherever you left it