Septimaeus

joined 1 year ago
[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The latter, for Roth IRA.^A^ If you haven’t set one up before, it’s pretty straightforward.^B^

^A^: There is such a thing as a Roth 401(k) which if offered should definitely be your top priority up to employer contribution match.

^B^: Vanguard is often recommended for simplicity and low fees. You can pick your funds when contributing. Typical starting funds are VTI and VOO (or the mutual fund equivalents with slightly lower fees, VTSAX and VFIAX).

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Roth grows tax-free and has more long term flexibility compared to traditional IRA. The tradeoff is that it doesn’t reduce your taxes in the year you contribute. It’s the better option for most.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Depends on adhesive and era but today mostly yes

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 9 points 1 week ago

We can satisfy this curiosity with a fair amount of scientific evidence.

Of course, most regions of the brain are so densely and variably interconnected that the technical difficulty of “replacing parts” precedes the ethical consideration by many, many years. But we do have a great deal of evidence for how our subjective sense of self is affected by “losing/removing parts” of the brain. Patients are often unaware of change unless evidence for it is overwhelming, and even then are adept at healing/reconciling instinctively. It appears that this is just something brains have evolved to do.

So while the technology (and sheer artistry) required to match and “stitch” these networks is quite staggering, basically magic, it is theoretically possible that a patient could have every part replaced without recognizing any continuity errors in the chimeric stages, until one day they wake up as a completely different person.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 5 points 1 week ago

Did Ned Flanders write this headline? Reword that shit.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah other commenter was incorrect. They’re sold with only a basic collection of first-party apps (even the carrier locked devices, so far).

To get one with third-party apps pre-installed requires special provisioning meant for employee work phones. (If you come across one of these in the wild, ask the seller to reset in front of you. If the bloatware remains, odds are the device was recently stolen.)

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 6 points 1 week ago

Any major city in the West.

More visibly specialized knives, like cleavers, will turn fewer heads, but only if carried in a demonstrably safe and non-threatening manner, such as cradling the hilt with an outward grip.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Habitually using your own machine for non-work tasks often lets you keep certain records of the research process which begat the work, even while the client/employer owns the work itself through SLA/NDA/AOI. This typically includes records contributing to general “personal expertise,” such as query history, bookmarks, generalized notes, and other non-proprietary information.

It also lends to an overall impression of professional sprezzatura when the client can only see a history of master strokes, without the nitty-gritty details of your autodidactic effort.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 5 points 3 weeks ago

Assign it as a research collection task to a junior dev and forget to follow up.

(Fr tho, auto doc frameworks and related instrumentation are easily worth weeks. I will fight your manager.)

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think he meant ‘first’ as in top-most, the one with the preemptive disclaimer.

view more: next ›