magnusrufus

joined 1 year ago
[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think your post would greatly benefit from an introductory paragraph preparing readers for what to expect. As it is the title and current first paragraph don't convey the gist of what your post is about or why anyone should care about or read it and given it's length most people are not going to give it the time to try and put that info together on their own.

[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

More accurately it's the republicans way of saying that.

[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I dunno. From ABCDE's comments and Demi's lyrics I was reading the conversation as being about the latter. I didn't really see anyone making the case that Wilmer wasn't being a creep.

[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I'm not moving the goal posts. Read vaultboy's post. Of the four sentences (if we ignore the apparent typo) three of them focus only on the age gap. The other establishes the premise of grooming and mentions the age gap again. Vaultboys point never addresses a 17 year old's capacity to consent. Vaultboy makes a case that the age gap is objectionable. That is a valid point, it's just not the one that they thought were making.

[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Keep jerkin to nonconsensual porn.

[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is this post part of a meta trend of making obvious statements as though they were unpopular opinions?

[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Your phone or car saying you were near the scene of a crime when it occurred. Your phone or car showing that you regularly cross paths with a person of interest. Jammer would keep those devices from rating you out.

[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

that’s why opposing Putin “defends” liberty

You lost me here. Could you explain?

[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

I occasionally listen to a podcast that reviews basically any and all movies that are adapted from comics and they take their name from the exact issue you mentioned, Not Another Origin Story. I guess it shows that even among the people that really enjoy and are passionate about superhero movies constantly redoing the origin is a tired act.

[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (5 children)

The point you are making is aside from consent though.

[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I used to like Neil but then I saw him give a talk in person at a local college. There was some girl that asked a silly question during the q and a part of the visit and in front of an audience of hundreds of people Neil laid into her about how her question was stupid and she was wasting everyone's time. He did that until she started crying and left. After the next person asked a question as Neil was wrapping up his answer he decided to get another jab at the girl he already chased off by saying "and that's a real question". It's hard to convey how clearly the cruelty and contempt hung in that room.

view more: next ›