this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
497 points (98.6% liked)

politics

18930 readers
5279 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 3 points 20 hours ago

To think they found a position that is morally reprehensible from every possible angle, under all interpretations, and also involves bodily fluids, that's somehow amazing.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Next they will be tracking every time a girl takes a shit or walks outside. These people are sickening.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 50 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's a hop, skip, and a jump away from making them cover up head to toe in public and banning them from driving or being seen outside without a man.

The extremist terrorists were with us in the house the entire time.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well our yeehawdist gravy seals share another thing with other religious extremists.

Flags, trucks, needing to control women because they cannot otherwise get laid...

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

Legalized rape is the next likely step.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago

The GOP is the American Taliban.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago

Good lord, and I thought they went parodic with Homelander

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I cannot wait for Walz vs. Vance. Vance seems like what these people are, distilled. It'll be poetic to watch him get torn apart by a teacher

There's a great reason they are keeping him from doing real public events, and have instead opted to do these tightly controlled bits. He can't even do those and come off as relatable anyway, so the debate is going to be pretty wild.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago

the old "states' rights to impose their own laws in other states." because that worked out so well for them in the 1800s

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Has anyone been able to verify that he actually said this? The story stems from a Twitter post, and Miller apparently did do an interview on Newsmax on that date. But did he really say this? I'm suspicious because only that one source seems to be available.

NEVERMIND... Talking Points Memo noticed it also

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Snopes is going to have to update their article about this.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope people set up groups, if they actually make those departments, whose sole purpose is to cause as much damage to their servers as possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] comador@lemmy.world 95 points 1 day ago (5 children)

So long as they can also set up a semen surveillance department to prosecute men for leaving their jizz between couch cushions and fleshlights.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What a fucking psycho. Dude looks like he has a freezer full of chopped-up body parts at his house.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Stored as thin sample slices in binders, as tradition dictates

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Binders full of women, you say?

[–] innermeerkat@jlai.lu 51 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Jesus Christ USA, are you alright?

[–] shininghero@pawb.social 68 points 1 day ago (5 children)

No, we're not. Please send help.

[–] Invertedouroboros@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Fuck it, I'd welcome an invasion at this point provided whatever country did it super pinky promised not to do half the shit Republicans do.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

No, we are infected with lots and lots of xtian nationalist bullshit and an antiquated system that overly represents them. We need a system that allows us to ignore them since they are a minority - and let them bray as much as they like, but utterly powerless to tell anyone else how to live their lives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago

This needs to be a political ad in every swing state

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This article is clickbait garbage. What they said is SO MUCH WORSE, but calling it "Menstrual Surveillance" is fucking stupid. While menstruation and pregnancy are obviously related, they're not the same thing.

What they actually said is that they want to have states he able to monitor pregnancies so they can know if a woman becomes pregnant, but then suddenly isn't anymore, so they can question them for an abortion, either illegally in state or out-of-state. Given they're also pushing to monitor menstrual cycles alongside pregnancies, it's full on police state shit that goes even further than what is described.

Clear. Concise. Factual. That's all you need. The right already gives you what you need to show how fucked up they are. You don't have to clickbait. It's dystopian enough on its own.

[–] Reyali@lemm.ee 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Genuinely wondering: you say they are “pushing to monitor menstrual cycles alongside pregnancy.” How is that not menstrual surveillance? I haven’t dug into this myself but I’m confused by your comment and trying to understand better.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Having lived in the south, nothing about this is remotely surprising.

100% guarantee most neighborhoods are starting networks that watch local girls to try to monitor if theyre gaining weight and then take a trip, not that they need to be recruited, they're just idle pedophiles anyway.

Now they have something to threaten girls with for their silence...

[–] riskable@programming.dev 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Republicans are all about the nanny state. Tracking periods, banning books, deciding who gets to have what medications/medical treatments (instead of doctors), trying to control what websites publish, etc.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Except nannies are supposed to care for children, not persecute them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Government small enough to fit in your uterus.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

This is seriously fucking weird. "how often have you had blood exit your genitals this month, you filthy female" is not a question that anyone should be asking, especially the government. These freaks couldn't even point out anatomical features on a picture of a reproductive system (male or female, but especially female). Like bitch, of you can correctly label and describe the function of all the parts of a woman's sexual anatomy, them maybe you could have some input on the conversation, but even then you still shouldn't be making other people's decisions. Go fund some bridge repairs you vile little troglodites. JFC.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Miller replied, "Well, he's made it very clear that he's not gonna go and weigh in and try to push various states in how they want to go and set up their particular rules and restrictions. That's gonna be up to the states."

Just in case it wasn't clear, they belive that any level of tyranny is fine as long as it's state government doing it, not the federal government.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Only because they are less likely to control the federal government.

In the past they demanded free states enforce the fugitive slave act, and sent people into free states to kidnap free men into slavery.

[–] Anissem@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Handmaid’s Tale is a great show

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Started watching that with my wife last night. The rewatch angers the fuck out of me far more than it did in 2017.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Aren't these weirdos just ASKING to be sent tons of used hygiene products for their perusal? I'm sure if enough ladies volunteered, that would soon quench their thirst for knowledge about your bodily functions.

Or...they would totally get off on this. Yeah, it's probably a fetish.

[–] Zomg@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Seems Taliban-ish to me, which is sadly ironic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nemonic187@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This chinless taint stain looks like a canned ham got dropped on the floor of a merkin factory.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

I wonder how they would go about all this. Medical records will have to be divulged to the State so it can track who is pregnant. They'll have to outlaw home pregnancy tests, including buying them through the mail. Otherwise women could privately find out they're pregnant and go out of state for an abortion without the State knowing. They'll also have to monitor phone and email communications for everyone, not just the pregnant person, to make sure any attempt to contact out of state health providers is intercepted. Or maybe they'll just slap an ankle bracelet on pregnant women.

They'll probably also enact laws like the abortion travel ban that Amarillo, TX has on the ballot this November:

The ordinance, first proposed by anti-abortion activists, aims to forbid the use of the city’s roads and highways to seek an abortion out of the state. It would punish anyone aiding a woman seeking the procedure, including by providing funds or transportation, and be enforced through private lawsuits, similar to a 2021 state law that prohibited abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy.

[–] LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

menstrual surveillance departments

But why? This is information that can most certainly be gleaned from just about any data broker. Phone users cannot imagine just how much about their life is being meticulously catalogued and aggregated for ad tech networks.

The Trump team literally just needs to purchase the relevant aggregate data.

If you think I'm just being hyperbolic, btw there is software that can read your heart rate by the changes in red tonalities of your skin on camera, for example.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But why? This is information that can most certainly be gleaned from just about any data broker.

Obtaining the actual information is only part of the goal. The main reason is to create a perception in society that "you'll be found out" which goes toward the goal of removing autonomy of women and turn them back into only 'baby making machines'.

If you want to see how this plays out, we have an example from history, specifically what Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu did in 1967 making abortion and contraception outlawed:

From Wikipedia:

To counter this sharp decline in the birth rate, the Communist Party decided that the country's population should be increased from 20 million to 30 million inhabitants. In October 1966,[1][2] Decree 770 was personally sanctioned by Ceaușescu. Abortion and contraception[citation needed] were declared illegal, except for:

  • women over 45 (later lowered to 40, then raised again to 45).
  • women who had already borne four children (later raised to five).
  • women whose life would be threatened by carrying to term, due to medical complications.
  • women who were pregnant through rape and/or incest.

Enforcement:

To enforce the decree, society was strictly controlled. Contraceptives were removed from sale and all women were required to be monitored monthly by a gynecologist.[3]: 6  Any detected pregnancies were followed until birth. The secret police kept a close eye on hospital procedures.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

all women were required to be monitored monthly by a gynecologist.

At least we can rest assured on this point. As if a red state would ever make health care that accessible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

women whose life would be threatened by carrying to term, due to medical complications.

  • women who were pregnant through rape and/or incest.

Holy fuck a Romanian dictatorship had it better than some states in the US

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Two things:

  1. That guy looks like he's intimately familiar with video cameras and 1-way mirrors
  2. I wonder if that one southern Senator fond of underage girls has already volunteered to lead the program?
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 9 points 20 hours ago

10 years ago, this would be an Onion headline.

load more comments
view more: next ›