this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
227 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39034 readers
2836 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] radix@lemmy.world 95 points 11 months ago (2 children)

the entire government will be using [Olvid], the world's most secure instant messaging system," French digital minister Jean-Noël Barrot confirmed on X.

Clearly they're very discerning when it comes to their choice of communication apps. 🙄

[–] F4stL4ne@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Why dont they use SimpleX?

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Simplex is promising, but not ready for primetime.

On my divest OS phone it doesn't even run. Just launches and dies.

Contact Discovery is still a big issue, simple x doesn't have a solution for that yet. You have to do out of band manual addition of your contacts.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No Contact Discovery is a feature for me.

Interesting it does not work on your device, I have tried it on a few different phones and have not had any issues. My friends are of course using it as well, all on different devices.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

https://github.com/simplex-chat/simplex-chat/issues/3184

Appears to be a known issue

WRT Contact Discovery, if your a large organization like... the french government, you want your people to be able to communicate with each other, so they need to solve contact discovery if you really want them to adopt and use simplex for their communication.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] F4stL4ne@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

It can be can be, some French person just have to fork it.

[–] Cossty@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

From their Google play store page: "Olvid is the first private instant messaging application for everyone."

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

https://github.com/olvid-io

At least it's open source, so we should know soon enough how it compares to Signal

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

the client is open source. but the server? not so much.

in any case, if security is the concern... they should probably switch to a government-built system that only runs on gooberment devices. Will it be shitty? absolutely. But data is owned by whoever has the hardware it sits on. if it's not your device its not your data.

[–] cmder@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago (2 children)

French here. It is all about the IT sovereignty (souveraineté numérique). The idea is to use French solutions in order to limit leaks if confidential information and dealing with other country without worrying about threat of limiting, stopping critical services. Also it is easier to apply EU laws like GPDR. That is why all the French private company dealing with sensitive information (military, cyber security..) are only using French solutions.

[–] XpeeN@sopuli.xyz 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I get it, but I just don't get why wouldn't they just follow other govs' steps and just set up a matrix server instead. It's already available and proven.

[–] interceder270@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

💶 Money.

French companies will now get contracts and profit off of taxpayer dollars.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That’s good. Domestic spending is the best way for a government to stimulate the economy.

[–] interceder270@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's not good if it doesn't result in a better deal for the public.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

How is this a bad deal for the public? Tax dollars go directly to the local market and the only people who have to change their behavior are those voluntarily seeking employment in the government.

It’s a complete win.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because sometimes that only results in worse features with more overhead. Not everything is interchangeable with the press of one button.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The harm is negligible and the benefit massive. This is an obvious win for the French people.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago

You have no idea how complex it is to develop E2EE software. At least they could go with self hosted Matrix (in fact they already do in some departments!). Matrix is even designed to be extensible!

[–] interceder270@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Because they could be paying more money for a worse product or service.

It's not beneficial to take a worse deal just because you're making domestic people richer instead of foreign ones.

[–] eliasp@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago

That's actually what they're doing. They built their own messenger based on Matrix.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

What security vulnerabilities does Signal have? I implore them to find a more secure messenger.

Edit: Apparently they're using Olvid. Claims to be the most secure messenger. Only the clients are open source, not the server code and they're using a whole different algorithm. I seriously don't understand why they don't just partner with Signal, bet these guys don't even have Signal's level of quantum resistant encryption.

https://github.com/olvid-io

[–] seSvxR3ull7LHaEZFIjM@feddit.de 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Olvid is French and Signal isn't, which seems to be très important.

[–] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Plus for the French Government it's easier to twist arms in France than in Switzerland.

[–] dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Plot twist: maybe whatsapp, signal and telegram are harder to hack, maybe olvid has back doors that allows them snoop on each other 🤔

(am only half joking 😉)

[–] ANIMATEK@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I think that it has to do with GDPR. Signal has servers outside the jurisdiction of France or the EU. This app probably not.

Not that I agree though. Signal would be a better option.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 16 points 11 months ago

It's a really big problem for ministers using private messaging services. All of this is supposed to either be public domain or secret. If it's labelled as Secret it should be officially secret, not just "we didn't tell anyone about it".

Accountability and transparency are cornerstones of democracy.

[–] Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

How about GApps tho? You know, the piece of spyware Google embeds in Android's system partition?

FYI:
Private open source alternative to it,
is MicroG

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Micro g is still downloads Google proprietary blobs and runs those. So it is not open source so much as it's an open source launcher of Google's proprietary software. It's an interesting improvement, but it does not a panacea it does not fix the issues

[–] buskbrand@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Are you sure? I thought that what you describe is what packages suck as NikGapps did, while MicroG is a reimplementation of the code. It does call Google webservers, but it doesn't run Google's blobs (which is also why it's severely limited/fragile compared to packages that run them)

https://github.com/microg/GmsCore/wiki

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I see the graphene OS community says micro g downloads binaries from Google.

I did a couple minutes of looking at the micro g website, and the wiki, and I don't see anything that says they aren't downloading extra components from Google. So I'm not sure.

....

It seems I was confusing OpenG apps, which does download proprietary bits, and micro g which apparently does not download proprietary bits

The thing that comes with lineage OS by default is OpenG apps.

[–] Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You're both kinda right afaik.

MicroG reverse engineered, and re-written as much as possible from GApps libraries, from the ground up, as open source software.

These re-implementations are as light weight and privacy respecting as possible on your local device,
however the same does not count for the Google servers it communicates with (if you choose to enable them).

For SafetyNet attestation, a proprietary, isolated, DroidGuard blob is downloaded (if you choose to enable it).

[–] xep@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

I believe microG still use Google's services, at very least it connects to supl.google.com

[–] blahsay@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What they really mean is that they're having trouble reading the messages on signal so please stop

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean, any program you didn't make isn't truly secure from your POV, that's all there is to it. And since this affects their governmental employees only it's more than reasonable.

[–] blahsay@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Is that all there is to it? Signal is open source. If they wanted to be extra paranoid they could take and maintain their own branch but that's a bit silly. Building your own is almost certainly the least secure option

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


French Prime Minister Élisabeth Borne has banned widely used messaging applications WhatsApp, Telegram and Signal for ministers and their teams due to security vulnerabilities, according to a memo seen by POLITICO.

Borne set a deadline of December 8 for the government to switch to using the French app Olvid instead, which is certified by France's cybersecurity agency ANSSI.

Tchap, the government-developed secure messaging and collaboration app, launched in 2019, is also allowed.

In December, the entire government will be using [Olvid], the world's most secure instant messaging system," French digital minister Jean-Noël Barrot confirmed on X.

The government previously ordered civil servants to remove all types of social media platforms, gaming and video-streaming apps — including TikTok, CandyCrush and Netflix — from their work devices over cybersecurity and privacy concerns.

This article was updated to include details on the memo seen by POLITICO.


The original article contains 193 words, the summary contains 143 words. Saved 26%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

Aren't they already using their own version of Matrix for IM comms?

[–] trougnouf@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What's wrong with XMPP? I've been using it for many years, it's by far been the greatest experience and it has OMEMO encryption.