this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
127 points (97.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26337 readers
2901 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

For me "How long could I get away with driving like an ABSOLUTE ASSHOLE all the time before I lost my licence or had an accident." Speed limits, red lights, stop signs... forget them all. Every day I have to drive sensibly and obey the law because without my licence I dont have a job, and every day I see at least one person driving like an absolute moron and I wonder...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Eugenics. Not the racist BS that was done in the past, but really pushing the limit to see if we can breed super humans. Genetic editing to make humans immune to cancer or disease. Increased lifespan. Resistance to radiation. Smarter. Stronger. Better.

Arguably, this kind of thing is actually somewhat of a necessity if we ever want to explore the stars. We are far too fragile in our current bodies to survive the difficulties and vastness of space.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mad_Punda@feddit.org 7 points 5 days ago

Testing a ton of medication for pregnant/breastfeeding women. So much medication I couldn’t take, simply because it’s not considered ethical to have the studies done, since it could affect the baby in all sorts of ways. Which we can’t clear up without the studies. So annoying.

[–] BigDotNet@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Developing a wireless brain-electronic interface. I believe it will be not so bad if the development is non intrusive.

[–] Skates@feddit.nl -3 points 5 days ago

Probably seeing what amount of pain each asshole driver can suffer before they die. Hope you're at least a 9, OP!

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 50 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Isolate a bunch of babies together, with food etc, and see how they develop their own language and society.

[–] zipkag@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Not exactly the same, but suggests probably it would not turn out well. https://thebrain.mcgill.ca/flash/capsules/histoire_bleu06.html

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] maxenmajs@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It may not be possible, but I want to gradually replace a person's brain piece-by-piece with the same areas from other brains and see if they retain their sense of self when none of the original brain remains.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 9 points 6 days ago

We can satisfy this curiosity with a fair amount of scientific evidence.

Of course, most regions of the brain are so densely and variably interconnected that the technical difficulty of “replacing parts” precedes the ethical consideration by many, many years. But we do have a great deal of evidence for how our subjective sense of self is affected by “losing/removing parts” of the brain. Patients are often unaware of change unless evidence for it is overwhelming, and even then are adept at healing/reconciling instinctively. It appears that this is just something brains have evolved to do.

So while the technology (and sheer artistry) required to match and “stitch” these networks is quite staggering, basically magic, it is theoretically possible that a patient could have every part replaced without recognizing any continuity errors in the chimeric stages, until one day they wake up as a completely different person.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

The brain of Theseus!

[–] JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch 9 points 1 week ago

And keep the old pieces, in the end assemble them back together and see what the differences are

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] konalt@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Raise a kid in a sensory deprivation chamber, with one exception: a monitor that only shows gen alpha brainrot videos. When they're like 14 drop them off in a populated area and see what happens

[–] kava@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Realistically would just end up a developmentally stunted invalid. There was an example from some book, I don't remember which, where there was a SE Asian woman who lived with her family and had a baby.

The family was ashamed, so they forced the girl to keep the baby by itself in the attic. She would go to work most of the day, and come back to take care of it when home. That was the total extent of interaction and stimulation the baby got. It ended up being severely stunted and never learned to talk.

Essentially young children need human interaction which includes warmth and constant validation, caring for, etc

If you interrupt that in any way, you end up with a feral child who is permanently stunted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I want to totally impoverish the 50 richest capitalists to see if they could "bootstrap" themselves out of it for real.

Okay, so there's nothing unethical or dangerous about that (they are capitalist parasites, not humans), but it would still be interesting to see.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Eddie Murphy and Dan Ackroyd already published the definitive paper on this.

[–] stelelor@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

Cyborg-like implants. I want titanium joints and UV vision and magnetic field sensors and charging my phone by laying it on my belly. Uncap each finger to reveal a small tool: screwdriver, USB key, cutting blade, etc.

Note that none of that includes or requires a constant connection to a network/internet. I want to augment my interactions with the real world, not replace them with a virtual world.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Biohackers have been toying with very primitive versions of this for over a decade.

Things like implanting RFID capsules in their hands or fingers to act as credit cards or key fobs... lots of fun infections.

I am fairly sure the movement has basically died out since bluetooth became widespread.

On the other hand, you can always sign up as a test subject for neuralink rofl.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh boy do I have an 80's cartoon for you…

[–] serpineslair@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Go-go-gadget...

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I've looked forward to this most of my life, but given how things have changed, I would never do it. There's no way these implants wouldn't be subscription based, and spy on everything you do. Oh, you forgot to pay your enhanced eyeball subscription? Now you're blind, motherfucker!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Menschlicher_Fehler@feddit.org 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

How far can you strip down the human body until it can't survive anymore. Assisted feeding and breathing is okay. Adjustable room temperature too.

Arms, Legs? Gone. Can we get rid of the skin? Probably, if the room is the right temperature? Bones? Most of them aren't needed, are they? Some organs surely can go too.

Basically, what is the bare minimum needed so the body and the mind still more or less work.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

So, firstly, may I suggest you check youtube for one of the now many 'Adventures of Torso' type videos done in Kenshi.

But as far as keeping a 'minimum viable' human actually alive?

You could remove limbs, but you would still have to have a method for them to eat and urinate and deficate.

You... almost certainly could not remove all skin and keep someone alive for very long.

For starters, they'd bleed to death. Secondly, the pain of existing without skin would probably literally kill them or drive them to try to kill themselves. Thirdly: Skin prevents infections, you'd have to keep them in basically a totally hermetically sealed room or container.

Bones? A de-boned human?

Well there's almost certainly not a way to remove all of your spinal bones and skull without causing death or immensely serious paralysis and/or brain damage.

Sure you could remain alive without all your limbs if you have caretakers, you can survive without your lower jaw as well... You can maybe? survive with the loss of a certain high percentage of your ribcage, but probably not with the entirety of it and your sternum removed.

Organs? Well, brain, heart and liver are almost certainly mandatory.

Though you can remove portions of your liver and it can still function and regrow to some extent...

...and portions of your brain... though you'll lose cognitive abilities, memories and basically become braindead but still technically alive at some point.

Assuming we are just removing things and maybe hooking you up to various kinds if life support tubes and not replacing organs with some kind of mechanical or genetically engineered equivalent:

I think you can survive without any kidneys if you are constantly on dialysis, but its far better to have at least one.

Similarly: Lungs, you need at least one.

You can have your stomach and intestines and bladder partially removed or reshaped, but not entirely.

You can survive without eyes... and a gallbladder and a thymus and a spleen and an appendix and your tonsils... and your adenoids, and your sex organs, but you're gonna need a great deal of monitoring and bloodwork and hormone balancing and what not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Asphalt@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago

For this you don't need a human, Can start with monkeys.

Disclaimer: I don't want this experiment to happen.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Denjin@lemmings.world 20 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I want to see how far you can push performance of the human body, and make the results compete against each other. All the bonkers whacky surgeries you can think of: limb lengthening, bone strengthening, replace their organs with bigger, stronger versions.

All the drugs: hgh, steroids, any performance enhancing substance you can pump into an athlete.

Have sports scientists raise children so that they're born into a dedicated training regime for running or swimming.

Then make them compete against each other in the trans-human olympics. I want to see someone do the 100m in 3 seconds, I want to see someone not have to come up for air during the freestyle, I want someone to throw a javelin 2 miles, I want bioengineered mutants doing gymnastics routines

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 18 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Gorillas on steroids. How bulky can these magnificent already bulky beasts get?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I’d give everyone a device that allows them to take photos of themselves and their lives, and then instantly post them online. Other people would be able to rate and comment on how well or badly they think someone is doing, based on these curated snapshots of their existence. In this experiment, people could also scroll through endless streams of these 'highlights,' constantly comparing their lives to others. To spice it up, I’d introduce a feature that allows people to see how many likes or comments other posts are getting, so they can feel great or miserable about themselves in real-time.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 week ago

Oh boy, have I got good news for you!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (3 children)

A bit contemporary, but I'd like to have studied what it takes to break someone of illusions that were fed and forced on them externally, e.g. schooling, TV, social media and other forms of cultural imprinting and propaganda.

We've all had that "what would it take to get this person to realize how far off base they are?" question, it would be fascinating, in a no-holds barred experiment testing various solutions and combinations to find out which is the most effective.

E.g. someone believes climate change isn't real because (x,y,z irrelevant). No amount of written evidence is effective to people who don't understand the scientific method, so would it be videos, traveling to acutely affected places, having polar bears removed from all zoos, baseball bats on their knuckles when they make a logical fallacy?

It would be interesting to then categorize the types of delusions or illusions and then prescribe treatment based on these results.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Tons of drug tests on children to know the exact effect they have on development. Also anti-aging research to see how much you can potentially slow down aging and how the self repair mechanism of children works with respect to aging. The results could really give us a great insight into aging well and being healthy later in life.

To clarify, I don't want to see them done, performed, do them myself or anything adjacent because they're deeply wrong and dangerous.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'd like an extensive dietary breakdown of the potential benefits or harms of eating the flesh and organs of humans with net worths of over 10 million, 100 million, 1 billion, 10 billion, 100 billion dollars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I've broken traffic laws most of my life, and I still have a driver's license. So, you can drive like a partially reasonable asshole indefinitely if you have the skill to pull it off.

I'd like to see GMO humans. I want to see how far we can elevate our species using science. It's completely unethical, but there it is.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It would also require centuries, so it's not as possible, but breeding people for very specific traits and features. Whether appearance, physical strength, overall intelligence, specifically being great in mathematics, great smell, great sight.

Basically, control the evolution by favoring very specific features and outright disallowing others (like hereditary diseases/disorders) that would be unacceptable in the mix.

Since this requires a lot of time which I'd somehow theoretically have (I know, this wasn't in the post, but anyway...), I'd want to try yet another thing. Breeding at the most late age possible, then continuing with that and extending it. Perhaps it would lead to increased lifespan, or at least lesser effects of aging in the far far offsprings. At least physically. These experiments don't exactly favor mental health of the subjects.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lath@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What happens when we reverse Earth's rotation.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Lois Lane gets rescued.

[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I'm fairly certain that there's a What If video on this by the XKCD guy, Randall Munroe.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Genetic engineering. We have the technology at this, point. What's getting in the way are some very dated ideas of ethics.

[–] BodePlotHole@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'd like to experiment with other non-capitalist based systems in various points of infra-structure of my country.

I don't think this "only make money in all things, all the time" shit is a smart way to manage numerous complex systems.

I don't have all the answers on how that shakes out, but I think the first move would be to only allow professionals experienced in respective fields to set up these experiments. Existing profitable systems and overseeing corporations be damned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Raise a child on their own without any exposure to language. Could be interesting to see how their perspective on the world develops.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 11 points 1 week ago

make a fallout shelter and have some isolated communities there live off purely of either one of meta, apple, or alphabet products (or any large enough multinational like nestle).

all for the science of understanding addiction and brand cultism.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Human genetic engineering. I'm sure governments are already doing this, because the technology is already here.

You could create super soldiers or very intelligent people. You could then copy them in cloning vats and have an army of people you could shape and mold to your will.

Could experiment with all sorts of stuff. For example they've put biiluminescent genes from certain fish into frogs to make glowing frogs. Now imagine giving humans the raw power of chimps. Or the ability to see UV light like birds. Or venomous spit. Or the power to smell like dogs.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

the power to smell like dogs

I know how it was meant, but imagine a new X-men hero who has only the ability to smell like a wet dog. That's some Deadpool level of absurdity.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›