Please, keep pissing off the military, sounds like a FAFO-prone strategy.
Tulsi Gabbard and Director of National Intelligence, what an oxymoron.
On the other hand, Jack Smith is stuck between a rock and a hard place. Either he winds down the case, and dismiss it without prejudice, hoping to open a new trial before the statute of limitation runs down during Trump's presidency, or he asks for a stay to freeze the statute of limitation countdown, but that gives the opportunity for Trump to hire a new special counsel, resume the trial and dismiss it with prejudice, not allowing this to be tried ever again.
Estwing hammers. Not excessively expensive, but the kind of hammer you buy for life.
I think it's unintentional, I've seen times where their servers were struggling and the game was unable to check if the spot was claimed by someone, and when it fails, the game assume the spot is free, leading to duplicate use of the same spot..
I wish the verification was more robust, but then if it would fail when there's a server downtime then nobody would be able to claim a land. You don't want to block a functionally as integral as building because of an outage..
A potential solution would be to check who first claimed the land, and the user who did it first keeps it whil the others are expropriated and need to rebuild somewhere else, but then there are edge cases to consider
- if someone claimed the land while the servers were down, and someone claimed the same land while the servers were up, who has the valid claim?
The one who says they did it first with only a timestamp as the proof (maybe they set their system clock in the past to fake it), or the one who claimed it and has the proof in the servers?
Small screen, combined with poor/touch screen controls, and wanting to make money no matter what by pushing ads everywhere because no one wants to pay $10+ for a mobile software.
The only time I consider a mobile a game is when there is an ad-free option available.
The issue with politics is that you don't just have to address a problem, you also need to publicize what you did.
Maybe the dems did effectively address some problems, but they did a poor PR jobs out of it.
And therefore will be prime targets by the government to act as an identity broker for services with an online age requirement.
You don't get filthy rich by paying people a fair wage.. what a shitty world we live in.
May the leopard eats his face in Minecraft.
view more: next ›
Oh no, the consequences of my choice!