how else would he be able to prove to the Russians that he's still a strong leader, deserving of power?
this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
108 points (94.3% liked)
World News
38569 readers
2428 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Reminder that the US never even signed it, so hypocritical to be angry at Russia for leaving.
Yes but the United States has never tested nuclear weapons after the band came in place. Russia's actions meanwhile have the feel of a country that intends to perform a test.
Implications matter.
In the same vein the United States does not recognise the international court of human rights. But Russia's refusal to recognise the court is entirely so they can carry out atrocities. The United States refusal to acknowledge it is because they're stubborn.
No it's because the US refuses to answer to their own war crimes.
with how their military has performed, he needs to know yesterday if the mutually-assured-destruction scenario is still gonna be mutual, or just him.
Why are people getting angry over this? The US hasn't ratified it either. China hasn't either. Nor Israel. India hasn't even signed it.
Just read it from the wikipedia article: states that need to take further action for the treaty to enter into force: China, Egypt, India, Iran, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan, United States
Anyway, it's rich how people get angry now that Russia is doing exactly what the US is.
They've got to make sure at least one of their nukes hasn't had its components sold to buy vodka, otherwise how can they keep threatening to nuke people?
Russia has been threatening to use nukes for years. This is just fear mongering because not even Putin is dumb enough to launch a nuke.
Moscow can fuck off. China and India ain't going to tolerate that shit and it'll open the door western and eastern operations. Nobody in the fucking East wants to deal with nuclear fallout.
Yeah China and India are tentatively siding with Russia right now, but this would put a stop to that in a hot second
Especially since there's literally nothing to be gained beyond dick waving - it's not like they don't already know that their nukes work, sadly nuclear warheads are a solved technology
I think that's wishful thinking here. China hasn't ratified the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, and India hasn't even signed it. [1] I highly suspect they care.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehensive_Nuclear-Test-Ban_Treaty
I think they'll care if they have to deal with fallout from Siberia
"Don't make me nuke myself!"
Worst case scenario, Putin finally brings lasting peace to both Russia and Israel. Best case scenario, he irradiates a huge swath of Siberia to attempt to deter China from seizing territory in the northeast.
MacArthur if Truman fell out a window
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Nov 2 (Reuters) - President Vladimir Putin on Thursday signed a law withdrawing Russia's ratification of the global treaty banning nuclear weapons tests, a step condemned by the organisation which promotes adherence to the landmark arms control pact.
The move, though expected, is evidence of the deep chill between the United States and Russia, whose ties are at their lowest level since the 1962 Cuban missile crisis over the war in Ukraine and what Moscow casts as Washington's attempts to stymie the emergence of a new multipolar world order.
But some Western arms control experts are concerned that Russia may be inching towards a nuclear test to intimidate and evoke fear amid the Ukraine war.
Robert Floyd, head of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban-Treaty Organization, whose job is to promote recognition of the treaty and build up its verification regime to ensure no nuclear tests go undetected, condemned Russia's step.
The treaty established a global network of observation posts that can detect the sound, shockwaves or radioactive fallout from a nuclear explosion.
It is part of a disturbing trend in recent years that has seen arms control pacts scrapped or suspended, he said last month on X.
The original article contains 492 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
I wonder where they are going to test those weapons. Maybe in Kyiv?
Great. Hopefully he ends the war soon, with the head of the corrupt Zelenski on a plate and a party with a lot of cocaine and hookers
Hmm... account created today, random user name, negative karma...
Just block and walk away. Don't even vote. Block and walk away.
Report, block, then walk away
The report is an important part to keep the community less filled with whatever they said before it got removed
Who the fuck cares. This generation was born with the threat of nukes and has lived with it the whole time.
Try harder boomer.