this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
590 points (98.4% liked)

News

23262 readers
5390 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Iowa will not participate this summer in a federal program that gives $40 per month to each child in a low-income family to help with food costs while school is out, state officials have announced.

The state has notified the U.S. Department of Agriculture that it will not participate in the 2024 Summer Electronic Benefits Transfer for Children — or Summer EBT — program, the state’s Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Education said in a Friday news release.

“Federal COVID-era cash benefit programs are not sustainable and don’t provide long-term solutions for the issues impacting children and families. An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic,” Iowa Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds said in the news release.

A bipartisan group of Nebraska lawmakers have urged the state to reconsider, saying Summer EBT would address the needs of vulnerable children and benefit the state economically, the Journal Star reported.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 176 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Wait, did she just say some kids are too fat so they don’t want to feed any of them?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 52 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's how I read it too. I really hope not, but I'm also assuming this is a republican so probably.

[–] Feirdro@lemmy.world 49 points 10 months ago (3 children)

They literally believe that the gubmint is feeding poor children so much they’ve become obese.

Gah, i feel dirty when i see things from their pov.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's the charitable interpretation! The other way of reading it is that in reality some children are obese while others go hungry, but they can't be bothered to give a shit which are which.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Republicans not giving a shit about children. Quelle surprise.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ersatz@infosec.pub 105 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Haha, let's force poor women to give birth to unwanted children, and then take away the tiny crumbs we've been giving them. Governor, you're a genius!

This is a federal program. It costs them nothing. These people are fucked up monsters.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's actually not the case. Per the linked article...

States that participate in the federal program are required to cover half of the administrative costs, which would cost an estimated $2.2 million in Iowa, the news release says.

Of course, that's no excuse to turn this program down. Particularly since she also just announced that the state will "end Fiscal Year 2023 with a balance of $1.83 billion in the General Fund, $902 million in reserve funds and $2.74 billion in the Taxpayer Relief Fund." $2.2 million is a drop in the bucket when it would benefit so many needy children.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is a federal program. It costs them nothing

That's really the most fucked up thing. These are always states that already take far more from the federal government than they provide in taxes, and they complain as if they'd be the ones paying for this shit.

As someone who's in a state that gives far more to the US government in taxes than we take, I should have more of a say where that money goes, and I would prefer to continue giving aid to these children in Iowa. In fact, it should be more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rusticus@lemmy.world 91 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Meanwhile farmers in Iowa get the majority of their income off the fat teat of the US government. Go fuck yourself hypocrites.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 86 points 10 months ago (2 children)

An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic,”

Holy fuck... she's literally saying that your kids should starve because other kids are fat.

[–] groupofcrows@lemmy.ca 26 points 10 months ago

She probably meant - colored kids can starve because white kids are too fat.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It's such a weird hill to die on, too. We pay, what, 15k/kid per year of education? 120 bucks is too much, though.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 69 points 10 months ago (2 children)

“Federal COVID-era cash benefit programs are not sustainable and don’t provide long-term solutions for the issues impacting children and families."

"...so instead we the GOP are going to replace this unsustainable program with nothing making a future problem a problem of today!" /s

"An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic,” Iowa Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds said in the news release."

"While yes, EBT card is useful to buy all kinds of healthy food such as fresh produce, staples such as beans and rice, as well as great protein choices such as chicken, pork or beef, you may not be aware that EBT card can also buy sugar! And, you may not be aware, its possible for someone to consume enough sugar to gain weight. Therefore the GOP solution is to remove the EBT card which grants access to this sugar (as well as all the other food). By doing this those children that are overweight will effectively be put on a starvation diet where their bodies will slowly first digest their body's muscle and put their liver at risk by forcing ketosis. Those children that don't happen to be overweight, and will suffer tremendously, should have thought about that before they let all their peers eat too much." /s

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

I mean... do you need the /s when you're just de-politicizing the language and not changing the message?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 67 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Dear kid,

You will go hungry today because we will also let you starve tomorrow.

Also, you are fat.

Love, Republicans

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 63 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Some kids are fat so poor kids should starve?

Holy shit GOP.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

There's a very good chance the kids that are overweight are overweight in part because the parents can't afford better food as junk food is often cheaper. This could just worsen the problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HonorIsDead@lemmy.world 56 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I love when this happens and they present no alternative. Choosing a losing option instead of accepting an imperfect effort. Try to improve it? No surely not. Throw it all away. If a social program helps someone I deem unworthy of aid it must be removed.

How small of a person.

[–] ferralcat@monyet.cc 19 points 10 months ago

Their entire party is built around making their constituents angry at other people. Earnst us trying to enrage people because she's ameyeing a national positikn.

I think it's time to just call them on it. Everyone believes in feeding kids. It's not controversial. It's the ethical right thing to do. There is no disagreement between parties here. She's just doing this to try and stir up anger at "them/"others" because she thinks it will make a subset of people vote for her.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Repugnants: "We hate kids."

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s really sad because I grew up poor and relied on food assistance at school for a reliable meal during the weekdays. If I had to not eat lunch most weeks I think my childhood would’ve been arguably a lot worse

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

it's infuriating. And not "mildly" infuriating. this is full on, rage-inducing pisses me off. Fortunately, we're going the way up here; funding more free lunches.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago

And Jesus said, onto thee, fuck them kids.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 38 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"God, I want to hurt children so much." - Republicans

An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic,

Poor nutrition is when the poors have too much access to food. /s

She added, “If the Biden Administration and Congress want to make a real commitment to family well-being, they should invest in already existing programs and infrastructure at the state level and give us the flexibility to tailor them to our state’s needs.”

Read: "Give us money and let us cut taxes for our ultrawealthy donors yet again."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is so fucking stupid, not only does this feed kids the money goes to local retailers but a huge chunk also buys Iowa food products. What the fuck is wrong with that idiot

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 32 points 10 months ago (3 children)

“Federal COVID-era cash benefit programs are not sustainable and don’t provide long-term solutions for the issues impacting children and families. An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic,” Iowa Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds said in the news release.

Okay, so they have a better program they're implementing instead to address those issues?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Twelve million children are food insecure in the "Greatest Country on Earth™" and they want to cut spending to feed them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a state that needs to put more funding into basic education.

[–] donescobar@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

They are trying to abolish that too

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Surprise, surprise that Republican Christians don't give a fuck about the welfare of kids in poverty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 23 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Yikes

“In the end, I fundamentally believe that we solve the problem, and I don’t believe in welfare,” Nebraska Republican Gov. Jim Pillen told the Journal Star on Friday.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

I’m thinking this should be on his campaign posters so that families know exactly who to blame when they are put even further underwater.

[–] sparky1337@ttrpg.network 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So I guess even church run food banks are too communist.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No no those are ok because of the religious indoctrination and turning away people that are anything other than straight white christians

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

“Federal COVID-era cash benefit programs are not sustainable and don’t provide long-term solutions for the issues impacting children and families. An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic,” Iowa Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds said in the news release.

She added, “If the Biden Administration and Congress want to make a real commitment to family well-being, they should invest in already existing programs and infrastructure at the state level and give us the flexibility to tailor them to our state’s needs.”

They don't think the current program to address child hunger is sustainable. They are not replacing it with another program, are they? They're just going to let the kids go hungry?

And people vote for these assholes?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gazumi@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Evil intent dressed up as "this is good for you"

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I bet Matt Gaetz was disappointed to find out that this was what his Nebraskan pals had meant when they said they'd be screwing a bunch of kids during summer break.

[–] urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 10 months ago

My sister in law works in a fast food restaurant. My niece (9 years old) primarily eats fast food for this reason. My SIL gets a discount, she doesn’t have to cook or go anywhere else. To her it’s a way to save money. My niece is slightly overweight and doesn’t like fast food anymore.

Food stamps would help, but nobody can get them to reach out for help. They feel ashamed for some reason.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Republicans every single day you endeavor to be the biggest assholes around- why dont you do everyone a favor and TAKE A DAY OFF?

[–] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 16 points 10 months ago

Oh goodness me no! Why would you want to do that?!? I mean doing something like feeding poor kids is only a hairsbreadth away from total communism.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Evil ghouls that are in power need to feel unsafe. They are too comfy with doing harm to working class/poor people.

[–] iquanyin@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

We’re on the bad side of literally every issue. we’re the GOP!

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

These are the same people who pretend to worship Christ but Trump is their new messiah.

[–] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Absolute ghoul in the thumbnail

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 13 points 10 months ago

Finally someone is standing up against. Checks notes. Free school Lunches! Wait what?

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is just the, "Don't feed strays. They won't leave if you do." Except they think poor people will magically find the money to move.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›