this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
1084 points (99.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

52616 readers
227 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

LOL.

We pay for 4K, but we don't get more than 720p unless we use some proprietary shit hardware and agree to their super-invasive "privacy policy" - and they expect people to NOT set sail in the high seas? GTFO..

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 209 points 5 months ago (8 children)

I'm willing to pay for one, maybe two subscriptions, and ain't nobody got time to dig for which service has what show to find out season 2 is on some other service entirely.

Piracy provides a better user experience 🤷‍♂️

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 113 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem - Gaben

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (14 children)

I generally agree with him, but there are a lot of people who pirate simply because they don’t want to pay. And I’m not casting moral judgment here, i just feel like it bears mentioning lol “almost always” is pretty generous

[–] faintwhenfree@lemmus.org 35 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No it also means it's a service problem in the sense that it's not priced right for a geography. Pricing a game $70 where local average monthly income is $120 a month is a service problem. If you expect people from that geographic region to pay, the product should be priced within their means. And thus argument is valid only for digital goods where every new copy of the said goods costs mere few cents.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Lets compare three options as example:

One streaming service with everything:

  • monetary costs: 25 €/month
  • opportunity cost: login, type name in search bar, enjoy in good quality, language and subtitles of choice

Piracy:

  • monetary costs: 0-5 €/month (hardware/vpn)
  • opportunity costs: keep up to date with existing aggregator sites, take protective measures against identification, be wary of malware, limited scope of languages and subtitles, varying quality

Current streaming services:

  • monetary costs: 100 €/month or more, if you cover most services
  • opportunity cost: login to each service, look if they have the particular series/movie, be limited by region to which languages and subtitles you can use, have only certain episodes or certain seasons of a series, get a movie as a result, but actually have to pay extra for lending it...

People choose whether to pay monetary or opportunity costs. For a broke student priacy might still be the way to go, because they have time but not money. For most people a convenient streaming service will be the way to go though, because not having to worry about everything around and just finding your movie/series in 30 seconds, after you put dinner in the plates is the preferred option.

The current situation combines high monetary costs with high opportunity costs, so that piracy becomes attractive to many people, who would be happy to pay for a streaming service, that actually covers everything.

So i think "almost always" is perfectly applicable. Also keep in mind, that the offer of pirated stuff is directly related to the demand. if the demand reduces, so will the offer, which in this case would make piracy even less convenient. Of course the pricing matters, and if the one streaming service would cost say 50 €/month, more people would pirate again. But the dominant factor first is the service quality.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Steve@startrek.website 49 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Im willing to pay for two. It used to be netflix and prime, then hulu, paramount plus, disney…

Now its down to one- Proton VPN 🏴‍☠️

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NoneYa@lemm.ee 26 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I was fine with paying for Netflix. Then they started pulling shit off for their own services and I quit when there was nothing but the lame Netflix originals and some old shit I don’t watch anymore. One of the things that put me over the edge was when they would do things like put a sequel up but not the original.

How the fuck do you expect me to just jump into The Two Towers and not expect me to want to watch The Fellowship of the Ring first?! Oh you think I’m going to go buy/rent the first movie 😂 that’s cute.

No, I’ll just go back to pirating. Much more convenient to be able to say, watch an episode of The Office and then switch to a Marvel movie from Disney+ and then a Marvel show from Netflix without paying a dime to 3 different subscriptions and being inconvenienced to have to close and open a whole new fucking app.

Now I just spend money for a VPN each month. Less than what it costs for a single of any of those other subscriptions too and I can choose my quality and version and not worry about it getting removed tomorrow!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 20 points 5 months ago (3 children)

For the record, you can use justwatch.com and it will tell you exactly where you can watch it, and which seasons. But I'm still not paying for multiple subscriptions.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 5 months ago

Since #1 on the list is always The Seven Seas there's no reason to proceed further.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ad_on_is@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Hell, I even pay for a service that has all the magnet links resolved and ready to stream, no downloading involved. For 30 bucks (a year!) it's been the most convenient way of enjoying movies & shows.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] snrkl@lemmy.sdf.org 111 points 5 months ago (2 children)

https://www.gamesradar.com/gabe-newell-piracy-issue-service-not-price/

As Gabe Newell said: "Piracy isn't a pricing issue, its a service issue"

As my friend said: "every time a plastic video disc says " operation not permitted " a torrent is born...

As I say: "People will pay when it's easy, more reliable and more convenient." As a software product manager, I forbid my product from ever wasting developer cycles with copy protection.. It's expensive to deliver, annoying to real customers and doesn't make us any more money...

[–] Deello@lemm.ee 33 points 5 months ago

As a user of software, I salute you.

[–] saintshenanigans@programming.dev 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I don't disagree with anything but I feel like GabeN said that before streaming and subscriptions took over.

Photoshop is an incredibly easy to use and powerful tool for creators - I'd be happy to drop like $200 on, for example, the 2024 version. I'm not happy to spend $10 or $30+ a month for life to use it, especially when they lock you in to a year subscription and charge you a fee if you cancel early so you literally can't just sub only the month when you need it, it's the whole year, period. I'll just pirate or use photopea or whatever.

Similar for streaming. Netflix gave us the option to pay for more screens to watch on. Now suddenly it matters whose house it's in?? All while you're constantly removing value from the platform and you cancel anything decent if the production value is too high? Fuck you man I'm not paying like $30 monthly for that.

[–] snrkl@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 5 months ago

Please do keep voting with your wallet - its one of the few remaining ways to express our discontent!) That being said, I feel like both of those examples are where the service provided by adobe and then Netflix are terrible.

Adobe is making you buy a whole year and Netflix is hassling you for "letting your pensioner mum watch your account".. To me, both of those are examples of bad service (coupled with cost).

For me, a counter example for me is amazon.com: I hate what they're doing to the retail landscape but find it hard to resist, as I find them SOOO convenient, and their customer service (for now) is absolutely stunning!!! Now if their prices were too high, I'd personally probably pay for that convenience a bit. (Where there model breaks for me completely is warranty major purchases: I've had warranty denied by manufacturers for items purchased through non approved amazon resellers. So now, for me, anything over $100 and I'm looking for direct purchase from the manufacturer as a preference. )

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kbal@fedia.io 63 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

12% over four years? Damn. Somehow I had the impression that there'd been a significant increase.

Netflix revenue is up by roughly 60% in the same four years.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

Thank you for keeping things in perspective.

[–] SitD@feddit.de 10 points 5 months ago

if these two numbers were reversed, piracy sites would get the same treatment as videos with actual criminal content. we're lucky

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 63 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe people would pirate less if you let them keep what they pay for.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 44 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] sfgifz@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You're buying... A temporary permission to access certain content.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 33 points 5 months ago (4 children)

...then piracy isn't theft.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ratcliff@lemmy.wtf 52 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sometimes piracy is the only method of archival

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 27 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Some things are literally not available anymore by legal means. Piracy is an important tool in preserving content for future generations. Future historian will be proud of pirates.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Put everything on 1 or 2 platforms and take cuts depending on what people are watching.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FlavoredButtHair@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Well streaming prices have gotten ridiculous.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I stuck around with streaming for as long as I could but with the price increases, the restrictions, the lack of content as they revert back into cable bullshit has driven me back to getting the bulk of my stuff via torrents again.

Honestly, I'm pretty shocked that streaming remained decent for as long as it did but we all knew this was inevitable because we all know how this song and dance with greedy corporations go.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] asimpleman@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Paying up to 23$ a month (not including other streaming services) to watch maybe 5% of the shows and movies I'm interested in just didn't seem like a good deal after a while.

[–] AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Nope, you need more than 1 subscription, because quite often services only offer a few of the seasons of your favorite show, while the others are on different services.

Example: https://www.pokemon.com/us/animation/where-to-watch-pokemon-episodes-movies

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BobGnarley@lemm.ee 28 points 5 months ago

This is the number one reason I won't ever pay for a netflix subscription (or others) again. Pay for 4K but you dont get 4K if you want to watch on your laptop or android streaming box that they don't approve of. Like how much fucking greedier could you be? Fuck them I hope they all go the way of blockbuster soon.

[–] RedTie13@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

Those are rookie numbers! Let's pump it up!

[–] MaxPower@feddit.de 19 points 5 months ago (14 children)

1 of those 12% is just me lol /s

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago (7 children)

I get pissed at my family for being traditional hoarders but I somewhat inherited that as a data hoarder. The amount of stuff I have pirated over the years and not actually used or watched is hilarious.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 19 points 5 months ago (7 children)

When Netflix had (seemingly) everything I was totally cool and the gang with paying for that service.

Now I have:

  • Netflix
  • Amazon Prime
  • Apple TV
  • Disney+
  • NowTv
  • fuck knows what else

and I still can't find the content I want to watch. I had an urge to watch The Good, The Bad And The Ugly the other day. Could I find it on any services I pay a combined £50+ a month for? Could I fuck. Why would they be surprised they're pushing people to 'alternative' sources? Sure, I can rent or buy Barbie and Oppenheimer if I want, but I don't want. What I want is access to the tens of thousands of old, excellent, films that have been made.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] maus@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I can easily say that the amount of my friends and family that have become interested in my Emby setup has expontentially consistently increased every round that these streaming providers have increased their rates.

The experience of launching 7 different streaming apps to find something, content constantly vanishing or moving platforms, and just an overall poor user experience coupled with doubling/tripling of each platforms costs....

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 months ago (13 children)

The companies have almost successfully re-introduced the very problem that streaming originally solved.

It's like this dipshits don't want our money. I've always been firm that any content removed from streaming services is a message from that content company that they don't want the money of the customers subscribed to said service and thus are okay with those people pirating it instead.

If they cared about the money, they'd had left the content there.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 16 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Bold of you to think that they even think of us at all.

I actually mean that seriously: we continue seeing, over and over, that no, quite often they do NOT expect people to NOT do that, they quite simply DGAF. They pirate us, we pirate them, it becomes just another "cost of doing business", until they are strong enough to eventually crack down further. See ad blocking & Chrome recently, after multiple decades of internet ads pushing the limits.

It's like a zombie nom noming your brains - after like 2 bites it'll get bored and wander off, and it literally doesn't even need to "eat", it simply is so fucking DUMB that it doesn't know what else to do with itself. It is truly horrifying b/c while your entrails may be strewn about on the floor, or in the throats of tens of zombies, they in turn... don't even have the decency to be aware that you've died!?

Lower-level managers sell ideas to higher-level managers, and "logic" has little to do with those conversations, compared to the amount of emo-stroking that goes on "oh, you will become so rich, and powerful, and handsome, and brave, and precious" (from here:-P) - and so long as enough people play along, that happens!

Our world is just so fucking STUPID.

That said, what they do is on them, while what we do is on us. Find a way to live - hopefully by finding a way to contribute, if/where you can.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Piracy has changed so much. Back when people were making the transition from p2p to torrents there was very little if any streaming sites.

Nowadays if you sneeze hard enough you're bound to spray down some big name streaming service.

Now there are even whole front ends that allow you to stream whatever you want anytime you want even on a little, but very powerful handheld computer.

I would say that 12% is more on the low end. If you were to factor in ad blocking and the various front ends I mentioned earlier I could see that number going up much higher.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I fucking wonder why. When owning isn't owning them piracy is totally justified.

We pay for 4K, but we don’t get more than 720p unless we use some proprietary shit hardware and a

Not only that... you pay to get tv content and suddenly they remove it because of licensing or political correctness bullshit.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 24 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Not only that… you pay to get tv content and suddenly they remove it because of licensing

Preach!!

or political correctness bullshit.

Oh no

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

Always a tell tale sign when someone unironically drops a PC whinge.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wage_slave@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Not gonna lie, if you asked me what I would think the increase would be and I would have assumed it be a lot higher.

But then again, that could be the part of the pirate crew that doesn't use a VPN and is easily identified upon entering the site.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rengoku@social.venith.net 11 points 5 months ago

What you say is exactly what I feel.

When I pay for a service, as long as I abide by the ToS, service provider should give me their products in full.

Your protection should not violate my right.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 months ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›