this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
104 points (93.3% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2115 readers
1 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

People claim that i cannot be communist because my family is wealthy. This argument is just stupid in many ways, its as if you told a white person he cannot be against racism because he is part of a more privileged group. The people argumenting this pile of diarrhea which they interpret as a "gotcha" moment also seem to forget that a lot of revolutionaries were from wealthy families like Friedrich Engels, Che Guevara, Fidel Castro, Marx etc. Being communist has nothing to do with your class-background but your solidarity and the willingness to commit yourself to the liberation of the working class. Having petit-bourgeois, or even bourgeois parents does not make one hypocrit, you are a hypocrit the moment you exploit workers yourself. I myself met a lot of fake-intellectuals who made this argument which made me, as a baby leftist at that time, feel really insecure about the ideas i hold but at the end no true communist cares about wealth, power, luxury or anything as such. If somebody made me the offer that if i had to live the rest in my life in a small, cold, concrede apartment with no kithcen, bedroom or toilet in return all the people would be supplied with food, clothing and shelter...i wouldnt take a second to aggree.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 71 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Always remember Zhou Enlai quote on Khrushchev when he questioned him on coming from a priviledged family while he claimed to come from peasantry.

"True but we share a similarity. Each of us is a class traitor".

Zhou Enlai go on hexbear

[–] commiewolf@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Was about to pull this up but I'm glad its well remembered on here, I like to think of it as one of the finest dunks of the 20th century.

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Definitely up there lol. I also like Marx dunk on the writer of "the philosophy of poverty", he called the critique "the poverty of philosophy" 😂 he then mentions his friendship ended after that.

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago
[–] DankZedong@lemmygrad.ml 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] MarlKarx@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 1 year ago

this cartoon captures it perfectly

[–] YoureNotAlexander@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Here are a few more similar comic panels from Matt Bors.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 53 points 1 year ago

Unless you're so performatively poor that you lack the means to meaningfully threaten capitalism whatsoever the liberals will brand you as a hypocrite.

And if you are that poor they'll just giggle and clink wine glasses as your home is crushed by tanks so billionaires can make more magic cars with the minerals under your home.

[–] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 49 points 1 year ago

They use this argument to dismiss anything you say without thinking about it.

I'm quite poor, so I get the other end of this "You're just a communist because you want to leech off of other's hard work."

They're just empty thought-terminating cliches, it doesn't matter who you are, if you're a communist, people will say stupid shit to you in order to dismiss communism without ever thinking about it.

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Often the same people who say this are the same people who think they can't talk about racism because they're white. Nothing is ever a them problem. Everything is a you problem. They don't like it when other privileged people stand with the oppressed. It makes them look bad and the cognitive dissonance is uncomfortable.

I've heard it before and I'll repeat it here: this is related to the reason why liberals hate communists so much; our very existence forcibly reminds them that their empty idealist rhetoric doesn't fill bellies, build homes, or prevent hate crimes.

Edit: I knew I'd read it recently, it was Criticalresist8, who put it like this:

They can’t reconcile the fact that they are not actually the most progressive and tolerant person in the room.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 36 points 1 year ago
[–] GaveUp@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago

It's probably because they're projecting that if their family was as wealthy as yours, they'd probably be a hardcore capitalist

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 29 points 1 year ago

If you're poor and a communist, that's just because you're incapable of bootstrapping yourself upwards and jealous of successful people very-intelligent

[–] Vampire@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When the chips are down, people normally fight for their self-interest.

The bourgeoisie fight for bourgeois interests.

Proletarians fight for labour interests.

Landlords aren't going to willingly give up their free income and comfort in exchange for a life of labour. (Maybe 1% of them will.) They might say they will from the comfort of their armchair, but I'm talking when your life, your future are on the line.

[–] WIthoutFurtherDelay@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it’s during a revolution and people are being held at gunpoint to give up their property, I would counter that an extremely large portion of wealthy people would give up their wealth without much issue at all.

[–] Giyuu@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Possibly, but then they will seek to destroy the revolution by using infiltration and fascism. The revolution is not just the fighting and seizing of the MOP - it is the continued subordination of the local bourgeoisie to the DOTP and the defense against imperialism/the international (lead by the American) bourgeoisie.

[–] Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 year ago

Indeed, although there may be some bourgeois comrades, that number would likely be much fewer than WithoutFurtherDelay's "extremely large portion"

My grandmother in Eastern Europe came from a wealthy aristocratic family but was a communist and gave up willingly all the lands and property.

45 years later corrupt anti-communist far right nationalists took power, canceled socialism and just divided it all up between themselves and their cronies…

[–] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That’s like saying you can’t be capitalist if you’re poor.

[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you can't be both capitalist (bourgeois) and poor, but you can be liberal (pro-capitalism) and poor

[–] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s true. I hang around a libs too much and get my words mixed up.

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago

I hear that. They are infectious.

[–] Rasm635u@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Except that's true

[–] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Yeah fuck those people. If they’re communists saying this then they’re only damaging the movement and should shut the fuck up for the benefit of the world in general. If they’re not and trying to “gotcha” you, they’re idiots, and should be treated as such. It’s a bad faith argument and an attempt to discount you by making you out to be a hypocrite.

When people attempt to do this to me in person I have no problem warning them that I’m prone to smacking people who piss me off.

[–] M68040@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The idea that you're obligated to show a system any gratitude just because you've benefit from it in some way (or even were shaped by it at all) is one of my least favorite parts of dealing with other people. A bizarrely deeply ingrained notion.

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Stop thinking about those people who are still dirt poor. You've got yours now so pipe down. Try to be thankful rather than ungrateful.

Absolute inversion of reality, as usual. I also detest this kind of argument.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's just a way tonpremptively discredit anybody criticizing capitalism.

Oh, you think socialism is good, well then why dont you willingly make yourself destitute, ensuring you can't have any impact on anything.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We should reclaim that gotcha. If capitalism is so equal, and hard work is such a source of pride, why don't you give everything away and start from the bottom? It's like presteiging business, think of all the pride you'll cultivate!

[–] NothingButBits@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If you are rich and a communist then you have a duty to donate to leftist movements. Don't just be a rich guy who reads leftist books to pass the time. Your funding might make a huge difference in the long run. Imagine if Engels never financed Marx.

If you don't know where to start, then I suggest you help with leftist independent media. Breakthrough News do a lot of good work.

[–] MarlKarx@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

im still 15 sadly and dont have independant money yet, if id like to donate to something i would need to ask my parent first until im 18

[–] NothingButBits@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MarlKarx@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago

but i try to educate as much people on socialism as possible and i give money to the poor whenever i can.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HaSch@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 1 year ago

If you're rich and a communist it's because you're pampered, if you're poor and a communist it's because you're jealous, and if you're middle class and a communist it's because you're lazy. We have something for everyone!

[–] duderium@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Capitalism was built with the ashes of feudalism, socialism is being built with the ashes of capitalism. All of us in the imperial core live in a capitalist society; everyone is tainted with it in some way. It’s not as though the first capitalist, when he was doing the first enclosure, looked at the land and was like “wait a minute, I’m a hypocrite since I’m using feudalism to destroy feudalism.” He didn’t care. “We will hang the capitalists with the rope that they sell us” has proven to be a pretty effective strategy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CrimsonTankie@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Anyone can be a communist, all it takes is your want to destroy capitalism and the inequality and oppression it brings, coming from rich or poor means nothing, as you said many famous marxists, including marx himself, were materially bourgeois, but they didnt oppress the proletariat and were genuine revolutionaries who actually wanted to end the oppression of the proletariat, these people were class traitors to the bourgeoisie and aided the proletariat against their class interests, calling these people anything but socialist or communist is plainly absurd to be honest.

And this is coming from someone who regularly deals with food issues.

[–] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anyone can be a communist, all it takes is your want to destroy capitalism and the inequality and oppression it brings

And read theory.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alcoholicorn@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

all it takes is your want to destroy capitalism

Someone's internal desires are irrelevant here. Someone who doesn't actually practice theory is apolitical.

marx himself, [was] materially bourgeois, but they didn't oppress the proletariat

You mean Engels. Marx was a journalist/writer. Engels owned a factory and did exploit the proletariat.

But all this is missing the point. We live under capitalism. Subjecting yourself/family to extreme poverty is not going to bring about the revolution, and will prevent you from various methods of supporting it.

[–] sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When someone pulled the "Engels was a factory owner" card on me, I did some minimal searching and found that it was his father who owned the factory, with him getting appointed to a menial desk job. But even if that's not true (and the reason I didn't search any further) is that it doesn't really matter, even if he was a hypocrite the analyses he did with Marx and the actions they propose seem valid.

[–] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Regardless of whether Engels owned the factory, @alcoholicorn@hexbear.net's point that action, not beliefs, is what makes someone a communist still stands.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bnova@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

You're only really a communist if you give me like, uhh, $20. Don't worry this goes for the poors too.

[–] sinovictorchan@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 year ago

The amount of wealth is not the sole indicator and neither is individual choice. There are the material condition, economic relation, and desire to reform the flawed capitalist system with its hypocritical command economy that allow free riding by a few spoiled manchild.

[–] Valbrandur@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I once got told that I was a hypocrite for being a communist while simultaneously using a username in english, which, I quote, "was the language of the bourgeoisie".

I thought I had seen things hit rock bottom until I got told I could not be a communist and use money at the same time.

[–] MarlKarx@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

was told something similar once: "You cAnT bE ComMUniST, YoU dOnT SpEAk RuSSiAn" ????

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you were poor they would call you jealous. Throw their criticism out, it is worth less than nothing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGC3uJadXh0

If a rich man offers you money, take it and, the next day, kill him. When he says "But I gave you the money!" respond "Why did you give me the money, you idiot?"

We live in brutal capitalism and we must brutally use it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MarlKarx@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago

oh we're not millionaires tho just saying because where i live, millionaires are considered the point where you are officially considered "rich". But the term rich has everywhere different meaning, i might be poor in Qatar but rich in South Sudan. Nothing is objective

load more comments
view more: next ›