this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
116 points (88.2% liked)

Games

16645 readers
591 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 54 points 11 months ago (3 children)

But will it still be plagued by their lazy mission design and gross monetization?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They've normally been pretty good about keeping that shit away from the single player side of things.

Couldn't give a fuck about multiplayer, they can sign people up for medical experiments in exchange for funbucks for all I care. That side of it just doesn't interest me at all. If I wanted to be called a homosexual slur by an eight year old I'd go to the park.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Kids just don't randomly yell Hurensohn at strangers in the park like they used to, must be why MMO is successful

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Metal_Zealot@lemmy.ml 40 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No gameplay, no hype, thems the rules

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

IMO, no reviews, no hype.

[–] OscarRobin@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

I feel like I'm the only person who wasn't blown away by the graphics.

Like sure it looked really good, but it still looked like a videogame, on the same level as 3yo last-gen Last of Us 2

[–] UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The graphics are relatively current gen, but I'm more excited about the unique looking NPCs and scale of the game.

[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Scale is definitely what I'm looking forward to. Current graphic fidelity has hit the ceiling in terms of lighting. High resolution ray trace only lighting is still out of reach but they did redo global illumination so it scales better.

[–] 9715698@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

TLoU2 is a linear experience made of sections with plenty of loading in between vs an open world.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 11 months ago

Right, and we're a generation of hardware on from that.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not even comparable to rdr2... which came out in 2017 . The characters\npcs look like cartoons lmao

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 19 points 11 months ago (9 children)

It's just a different art style, there are a bunch of technical improvements over RDR2, such as:

  • NPC density (dance club, beach, etc)
  • urban lighting and reflections (esp. on cars and buildings)
  • hair animations (guy standing on green truck, white bikini girl whipping hair)
  • high render distance in model-dense areas (e.g. beach scene w/ details in the distance)

It doesn't seem to be going for realism, but it does seem to be adding a ton of tech.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Npc density is what impressed me. Especially if they all are actually doing stuff beyond just walking straight.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

For some reason, that beach scene really impressed me. There were tons of static models, lots of NPCs all doing different stuff, and the updated hair animations seemed to still be working (hard to tell though). It just looked really good, especially compared to similar scenes in GTA V that were pretty much empty.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

No horse balls? Skip

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 36 points 11 months ago (5 children)

[x] doubt. If that was true that would of been a gameplay trailer

[–] Marafon@sh.itjust.works 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Agreed, however even if it can feasibly look like that it will never look that good on my computer.

[–] lechatron@lemmy.today 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because it's not releasing on PC?

[–] Marafon@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

😢 I didn't realize they were still doing that dumb shit...

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Rockstar giving the middle finger to PC players is one of the few constants in the gaming universe.

[–] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The trailer is full of artifacts that are common with modern game graphics techniques. The hair on the girl at the roof top pool is the easiest place to identify this. It has that shimmery pixel effect that is common with frame reconstruction like FSR or DLSS, not sure what they've implemented here. Probably FSR since it's a console first target. It's definitely in engine footage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShadowCat@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)

In fairness, their first trailers for the past 2 GTA games haven't been gameplay, so I assume they're just keeping with that pattern. And also those trailers did look similar to the final game, not exact but I don't think it's much of a stretch to expect GTA VI to look this good on max settings.

Framerate on the other hand, maybe to look this good it'll have to be 30 which won't be nice

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah, the video is 30fps, and seems to be captured at 1440p given the stair-stepping on some of the surfaces. Though that's reading quite a bit into a short clip, so we'll see.

[–] gila@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

It's the mocap/animations. Every character in every scene in the trailer is fully mocapped. Crowds dancing in sync together at a club, reacting to eachother on the beach, parking on a busy street and exiting cars. I'm sure some of it is in the game, in scripted encounters. Probably not random sandbox gameplay people think of when they think GTA

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Knusper@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago

Yeah, maybe it could look like that, but obviously they haven't actually implemented everything to make it look like that, so it's still completely up in the air, whether it actually will look like that.

[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Would’ve

Not a big deal but it’s would have, not would have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 25 points 11 months ago

I mean it didn't look like anything that couldn't be done in realtime

[–] amio@kbin.social 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it looked basically like something a talented modder could put into the GTA 5 engine (followed, I'm sure, by an instant cease-and-desist or lawsuit by Take2) so... yeah, I'm sure it is. Big whoop? GTA 5 looks OK but it is also ten fucking years old.

[–] neidu@feddit.nl 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If true, those are some pretty impressive graphics. However, I suspect it'd come at the expense of controls feeling sluggish - realistic animation means your character won't instantly move when you push the button/key. As nice as GTA5 and RDR2 looked, I found the perceived input delay annoying as fuck.

[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yup. If it's not fluid it's a major deal-breaker for me

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Well yeah, it didn't look that amazing. It's hardly photorealistic.

It looked pretty much exactly what I'd expect a modern PS5 GTA game to look like.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The graphics looks realistic, the movement gives it away that it's a game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

That game looks unreal and intense

[–] yokonzo@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Oh please rockstar, I've heard this dozens of times in the past

[–] Rosco@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Does people still trust empty promises like this?

[–] yads@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

Wow trailer looked great, but I definitely said to myself that this could just be prerenders

load more comments
view more: next ›