this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
428 points (84.9% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6419 readers
62 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I seriously cannot have any degree of nuanced conversation here.

Like I get it, we all know capitalism is bad, but it feels like every time I or anyone go towards discussing the steps that need to be taken to address current looming problems in the short term, someone has to jump in and shut it down with "capitalism bad >:[ " and tear down any idea presented because its not complete and total destruction of the current economic model.

The result just feels like an echo chamber where no actual solutions get presented other than someone posting whole ass dissertations on their 33-step (where 30/33 steps are about as vague as "we'll just handle it") plan to fully convert the world to an anarchist commune.

Edit: I still vastly prefer Lemmy and the fediverse and a whole, my complaint here is that many of you are TOO INTENSE. You blow up small scale discussion.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 109 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Welcome to the Internet? It's not just Lemmy lol

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 63 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Agree. Reddit was the same thing if not worse. Nuance is [apparently] dead and if you do not explain everything from the dawn of Man to cover your thought, people pick the comment apart like carrion as if you've never thought about anything deeply before. They might even gloss over things you did say and attempt to invalidate or discredit your post because only they hold the Truth of the Internet handed down from the Elders. It can be a bit frustrating.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Did you even consider vegans don’t eat decaying flesh? You cant just hold everyone to your standards. I’m not even going to bother reading the rest of what you wrote because you're so fundamentally wrong already that I'm confident i can stop there and not miss anything of substance.

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

This is gold. Thank you!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago (15 children)

IMO, it's anywhere that has a voting system in place. Every forum has a hivemind, but the hivemind is especially reinforced when fake Internet points are at stake. That, and moderators yanking comments they don't agree with.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

Its not about the points, its about the weighted value.

Higher point posts go up higher snd are seen by more people. Lowering posts makes them less prominent.

You can go for a system of whoever posts first gets their comment to be first, leading to people rushing low quality crap to be at the top. Or most recent comment first, giving you a shit experience like browsing a discord for information. Or random post order, where high quality content gets buried under a sea of shit.

Ranked voting is the best option we've found that works online so far.

Personally I downvote shit all the time if i feel its not more worthy than other content. Everyone should be judging posts according to their own metric so we can average out content across a communities views.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 89 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

It is quite often that responses seem to come from school age children who just discovered [insert edgy counter-culture ideology], and all of their responses and world views revolve around a rudimentary desire for that ideological utopia, with very little consideration given to sociology or economics. I suppose that is actually who's responding a lot of the time. All real world considerations are discarded, and any issues you identify are perceived as stupid/shill/Trumper/dummy/capitalist drivel with zero consideration given.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 20 points 10 months ago

I do notice and kinda agree that some users here are great at arguing about theory, but can't see beyond that for practical application.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 10 months ago

Agreed, often if you check the post history of folks like that you'll see that they're still in school.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 83 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I find Lemmy significantly worse than reddit was in this regard. The number of times I've had my different (not unpopular outside of lemmy) opinion met immediately with personal insults is way higher here in the few months I've been here than my years with reddit.

I've just been learning not to engage on any of the lemmy propaganda areas, and that leaves me with a lot less active communities.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I agree, and attribute that to the kind of people who would boycott Reddit forever, where the largest part of the lemmy population seems to originate from.

As much as I roll my eyes at the overuse of the term, lemmy is mostly comprised of the "woke"est of the reddit population.

[–] DreamerofDays@kbin.social 16 points 10 months ago

People who make their politics their personality appear at both ends of the spectrum.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 61 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but have you tried using Linux, going vegan and guillotining billionaires?

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 40 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You forgot Firefox, you absolute monster!

[–] june@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

And FOSS. Don’t forget FOSS

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 59 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Like I get it, we all know capitalism is bad, but it feels like every time I or anyone go towards discussing the steps that need to be taken to address current looming problems in the short term, someone has to jump in and shut it down with "capitalism bad >:[ " and tear down any idea presented because its not complete and total destruction of the current economic model.

That is literally why my instance finally defederated from .ml Every 3rd comment from someone there was exactly that regardless of what community you were in. It was exhausting. Lemmygrad and Hexbear were already blocked here, and once the .ml peanut gallery was gone, it was like "wow, this is kind of enjoyable again".

Do I miss a few FOSS communities that were more active there than their counterparts elsewhere? Yeah, a little. But, overall, the experience is just so much better after they were blocked. It's not even that I really disagree with them on everything, it's just....STFU already, stop brigading, and maybe say something constructive for once.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Hexbear were already blocked

Yeah things were so, so much worse before that happened. I finally blocked the whole instance in my client so I didn't tear out all my remaining hair.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 47 points 10 months ago (9 children)

I dunno man, I didn't come here looking to contribute to or find a plan to fix the world. I came here to doom scroll and look at memes.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 43 points 10 months ago (6 children)

I feel like many people here are literally unreasonable. Any person with any faith at all is an idiot, all enlightened atheists are superior... FuckCars seems to be leaking and anyone who has to drive for their job is hated on... Linux is the only option, you should never, ever use Windows for anything... etc...

Like, not everything is black and white! The real world is shades of grey and often requires compromise. But the loudest voices here seem to be extremists that slap down any comment that isn't 100% what they believe in. It's exhausting...

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (11 children)

I mean, to be fair, it is the internet.

a large portion of people on it are, in fact, idiots.

Thats the price we paid when the internet went from a nerd toy in the mid/late 90s, to essential utility in the aughts.

[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As a nerd who was on the internet in the 90s I can assure you that was no filter against idiots.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 29 points 10 months ago

This is my big problem with online spaces. Yes it's great to demand that everything should be different, but I've spun on this planet for a few decades and all I can say is change happens slowly.

We're still dealing with the fallout from slavery and it ended over a century ago. A decade ago I fought for gay marriage and I thought we won, but it's still being contested.

Keep fighting for change, but know that we need to focus on small victories. Places like the US are not going to give up capitalism in the next year. Or the next decade. Or century. What we can do however is push for strong regulation, housing, and rights.

Nuance here is important, and I agree dropping the "everything bad is bad" talk is key. We all know it's bad, but a country is a big ship, and a big ship takes a very long time to turn around.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (8 children)

I actually appreciate the flow of opinions and information from people with other viewpoints and political opinions. Yeah people can be too intense like you say. I've really enjoyed learning about politics from a communist's perspective. I was sort of blown away by people who disliked liberals but their talking points weren't those of the American right wing. They were leftist communists, and their viewpoints are really fascinating. I've really gone into the rabbit hole learning about class warfare and historical actions of communist countries. If people are trying to spread their viewpoints they should be able to make compelling arguments to support the things they advocate for. I'd be happy to digest more communist information/propaganda/marketing it's really well thought out stuff.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

In fact I agree with your "echo chamber" comments, by design the servers and communities foster a group of like-minded individuals and the moderation is enforcing the same kind of thinking and rules.

At the same time, I find it more possible to get nuanced takes, back and forth discussion that isn't just troll bait or shouting matches here on Lemmy than elsewhere. People approach some topics with more curiousity, are a bit more willing to admit they are wrong/corrected about something and listen to each other's perspectives. Productive communication is a two way street. There's still a group of jerks, trolls and bad actors, but it's a monumental effort to moderate them away and they're virtually inevitable in any populated anonymous online space.

I don't really mind if something is downvoted for being unpopular unless it's an obvious troll/flamer. That includes people that talk about capitalism's benefits. I know there are cases of missed references or sarcasm, I am a proponent of /s to avoid misunderstanding for that reason.

What sort of thing would you like to have a nuanced discussion on?

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Really just the half steps and the means to make progress towards a better system that works for the benefit of the majority, y'know, socialism. It's a bottom up discussion that always gets taken over by the top-down people who can only ever talk about the whole shebang.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 21 points 10 months ago

I notice there is definitely a lot of bad faith discussions happening, but there's also a lot of us who are autistic lol

[–] Fudoshin@feddit.uk 19 points 10 months ago (10 children)

It's not a Lemmy thing, it's an internet thing. People have become lazy and instead of discussing things will just vote and move on.

Makes for a very boring and stale world.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

They also have a reddit-scale visceral hatred for religion lmao

[–] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 23 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Religion is fucking bad, though: without hyperbole, it is and always has been a scourge on our collective existence.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (19 children)

But religious people aren't always bad and that seems to get lost on here.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] 01011@monero.town 19 points 10 months ago

Would people hate religion if religion wasn't constantly weaponized against individuals?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

Whenever I have a broad vague discussion of the world that is subject to significant interpretations and assumptions it creates a lot of friction too. Contraversy is one place where Lemmy's high response rates work against it.

To the people doing "capitalism bad" replies I implore you to check out socialist economists. Fleshed out descriptions of socialism and communism usually discuss emulating the successes of industrial capitalism while mitigating the failures. The idea of armed revolutionary communism is largely a mess that only ever worked in rural environments.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

That isn't a universally unpopular opinion; at least two of us hold it lol.

I may have to ignore all the politics and news communities for a while and focus on more important things like star trek memes.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 10 months ago

I have a feeling the comments section here is going to be a case study in irony.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (4 children)

If you block unhelpful people you improve the Internet for yourself.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Bobmighty@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Want deeper discussion? I'm reading "being no one" by Thomas Metzinger. In simplistic terms, it's a scientific book about how you aren't a self, but a constantly running process. I'm very down to discuss it.

Of course, people aren't using Lemmy for that level of discussion generally. They're using it to entertain themselves while shitting, or they're urgently trying to push agendas. That's the internet these days. People geeking on specific subjects into granular detail is on life support in tiny communities.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Yup. That's why I started up a new community:

!actual_discussion@lemmy.ca

To quote our pinned thread:

Why did I make this community? Well, mostly in response to the rest of Lemmy and the way many otherwise interesting discussion threads fall apart into downvoting and groupthink.

I don’t like people making baseless accusations and defend people on all sides when people are wrong about their opposition. I hate it when people think they know what others think and project incorrect (and often evil) bullshit on each other. It’s important to maintain solid reasoning and conclusions, not just one or the other.

I hate people being wilfully wrong because their group fetishizes a certain angle of the truth instead of the boring reality of the situation.

Ideas are important and I don’t feel we can get out of the current shitty slump we’re in with political discourse unless we are able to clearly articulate ourselves and discuss the world we’re in.

You (and all of you who feel the way you do) are welcome. You won't always agree with everyone there. That's okay. We talk about it. We're grown-ups.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 11 points 10 months ago

Nuh-uh doodoo head!

[–] ReallyKinda@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think this is a general problem with online discussion. You can have more productive discussion about capitalism/socialism/anarchism in a bar in the deep south than you can online. Online people tend to forget there’s another person with a brain on the other side of the conversation (if they even intended to be having a conversation, which people mostly don’t). We know from every day life that people don’t speak carefully in conversation—you really have to be constantly extending the benefit of the doubt. Online no one extends the benefit of the doubt even though we know most comments are off the cuff on the toilet.

There are some neat online tools for structuring discussions like Kialo that I think make some headway in diminishing the effect, but drinking a beer with someone while discussing still works better as far as having an interlocutor who is actually considering what you’re saying and who might actually be willing to shift their own view.

Internet is better equipped for quippy one liners and getting (bastardized) ideas into the zeitgeist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] br3d@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I discovered Lemmy and Hacker news at roughly the same time, and the difference in comment quality is striking. Obviously HN is a lot more mature platform, and more specialised, but still... People over there are lamenting the quality of their comments and saying they're not what they used to be, but the majority are interesting and constructive

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›