this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
130 points (97.1% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35059 readers
507 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Didn't this stupid website used to help you, you know, hack life or something?

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JTode@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There was a time when Lifehacker was a place you could go for neat little things that could be accomplished with objects at hand to make life easier. There was such a time for many, many places on this great Internet of ours.

[–] chili1553@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was lit when it was Gina and crew.

[–] JTode@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It really was, I have a clear recollection of it being one of my top sites for a good year or two. Then the bad times came.

[–] BromSwolligans@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Anything that is, or once was affiliated with Gawker / GMG is, in its current state, a cringe-inducing, shambling husk of whatever it once was. My muscle memory still directs me to a number of those blogs and everyday I recoil at what has become of them.

[–] Maturin@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

RIP AV Club

[–] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm, I wasn't around for old Kotaku, but I think Kotaku still posts some good stuff? Or are they not Gawker?

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kotaku is close enough to gaming "journalism" that it's never really been good.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I like most of what Jalopnik has at least.

[–] housepanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lifehacker is just click bait shit now. Once upon a time in a far away land it was good.

[–] christophski@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago

Lifehacker got me into everything tech 15 years ago. It is nothing like it used to be, it's very sad.

[–] Tsaot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I unsubscribed when they had an article about how rimming isn't unsanitary and how to do it properly. I cannot describe how grossed out I was.

[–] icdmize@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought you were kidding. What the hell kind of lifehack is this? https://lifehacker.com/how-to-eat-ass-1820805658

[–] Curmuffin@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago

I mean butts are great and all, but they tend to REDUCE my ability to get things done.

[–] BloodForTheBloodGod@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I enjoy receiving but wouldn't give personally. Nerve endings.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m a both absolutely yes. As long as the person is hygienic overall. Not like, just outta shower clean, fuck that. They just have to wipe properly.

It's incredible how low of a bar that is, yet tons of people still don't know how to clean their ass after they shit.

[–] Dekthro@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It used to be pretty good, but that was over ten years ago now.

[–] username_unavailable@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Gosh, remember TechTV before the G4 merger? Between Call for Help & The Screensavers, I learned SO MUCH.

[–] dewritochan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

i remember ZDtv before TechTV.

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] Obsession@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Every time I drive by Laporte street in my neighborhood, I remember

[–] Nommer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I used to browse it about 15-20 years ago.It used to be a good place to learn tricks about all sorts of electronics. I'm not sure exactly what happened but it was like a switch flipped and they got awful almost overnight. Probably bought out.

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately everything is an ad now. It's the only way these sites are capable of surviving.

[–] mayo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I feel like I'm turning into 'that guy' again but cryptocurrency could help this out.

a) connect wallet to lifehacker

b) have fractions of a cent taken out to unlock articles

I know people can bypass it/copy paste, but at the end of the day it would be another source of revenue. They are surviving as is, but barely.

[–] FriendlyBeagleDog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like you'd be interested in the Web Monetization API, if you're not already aware of it.

[–] mayo@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Very cool thanks for sharing. I need to discover more projects like these.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

would people use a lifehacker community here?

[–] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If it had actual life hacks, probably.

If you hack out your butt you can poop out your front I hear

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This post reminded me of how much I miss the Consumerist website.

[–] skullone@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Oh wow. Totally forgot about them. The internet is such a shit hole now. (Except for lemmy and tildes of course =P)

[–] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

It was a public site associated with consumer reports. They occasionally released some product research in various areas, but mainly they wrote stories about shitty anti consumer practices that companies did. They also ran the worst company in America competition and sent the winner a golden poo trophy.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Lifehacker has one good article a week. At the end of the week. It's one where they debunk a bunch of bullshit rumors floating around the internet at the moment.

So I check them once on Fridays.

I'm guessing, with the way G/O media is going, that they'll get rid of that.

The good old days of Lifehacker are long gone. What it is now is an insult to its memory.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I mean, it was a pretty cool website like 20 years ago.

[–] brock@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

That ship sailed a very long time ago.

[–] wozomo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The only good Lifehacker articles are old Lifehacker articles.

[–] kratoz29@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any alternatives you recommend?

[–] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Heck if I know them. Anyone else? ^^

[–] Hello_there@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

There was once a related website called tree hugger. All the articles were about things you could buy with an eco focus of some kind.
It was neat to see stuff about solar powered radios, but pushing consumerism that much for that purpose misses the point

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like someone needs to setup a Netflix-type deal for news sites. I'm not going to pay a news site that I only view an article or two a month from. And there's a bunch of them. So it'd be neat if I can pay one price and access them when I need to.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Apple News+ is kind of like that

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Apple does some things well but wraps it all in one of the worst systems designed for people. It's like a slaughterhouse that takes good care of its cattle.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

But purposely excludes anyone who hasn't invested $2000 in the apple ecosystem. Anything made by apple is a huge no from me, even if they decide occasionally to support hardware they didn't already profit from directly.