this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
952 points (94.6% liked)

Funny

6752 readers
375 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DABDA@lemm.ee 57 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Fuck, that's so good.

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 53 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"When did RATM become so woke???"

-- MAGA 2020

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 18 points 5 months ago

If you go back to 2012, Vice Presidential pick Paul Ryan listed RATM as his favorite band. At least the MAGA people are raging against something and they think it's the machine, but Paul Ryan was a technocratic dweeb who probably would've gotten shoved in a locker in high school if his dad wasn't rich. Paul Ryan was supposed to be smart, too, but i guess whether you're smart or not doesn't matter if you live in a fantasy world. You're doing to make a fool of yourself either way.

[–] Moops@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Some are those that work forces...

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And now you do what they told ya

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

FUCK YOU WONT DO WHAT YOU TELL ME!

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago

Also, I used to think it was 'Some of those ~~in~~ that work forces' TIL, better this way.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 16 points 5 months ago

It is irrational how much the misquoting angers me, but in my defense my brain keeps trying to sing the line in tune and it's the lyrics quote equivalent of one of those frustrating videos where someone cuts a cake wrong.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Those that work forces???

Can someone translate that for me?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Some of those that work forces

Are the same that burn crosses

They're saying that some of the people in powerful positions are racists who burn crosses. Burning crosses is a KKK harassment activity where they erect and burn a cross on the lawn of a black person's home while wearing masks to hide their true identity. Essentially they're alluding to systemic racism.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 13 points 5 months ago

(It is a Rage Against the Machine lyric from 'Killing in the Name')

I've had their discography on repeat for a couple weeks now, very much recommend

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

The police forces

[–] circuit23@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I can't find a source for this at the moment, but I read somewhere that the original line was "Some of those that hold office/are the same that burn crosses." It rhymes a lot better.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It does rhyme better, but why would they change that?

[–] circuit23@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

Radio stations wouldn't ever play the first way.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 12 points 5 months ago

There's only one type of protest that doesn't meet the full brunt of the governments monopoly on force -

White supremacists.

[–] TheControlled@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Cops shouldn't be shutting down non-violent KKK rallies and they shouldn't be shutting down "other" rallies either. It's everyone's right.

[–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah its all about free expression. Growing up i never really thought anyboby was racist where i lived. Then a few years ago there was a KKK rally which was 4 people. And the cops still had to defend them from people wanting to rightfully beat there ass.

I agree everbody should have the right to expressive there oppions. Even if in my oppion they are dubious and stupid. But at the end of the day, it should never be about what one person or group wants.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why did the cops have to defend them. Free speech applies to government censorship, not pissed off neighbours

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 5 months ago

The cops are protecting them from assault.

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They are the wooooooooorst of both worlds
Using excessive force, and then they light up the cross

[–] sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Or its because they have the right to assemble. Not saying cops are great or anything, but its absolutely a good thing they aren't shutting down events based on their opinion of the people who run the events.

[–] xanu@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Side eyes BLM protests, Free Palestine demonstrations and generally most left wing events that are definitely never unjustly broken up by police.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Those protests need to be heavily armed. It sounds radical, but that’s the proven method to avoid violently getting busted up.

During the civil rights movement, peaceful protests were violently broken, but armed protests were politely watched from across the street. Because cops have zero qualms about violently busting up an unarmed crowd, but get really fucking sweaty when the protestors can shoot back. It’s why the Black Panthers got started; People noticed the trend, and a group formed to arm protestors and stop them from getting busted.

It was so effective that it led to Reagan and the NRA passing the most restrictive gun control law the country had ever seen. The Mulford Act was quickly drafted and passed by republicans, to criminalize armed protests. Because lawmakers saw the armed protestors on their front porch, and saw the cops entirely unwilling to stop it.

Ironically, the reason liberal protests get busted is because they’re peaceful. White power rallies are always heavily armed, but liberals have a moral aversion to firearms so they have left themselves open to abuse.

[–] skulbuny@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

For some reason libs decided to give up firearms in hopes that the cops with guns would protect them... from cops with guns...

If you go far enough left you get your guns back y'all

[–] MockingMoniker@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

They only shut down illegal activity.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I

Or this person and a spelling bee.

[–] Murdoc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

You mean... she IS a spelling bee?!? 😲