this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
616 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tuberville failed to mention that he's personally prevented hundreds of officers from being promoted because he disagrees with a 2022 Pentagon policy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 94 points 11 months ago (36 children)

This is why no Republicans should ever be allowed into office.

Ever.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 71 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

His actual complaint is:

"$114 million on diversity training, you gotta be kidding me," Tuberville said.

"We've got the weakest military that we've had in probably a year in my lifetime," he added. "Now we've got a lot of good military people, but infiltrating our military is all this wokeness and it's coming from the top, coming from Joe Biden, coming from Secretary of Defense Austin."

First, if it works, it's encouraging better decisions and increasing team effectiveness. I have no idea if the US military is doing a good job with this or not, but if they're doing it right they are building a better military way more cost effectively than one more fighter jet or whatever we would be using the money on.

But even if they're not doing the most effective form of training, it's 0.0075% of the defense budget. It's $40 per person employed by the department. That is extremely average for diversity training.

And lastly, this isn't like, new. The military has been doing diversity research and training since 1971. I'm sure Biden has some input if he wants it, he un-did a Trump ban on some training with an executive order, but I don't think the question of budgeting $90MM vs $114MM goes to "the top" at all.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 50 points 11 months ago (3 children)

"$114 million on diversity training, you gotta be kidding me," Tuberville said.

What an idiot to choose to say this.

How much has it cost the military in lawsuits and defending racism, harassment, sexual assault, and every other form of behavior that homophobes, racists, and misogynists perpetrate on those around them. How has that affected leadership, personnel readiness, quality of work? Betcha that cost is far higher than some shitty hot take on “OMG the military is soft…”

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 25 points 11 months ago

It is a mistake to assume the right wing cares about facts. They don't use words to find or describe truth. They use them for effect.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

DoD budget is $1.52 trillion btw

I think we can handle 1/10,000th of our budget being spent on not being shitty to fellow military members.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I can't believe more of Tuberville's former football players haven't came out calling out his racist bullshit, there's no way this guy wasn't this bad while he was coaching.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 60 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The purpose of conservatives preventing promotions is so tRump can install/promote his hand-picked leadership within the military when the time comes. This will allow him to use the military against U.S. citizens if/when he becomes president.

When he tried to use the military against U.S. citizens during his previous term, he was stopped by military leadership. They refused. Next time, he will have complete loyalty. Conservatives are setting the stage for him.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This is what they should be voicing in the articles and Democrats should be calling him out for it and forcing Republicans to remove him.

Because your exactly right. Not only did Trump demand the military anytime there was a protest he also wanted to do stupid shit. Like tanks driving down the white house road during one of his speeches. They stop that too.

Trump talks about how much he loath the military because they wouldn't bend to his will.

Between project 2025 and this they are making sure Donald Trump dictatorship goes through and his will or the will of the real GOP of fascism is realized. 50 years conservatives have been planning this take over and if we don't vote for Biden and he wins. Then Trump does and America is fucked.

Then it will be civil war because I will refuse to live in a country under a christofascist dictatorship run by Trump.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 months ago

Between project 2025 and this

Make no mistake, this is part of Project 2025. All Americans should be terrified of the GOP's long term plans.

If you don't know what Project 2025 is, educate yourself. We're watching our Republic die in front of our eyes.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Like tanks driving down the white house road during one of his speeches. They stop that too.

Mostly because the tanks are way too heavy for any road in DC. Seeing one crush through Pennsylvania Ave and into the metro underneath during his speech would have been even funnier than Putin and his one-tank parade.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] neanderthal@lemmy.world 54 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

The US Navy has more heavy aircraft carrier groups than the rest of world combined. The US has 11 out of 22. It also has the world's largest and most advanced air force. Old US Army equipment is working wonders for Ukraine against Russia, the supposed next best military.

Not to mention the US has a massive arsenal of working ICBMs and SLBMs.

I'm sorry, but nobody stands a snowballs chance in hell against the US military.

Regarding Iraq and Afghanistan, nation building and occupying are two different things. Kind of like ruling verses obtaining power are different.

ETA: Think about that during presidential elections.

[–] commandar@kbin.social 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The US has 11 out of 22.

This is only a partial picture.

The US has 11 supercarrier groups that individually rival the power of most nation's entire airforces. These are unrivaled by anything else in the world.

The US additionally has 9 America and Wasp class amphibious assault ships that have an airwing capability that rivals most other nations' carrier groups. The Navy plans for this force to eventually be made up of 11 America class ships.

So the reality is that the US' secondary aircraft carrier capability rivals that of the rest of the world combined. The total power disparity of the combined supercarrier and amphibious assault fleet is mind boggling.

[–] neanderthal@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What's also mind boggling is the USAF F-15 has zero combat losses and is the OLD air superiority fighter. The USAF can start operating anywhere in the world with a force larger than most other air forces in < 72 hours.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Transcendant@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You're missing the bigger picture imo. All that military might is going to be under the control of people handpicked by Trump, if he's elected and project 2025 goes to plan. Why do you think Tuberville is creating all these vacancies.

Tuberville isn't doing this for shits and giggles.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Regarding Iraq and Afghanistan, nation building and occupying are two different things. Kind of like ruling verses obtaining power are different.

Even the Taliban are having issues here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Transcendant@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago

This is the best version of the 'Eric Andre shooting someone that he then blames for being shot' meme I think I've ever, ever seen.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago (2 children)

He obviously doesn’t work for America like so many other Republicans. Fuck Alabama. Fuck Auburn too

[–] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 34 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You have to be related to Alabama to fuck it.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Goddamn I could feel the burn from this comment on the west coast.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago

This is the sort of thing that happens when you have people who proclaim that government doesn't work in that government. They say the system is broken, and hope you don't notice that they have been deliberately breaking it for years.

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 31 points 11 months ago (8 children)

This football coach from the ivy leagues has the audacity to pretend to know what military service is like without having educated himself at the bare minimum nor actually serving to provide a serious opinion on the matter.

The fact this incompetent malcontent continues to receive the support of his constituents is truly representative of how unbelievably fucked humanity is.

[–] Shadywack@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

This football coach from the ivy leagues has the audacity to pretend to know what military service is like without having educated himself at the bare minimum nor actually serving to provide a serious opinion on the matter.

I remember when McCain was the last living member of the legislative branch to have served or had family (his son) actively serving in the military. I fully agree with you, when this shitstain decided to make a remark like that, it needs brought up that he is wholly ignorant about the US military and is just parroting the party line in some kind of weak ass political jab. He's a fuckstick, and so are his voters.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Slinky5737@infosec.pub 28 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Imagine having your military undermined by a washed up football coach. I have to hope that this sentient pile of damp laundry gets what's coming to him eventually.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Bone cancer and getting blood eagled?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ExfilBravo@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Translation: Weaker = can't brain wash them into mindless murder machines like we use to be able to.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 15 points 11 months ago

Yeah, I hate those sociopaths who are all like " if you treat me with respect I'll treat you with respect."

When what they really mean is that if you treat them as an unquestioned god, they won't be as nasty as they could be.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So? It's not like Pro America Republicans will vote him out even though he's causing the United States to have the weakest military he's ever seen!

[–] AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've heard it theorized that the strategy is intended to starve the military of officers so that Trump can fill the vacancies with loyalists when he regains the White House. Essentially, it is the military equivalent of Project 2025.

It's not a bug. It's a feature.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I hate that you’re probably right.

They did not with the Scrotus, they’re doing it with the military

[–] profdc9@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Ah, the old chestnut of causing a problem, and then blaming it on someone else. Republican leadership is a Jonestown suicide cult, and they want all of us to drink the kool-aid.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Look in the mirror, asshole.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

What a sack of shit. Fuck you, Alabama.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Republican Sen. Tommy Tuberville said in a recent interview that he believes the US currently has "the weakest military that we've had in probably a year in my lifetime."

Tuberville made his comments Monday evening after Newsmax's Eric Bolling mentioned the US military's spending on diversity training.

While Tuberville piled on President Joe Biden and his administration for what he considers to be a "self-inflicted" disaster, he didn't mention the outsized role effect he's had in 2023 on the nation's defense forces.

Following the Pentagon's decision to update its policies to allow service members to get reimbursed for out-of-state expenses for abortion care, Tuberville has singlehandedly prevented hundreds of military officers from getting promoted via a vote on the Senate floor.

Senate Republicans in recent weeks have repeatedly attempted to push through more individual votes on the chamber floor, only to be prevented more than 60 times by the former football coach.

Rick Scott, Josh Hawley, Mike Lee, and JD Vance, successfully lobbied Minority Leader Mitch McConnell to oppose the resolution.


The original article contains 383 words, the summary contains 171 words. Saved 55%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Idiocracy timeline

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago

This is where Clarence the Angel shows him how much better the world would be had he never been born.

load more comments
view more: next ›