The writer has a clear bias and a lack of a technical background (writing for Techies.com doesn't count) .
You don't have to look hard to find devs saving time and learning something with AI coding assistants. There are plenty of them in this thread. This is just an opinion piece by someone who read a single study.
Somebody has been hitting the moon sugar a little too hard.
Great memory and great description of Shrinking. Also, take that! joke-stealing comic.
Lol you cared enough to respond. Sorry you're too stupid to hold a conversation.
Never said the study was bullshit. I just said to look at the bigger picture.
I would show you how Google works and provide an article, but your reading comprehension leads me to believe you'd come up with another straw man fallacy to support your confirmation bias.
"The only way to interpret statistics is with a healthy dose of skepticism and a thorough understanding of their context."
While people in this thread jump at the opportunity for this slice of statistics to affirm their confirmation biases, intelligent people will ask what the total carbon dioxide output looks like by comparison.
Bernie should have been president.
You know very little about the stock market. You should read up on the OTC markets.
They're not intelligent enough to realize their arguments are outdated.
By your definition stocks are also a pyramid scheme and everyone knows it. The more people that buy it, the price goes up! Sell? The price crashes! What a revelation!
What matters more than the genitals in your pants is the amount of money you have. If you have money you can buy politicians, judges, housing, food, weapons, armies, and the list goes on. If you have a dick and no money, you're nothing but a homeless person with no power at all.
Wait till this guy learns how a theremin work.