this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
1076 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

34788 readers
344 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mun_man@lemmy.fmhy.ml 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good. Developers can buy them on the cheap and renovate into living spaces

[–] electrorocket@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Most of the time it's more economical to tear them down than to convert them. The plumbing work needed is probably the most expensive part but then you only have windows along the outside walls. I suppose you could have large common areas in the center.

[–] ironsoap@lemmy.one 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Economical perhaps, but this is the sort of stupid ass shit that epitomizes how fucked the growth based economy is in this climate changed era. Developer's think a few years down the road, but have no economic incentive to build it as a cradle-to-cradle build rather than a cradle-to-grave build.

Build the same damn curtain wall floor plans in a dozen cities, so they all look ugly and don't improve the quality of life, because it's cheap, makes short term money for people who already have more then they can spend, and leave it to the kids to deal with everything in the future... Grrrr {rant off}

Sorry, bitter old fart chiming in.

[–] BNE@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

No, you're alright, I think you're entirely justified to rant about that. We continue being a very short sighted species.

[–] zik@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the story they're selling but I don't think it really holds water. Sure, they'll have to remove the fitout and upgrade the plumbing and that costs money but no more than anyone would expect when building apartments. Some office buildings won't be suitable for residential use due to their shape and they obviously won't be converted but most are suitable and they'll be fine.

The business lobby pointing at the ones which are unsuitable and saying "but this whole thing is going to be impossible!" looks disingenuous to me. There are plenty of good options and there's no reason to expect they won't be converted.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These kinds of topics always get the "if it doesn't work for every single use case, it's useless".

This is a case by case kind of thing, each building should be examined and choose the appropriate new use for it.

[–] electrorocket@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Right, like masks don't stop all germs 100% of the time, ergo masks don't do anything.

They will turn into new jack city

[–] OptimisticPrime@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!