this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
677 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19159 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Schoolyard bully-rapists covering each other while burning their dads' fortunes (and the world, but that's merely a side effect, who cares)... How depressing

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Traitors be treasoning

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The richest Americans are above the law.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 41 points 1 week ago

Investigate the shit out of this man. Strip him of his wealth and citizenship. Deport him.

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 50 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A note about Taiwan. Allegedly, Putin asked Musk for a favour for Xi - to refuse Starlink for Taiwan.

Coincidentally, negotiations between Taiwan and Starlink broke down. The Guardian reported about it on October 15:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/15/taiwan-to-have-satellite-internet-service-as-protection-in-case-of-chinese-attack

"Starlink is not available in Taiwan after negotiations reportedly fell apart over Taiwan’s requirement that a local entity have a majority share of any joint venture established."

A person experienced in investigating such matters would take a look at the ownership structure of other Starlink local representatives, and see if Taiwan had unusually harsh demands or Musk was unusually stiff while negotiating with them. If Taiwan had harsh demands, it is plausible that no favour was done. If Musk was unusually stiff, then it's plausible that the favour was done as requested.

[–] moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This dipshit is a danger for the human being on earth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

He’s going to play the victim when he’s stopped. But the fact is that he always had the ability to turn to the nuclear superpower he swore allegiance to when he became a naturalized citizen.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 213 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Remember when Elon made himself a ... "hero" by providing starlink to Ukraine? But that the system when down specfically at the start of certain operations.

Fucking wild that Elon still has goverment contracts.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 84 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes. He's trying really hard to be a D-list Bond Villain.

[–] Bohurt@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] nomous@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But I like dorks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vxx@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (7 children)

putin be like: I have the epstein tapes. Do what I tell you or the whole world will see you banging minors

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Like genuinely,

If there are Epstein tapes, with video evidence of Musk or Trump or Prince Harry (or Gates or Soros or whoever) having sex with children, will there be any consequences?

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As in for everyone? As these kid diddling failups squirm and concede ground to an obvious kleptocratic fascist?

Yes absolutely.

As in for them personally when the tapes are released?

No, not particularly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if Putin had his own similar operation, only using state-level power instead of just money to recruit girls who could take the driver's seat and bring unsuspecting Johns back to hotel rooms rigged up with cameras anywhere in the world instead of needing to do it all on an island or at his home address.

Followed later by threats of releasing the footage (stick) vs promises for more similar episodes (carrot), though with the understanding that those carrots will be used as more sticks if they don't cooperate.

I think about that scene in Borat 2 where Rudy Giuliani clearly thinks the interview is really about sex and proceeds without a second thought about the camera. I also think about how he completely imploded his career, reputation, and maybe life by fighting a legal battle he knew had no merit (and maybe even deliberately sabotaged because, while he liked the sex, he might have actually had qualms about enabling a Trump coup... Like four seasons landscaping, seriously? Not knowing basic court procedures after his career was based on prosecuting the Italian mafia?).

Just a hunch anyways, probably nothing.

Edit: wording

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I dunno, they threaten to release a video of me banging a hot Russian chick? Go for it.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oops, I forgot to mention that the women are actually underaged, which isn't revealed until after the deed is done and could even involve giving someone who is of age paperwork making it seem like they are underaged or even just lies without paperwork.

Or another angle is you might be married and the threat is to ruin your marriage and expose you as a cheater (which can also ruin personal and professional relationships outside of your marriage).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Come on now. If they want to blackmail you, they can adjust the scenario in various obvious ways to make it far filthier than that.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago (12 children)

*or Tesla share price will fall slightly

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 150 points 1 week ago (3 children)

He is just so fucking weak-minded. He got cyber-bullied by Putin. He turned into Trump's lapdog. And the next day he gotta fire random employees of his to feel in control again. Piss baby aptly describes his state of mind.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There’s most likely some kompromat

[–] Krzd@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have you looked at him? His whole personality is kompromat.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Gasp what if they reveal that he's a terrible person??

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Piss baby because of that ketamine bladder?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Juice@midwest.social 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Putin seems to make implicit threats every time he opens his mouth, and I'm sure Musk's "I'm a very dangerous crazy loose cannon billionaire" that is such a huge part of his public image, even -- maybe especially -- with heads of state, went over extremely well with an actually very dangerous guy who tames loose cannon billionaires as a part of his actually very dangerous job.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Plus something tells me manufacturing leverage on a drug-addicted autistic isn't much of a stretch for Mr. Polonium.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 101 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Elon Musk is another Epstein island piss baby

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They don't need any dirt on him, he's a fucking coward. All they have to do is point to the window, ask him if he is familiar with the term "defenestration" and assure him he will become intimately familiar with it unless he starts behaving the way Moscow wants. Yet another reason billionaires should be taxed out of existence like they used to be.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 108 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Isn’t this a violation of the Logan act?

[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 135 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Laws are optional in America*

*Terms and conditions apply. Poor people not eligible. Large sums of money due at signing. Brown people subject to extreme scrutiny.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

†Large sums of money not necessary if you can convince a couple banks you are worth large sums of money.

‡The threat of crippling high powered lawyer-based lawsuit still applies.

Following the law is for poors.

[–] DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Threats, from the Latin meaning, "large sums of money."

Fuck these people.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Tbh I think it was more like eel on musk thought he was a hot-shit big boy and immediately got leveraged when he tried to play in Putin’s ballpark. That’s pretty much Putin’s MO, after all.

[–] DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly, whatevers clever at this point. All this bullshit right in our face, and all we can do is suck in it. I agree with you, though. I just pray the African American women of Georgia save this country again.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Imagine being such a fucking wimp that you commit misdeeds that will lead to not being mourned by your children.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›