this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
75 points (96.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35786 readers
1608 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I assume you can't go to real court over something like this.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

This is literally what organized crime does, it's like the cops for criminals.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 70 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is why you go with the assassins guild. They ensure it gets done, because their reputation is on the line.

Just saying.

[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This. It's always worth the extra silver to go with an established guild. Never worth the risk to take a chance hiring an assassin from Craigslist.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Considering that Craigslist is all a bunch of feebs moonlighting, contract disputes can get uncomfortable.

[–] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Wow, feeb is a great insult. Holding on to that one.

Excommunicando

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, you can't go to real court. You're actually kinda getting at something more serious: This is true for all crimes. Especially also drug crimes. That is why the prohibition of drugs causes violent crime: the only way to enforce contracts over illegal drugs is through violence.

[–] _thisdot@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think US tax department explicitly states that you must state any income you obtained through illegal means in your tax returns.

[–] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Is the implication here that if you don't state it then you owe back tax on illegal gains when they catch you?

[–] StormCamper@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fun fact: In Austria, a contract killer has been found guilty of fraud this year because he didn't kill his target.

[–] fraksken@infosec.pub 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fun for the survivor I guess... Do you have a source? I'd like to learn more about it.

[–] StormCamper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only German ones, and they don't go into much detail: 20min.ch

[–] fraksken@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago
[–] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

John Wick.

Or maybe the Ian McShane character person..

Or the adjudicators that made JW an outcast in three (was it?).

Yes, the adjudicators.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The real answer is you can't actually contract for illegal things, the contract is void from the start.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

Tell that to the tiefling with vial of the killer’s blood underneath the Moonkeeps Tavern…

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Eh, the kind of thing you're asking about is essentially fiction. Not that murder for hire isn't a thing, it's just that it doesn't work like anything you've read or seen in movies. It's one of those things where if you aren't part of a criminal enterprise, you aren't going to be able to hire someone, and you'll be hiring them from someone else in the same network.

So, in any semi realistic situation, there won't be any arbitration or argument. You fail, you fuck up, you die. Or, I guess, turn state's evidence, which is where what little about actual "contract" killing that's known comes from. It isn't like an actual contract.

Now, in fiction? Tons of options. Likely, you'd have whatever head of the crime network making the decision, maybe with other heads, maybe solo.

But, again, the term contract killing isn't exactly about a contract. There's not a formal arrangement involved. It's contract in the meaning of hired.

[–] ora@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Dang I hope was hoping in addition to the black market, there was an underground judicial system.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

I'm not sure if it would be better or worse, but even in places where organized crime is stable and relatively low key, there's not much in the way of cooperation.

Like, in the city I used to work in, the drug trade was pretty much owned by one group, gambling by another, moonshine by a third, and if you wanted guns, you tended to deal with the drug guys, but that was because they had outside deals with one or another of the cartels (I have no clue which) where they could get more than just the same stuff you could buy on your own legally (but would probably buy a stolen one if you were looking for something for a reason). This meant that they ran the trade de facto, despite it not being something they cared about if someone else sold guns here and there.

Now, the cartels did have people that were killers. But not hired guns, so to speak.

But those groups didn't really communicate. There weren't regular meetings to divvy up the city's vices or anything. They just didn't fuck with each other because they weren't set up to handle other trades.

There were some Russians that tried to move in at one point, running heroin, but they went away. Went away being a euphemism for eating a bunch of lead salad, which is bad for one's longevity. Supposedly, and I was not involved in the shit at all, it was handled in house, nobody asked the cartel for any help. The cartel wouldn't have been willing to send their men up, fight some group anyway. They'd just wait and make deals in other ways. Not worth it in terms of risk/reward. They'd sell guns to the gang, but not manpower.

Again, supposedly, there was an Armenian gang that ran gambling at one point, and they got busted which opened up room for the mixed group to pick up the pieces. But that was before I paid any attention to any of it. Only reason I paid enough attention to pick that kind of stuff up was bouncing and doing security. The guys running shine liked to swing dick around bars sometimes, trying to play a protection bullshit, and the titty bars I bounced sometimes were fairly popular with them in that regard and because they could get free attention.

Also have a friend that made high interest personal loans for a few years, and he had to pay a cut to the guys running the gambling. I mean, didn't have to, it was just easier and safer. One of his uncles was a moonshiner, so he knew some of those guys as well.

From what I gathered, that's the way most cities operate. There may have been a time when there was more broad organization, but afaik, that was dying out in the eighties.

However, pretty much any city of any decent size has some kind of organized crime. It's just a matter of how big the group is, and how much they control. Some places, you'll have one of the national level gangs running things, others it might be all small groups running territories within a city. Shit, it isn't just cities. The drug trade is like that out here in the boonies. Only difference is that you run into specific types of drugs being handled by a group. Locally, there's a bike "club" that more or less runs the meth and pills, but weed is a free for all, and coke is really only for making crack, which is spread all over.

Anyway, that's going way off topic. The point is that there's rarely any kind of cooperation at all, much less enough to have some kind of justice system in place.

[–] Makhno@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You do understand that the black market isn't an actual place/thing? It's just a term used for spaces that facilitate the trade of illegal goods...

[–] ora@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago

In the same way the black market is underground trade, so too would this court be an underground judicial system.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

It used to be, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Illegal contracts are not enforceable in court. You'll have to hire another contract killer to kill the contract-breaking contract killer.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What if it was a legal contract killing? Like, uh, I don't know, blessed by the pope or something

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Legal contract killing? Well if its a military contract then you get court martialed. If it's a "I sold my soul to trump" contract, you get fired... with a bullet in the back of your skull on 5th avenue, as the senate cheers affirming that that is indeed a legal execution.

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

You mean supreme court calls it a "presidential act"

[–] josefo@leminal.space 18 points 2 days ago

Gen Z really want everything handed to them. I remember the old times, there was no thing as a contract killer, if you hated your enemies, neighbor or the president, you had to kill them yourself. This generation doesn't know how to do that kind of stuff by themselves anymore.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The High Table sends an adjudicator with a special type of haircut. I think the hair style has a name, but I don't know it.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I read somewhere it's actually more common for a hired killer to turn the person who hired them into the police than for them to actually do the job.

In that same article, it said the average payment for a contract killer is less than $5000. So maybe if you're gonna hire a contract killer, you should not cheap out and get the one that requires a million dollars, with payment only on the death of the victim.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 16 points 2 days ago

I heard of some kid who made bank setting up a hitman website on the TOR network and accepting payment in Bitcoin. He just handed over the information straight to the police and kept the bitcoin.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 7 points 2 days ago

There's a website set up by a white-hat hacker to solicit work as a network penetrator. It has some odd name that's assassin related (contractkiller.com or something similar, I can't remember offhand). He set it up, and forgot about it. When he went back to it, a lot of the messages were people asking him to kill someone.

He sent all the info to the police, and left the website up. Now it's just a honeypot for people trying to have someone killed. I visited it a while ago, it's very tongue-in-cheek. But people are stupid and willing to believe anything.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 12 points 2 days ago

You get a contract killer to kill your previous contract killer. Duh.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago

Since you're outsourcing this, the adjudicator is either the first contract killer involved, or the second contract killer you specifically hired to deal with that first contract killer.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

... is the premise of the very worst John Wick spinoff.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nicolas Cage's The Wicker Man is the only John Wick spinoff worth your time.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nicolas Cage's The Wicker Man is the only John Wick spinoff worth your time.

  1. That movie is older than John Wick
  2. It's a remake of an even older movie
  3. Which is based on an even older book
  4. The plot has NOTHING to do with hired killers or anything John Wick related

Are you sure you didn't mixed up the movie?

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Think it's supposed to be a pun since John Wick and Wicker Man.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

You don't pay them then.

[–] jdw@links.mayhem.academy 7 points 2 days ago

Judge Dredd, obvi.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

This is the fuel underneath the 8 years long plot of Barry.

[–] Shameless@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I highly recommend watching this Australian TV show, Mr Inbetween, https://m.imdb.com/title/tt7472896/

Its based in fiction, but the guy who wrote it and starred in it attempted to tell the story somewhat close to what being a career criminal and hitman would involve. Its really well done and does demonstrate that being a divorced father and career criminal can be a difficult balance.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago

there are two legal options for a contract killer: military sharp shooters, and death pentaly executors. Both have options to deal with this. Both have strong limits on what contracts they will take though so probably not what you are asking.

[–] snowboardbum@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Your own gun.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

This is why I only hire Shelly de Killer.

[–] Atin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

John Browning

[–] palebluethought@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Contract killers don't really exist, and even if they did, it's obviously not covered by the legal system, so, you do.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are you asking on behalf of a friend?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Is the question time sensitive?

load more comments
view more: next ›