this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
1076 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

34778 readers
344 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 245 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] ForgetReddit@lemmy.world 123 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Turn them all into housing we desperately need

“But office building pipes aren’t set up for that!”

Okay so make communal housing/bathrooms for cheaper rent or invest in expanding the plumbing

“But that’s too expensive!”

More expensive than $800 billion??

[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 year ago

they'd never do that. then they'd be killing the housing bubble as well. think of the investors!

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OrkneyKomodo@lemmy.sdf.org 144 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds generally positive to me.

[–] shanghaibebop@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why not. Cheaper rent for ailing urban areas, and more incentives for residential construction.

[–] Tight-laced@kbin.social 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plus people commuting less = less pollution and less congestion.

Good for people, good for the planet, bad for profit for some.

[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

Yeah but less pollution in the sky means people can see the clouds, and that’s where my data is stored. 😡 I don’t want people seeing my data.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 115 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Convert it to affordable housing. You made a bad investment corporate America, kindly eat shit. If you need us, will be working, from home.

[–] ciapatri@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Nah let's just pump out more propaganda articles on why WFH is bad. /s

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] wheelie@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Time to practice the rugged capitalism that corporations preach. You want good workers? Follow them.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 112 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Alternative headline: remote work adds billions into workers' pockets and an immeasurable amount of happiness

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] davetansley@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess that explains why they're going to such great lengths to convince us that talking about Game of Thrones around a water cooler is such a tremendous benefit to humankind...

[–] Krakatoa@lemmy.film 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

At our office they are really pushing the "socializing" aspect by having a "gaming lunch" once a month. And by gaming lunch I mean they put out a few board games in the kitchenette that no one touches because we get 30 minutes to eat before having to work at a soulless corporation. But hey at least middle management is happy now they can walk around making sure you are working instead of being at home.

[–] davetansley@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

All workers are required to enjoy 30 minutes of mandatory social engagement at a designated "Fun Area". Enjoyment activities can include: hearty laughter, corporate value appreciation, appropriate camaraderie. If the enjoyment you wish to experience is outside of these allowed forms, please speak to your department's Enjoyment Adjustment Officer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Strange way to frame it. It sounds to me like businesses are saving $800 billion in unnessicary expenses.

[–] GildedGriffon@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Someone is holding that bag, though. Unfortunately for us, the people holding that bag have the kind of money to make our lives hell just for a fraction of a percentage point of value for their bottom line.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We were always going to pay for their failures; this one, or the next.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.ml 79 points 1 year ago
[–] superfly_samurai@lemmy.one 77 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who will think of the landlords?

[–] S_204@lemm.ee 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The government.... The government will think of the landlord's and your tax money will be the salve for the wounds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 73 points 1 year ago (26 children)

And there it is. This is the reason why so many companies are insisting on RTO. The C-level bosses are being pressured by their ultra rich friends who own the land to justify their high real estate valuations and rent so they can continue to make more money. They're happy to do it too... No compromise for them... Most of them are old conservative fucks that are probably angry at all the technology disconnecting them from their ability to interrupt their workers whenever they feel like it, so they can dump their stress, anger and frustration on their subordinates by reprimanding them without just cause.

It's the same old story, rich folks screwing over the common poors for their own selfish reasons to their own self-serving ends. Progress? No problem, as long as it makes them more money, costs them less in expenses, and gives them more power over the rest of us.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] MrsEaves@kbin.social 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Corporations: get your booty back into the office so it’s not empty
Also corporations: we’ve laid off your team in favor of AI, it was a tough but necessary choice due to costs
The empty office building: ???

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 56 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Come on you rich idiots, convert those offices into something useful and they'll be valuable again.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

And homelessness is on the rise. Whatever should we do?

I know! Ban homeless encampments! Yeah!

Edit: but first let's fire 15% of our workforce and then give ourselves a few million in bonuses.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 55 points 1 year ago

when my shit gets wiped out its "a market correction". let's see if this is "a market correction" or a "crisis" that requires federal intervention (read: a bunch of your money stolen at gunpoint and given to the people who made bad investments)

[–] mun_man@lemmy.fmhy.ml 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good. Developers can buy them on the cheap and renovate into living spaces

[–] electrorocket@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Most of the time it's more economical to tear them down than to convert them. The plumbing work needed is probably the most expensive part but then you only have windows along the outside walls. I suppose you could have large common areas in the center.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] konsumate@feddit.de 50 points 1 year ago

Finally something my generation can contribute to

[–] NovaPrime@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (28 children)

It's insane that we as a society are even having the debate between pushing capital investment strategies to adapt and come into the 21st century or dragging globally-distributed workers back to the 20th century just to avoid short-term pain and costs associated with updating outdated laws, tax incentives, and capital business practices.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] theragu40@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] taylus@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those poor commercial real estate investors

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Screwthehole@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hence why "they" are against wfh

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Indie@lemmy.fmhy.ml 36 points 1 year ago

Oh no!!!

Anyway.

[–] Transcendant@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Awesome, some of my favourite clubs were sold off to be used as offices. Can we turn them back into clubs now?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] grey@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 1 year ago

Let it burn!

[–] MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.one 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Maybe we could get them converted to residential units to get cheaper housing.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] KuroJ@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Yet they still want us in the office...

I work remote twice a week, which is nice, but I seriously wonder why I even have to go to the office the other three days.

Most of who I communicate with to do my job is not even in my location, so I'm regularly using Microsoft teams and WebEx. Also all the programs are accessible on my work laptop from home.

[–] Koalapottamus@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They are starting the force people back to work at my company. Apparently a location had a fight break out and police called because of an argument over a spot. There isn't enough room at these places so they were trying to make people go to an office an hour away instead.

If I were to go into the office I wouldn't have anyone else on my team with me. And if someone were to ask me to do work, I could have easily done it if they sent a message instead of walking by. I also don't eat lunch, so I would just work with headphones in. So I wouldn't contribute to the collaboration that is claimed to take place.

The only reason they want people back in the office is for that control. They don't want people having a good work/life balance. They want you to waste money on gas, time away from your family, and to eat out more often. It would be great if some states would prevent companies from forcing back to office.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] havilland@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago

Sounds more like an overvalued market that’s being corrected.

[–] TeddyBrosefvelt@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like a bunch of Herman Miller chairs are gonna be available for cheap

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago
[–] relevantnanana@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago
[–] thathoe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 year ago

That's all? Let's pump those numbers up...

The estimated total dollar value of commercial real estate was $20.7 trillion as of 2021:Q2.

  • some Google search
[–] WorldieBoi@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Aiming for a trillion.

load more comments
view more: next ›