MotoAsh

I keep telling people that capitalism only has innovation in ONE direction. They never listen... That direction is shit. Capitalism is enshittification.

Yes. Stop using Google services.

Why is that the answer? Because Google WANTS you to use it, and it is not illegal to force you once you're searching with them.

rofl! The difference vetween a progressive and liberal is NOT just when they decide to intervene in corporations...

American liberals want to means test EVERYTHING that could concievably go to a poor person. A progressive realizes the red tape is fucking stupid and expensive in its own right. Remember the COVID funds? Sucked up by megacorporations more than small businesses like it was supposed to be for? Notice how American liberals didn't go after those corporations or really care that the money instantly dried up for smaller fries?

Yea, American liberals are ABSOLUTELY closer to American conservatives in practicality. It doesn't matter how many polite words they use if the end result is FUNCTIONALLY THE SAME. No, conservatives wouldn't have given any money to poor people, but as already said, liberals didn't care that corporations with lawyers that could push all the red tape got the money, not small businessesthat actually neededrhe help.

They BOTH serve to drain the government of public funds. You've just fallen for the pleasantries they put on the same negative slant of actions. No, liberals are not fascists themselves, but they're always, always dumb enough to make things suck enough that fascists sound nice to fools.

IMO, the most important parts are to document the actual intent of the code. The contract of what is being documented. Sure, it's only so useful in perfectly written code, but NO code is perfect, and few will come through later with full context already learned.

It makes it sooo mich easier to know what is intended behavior and what is an unchecked edge case or an unexpected problem. If it's a complicated thing with a lot of fallout, good documentation can save hours of manually lining up consequences and checking through them for sanity.

You might say, "but that's indication of bad code!". No. Not really. Consequences easily extend past immediate code doing things as trivial as saving data to the database without filtering, or having a publicly available service. Even perfectly coded things come up with vulnerabilities all the time due to underlying security issues. It's always great to have an immediate confirmation of what's supposed to happen whether it's immediate code or some library with a new quirk in a new version.

Very good point! I just wanted to point out the stupidity of even remotely implying other countries don't try to tackle this issue in MUCH better ways.

I'd even argue that shutting down speech is specifically not "trying to solve" it. At all. It's literally deciding to not talk about it. Few problems get better when they cannot even be freely discussed...

In addition to what others have said, other countries HAVE tried things, and they do work. Things like the child tax credit and direct subsidies bump things in the right direction. Imagine if they required pay to keep up with inflation and actually required companies provide adequate maternity and paternity leave...

I dunno', this one's quite a bit worse. 100 situps, pushups, and squats aren't exactly easy like doing the alphabet. At least if someone did Saitama's exercise, they would be in decent shape, just not a well balanced in shape.

All they have is their IP, which they keep shitting on. The unique Ubisoft "innovations" are a shittier launcher and removing games from people who paid for them if they don't play.

Nobody should want to buy that shitshow except to gut it for IP.