magnusrufus

I think your post would greatly benefit from an introductory paragraph preparing readers for what to expect. As it is the title and current first paragraph don't convey the gist of what your post is about or why anyone should care about or read it and given it's length most people are not going to give it the time to try and put that info together on their own.

We could consider those politicians employees of TurboTax and H&R Block just with extra steps

More accurately it's the republicans way of saying that.

I dunno. From ABCDE's comments and Demi's lyrics I was reading the conversation as being about the latter. I didn't really see anyone making the case that Wilmer wasn't being a creep.

I'm not moving the goal posts. Read vaultboy's post. Of the four sentences (if we ignore the apparent typo) three of them focus only on the age gap. The other establishes the premise of grooming and mentions the age gap again. Vaultboys point never addresses a 17 year old's capacity to consent. Vaultboy makes a case that the age gap is objectionable. That is a valid point, it's just not the one that they thought were making.

Bad bot.

Keep jerkin to nonconsensual porn.

Is this post part of a meta trend of making obvious statements as though they were unpopular opinions?

Your phone or car saying you were near the scene of a crime when it occurred. Your phone or car showing that you regularly cross paths with a person of interest. Jammer would keep those devices from rating you out.

that’s why opposing Putin “defends” liberty

You lost me here. Could you explain?

I occasionally listen to a podcast that reviews basically any and all movies that are adapted from comics and they take their name from the exact issue you mentioned, Not Another Origin Story. I guess it shows that even among the people that really enjoy and are passionate about superhero movies constantly redoing the origin is a tired act.

The point you are making is aside from consent though.