this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
250 points (96.6% liked)

politics

18870 readers
4887 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 128 points 1 year ago (5 children)

"What is it with liberals and wanting to control every damn aspect of your life?"

Last time I checked, it was the liberals who wanted to let you smoke weed, have safe and legal abortions, physician assisted suicide, single payer healthcare, and free college tuition...

Somebody else opposed all that... 🤔 Who was it again?

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's what pisses me off about the democrats. They have the political slogans right in fucking plain view. The Republicans have basically written them for them......nothing.

Massive billboards everywhere should have this plastered: We want you to be able to smoke and grow weed, have women make their own choices, paid college tuition, single payer healthcare, medicine affordable for seniors, and WE WONT COMMIT TREASON AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION!

It's fucking bonkers.

[–] gullible@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

People already know or are utterly brainwashed. Who do attack ads convince?

[–] TommySalami@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The number of people who are politically disengaged is staggering. What better to motivate those people than to prompt some anger over an issue and hope they care about it enough to stay angry and vote. Also important to note this stuff is never done alone, there's other outreach happening at the same time. It's a numbers game, and those few disengaged folks you got fired up with a stupid ad could make or break you.

That said, I think most attack ads are damaging to political discourse by nature of demanding a concise, pithy message. Never going to get genuine criticism out of that.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It doesn't have to be an attack ad. Rebranding what it means to be a Democrat is actually a great idea. Kind of like those "Pass it on" billboards

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then why do the other side do so well when they constantly yell about nothing? Yelling really seems to work.

[–] gullible@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I always assumed senility played a part as republicans tend to be much older.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The same response can be posted to anything related to modern "conservatism".

Fascists have no shame. If they didn't have double standards they'd have none.

The propagandized are already in a bubble and refuse to accept reality. The fascist leadership can manufacture any alternate reality they want because the sheep will blindly follow.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fascists make up false accusations about their intended victims not so that you will believe them and be misled, but as an insecure show of power.

By telling lies about you and getting away with it, they convince themselves that they are stronger and more deserving than you. This is basically a way to psych themselves up to commit crimes against humanity.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Last time I checked, it was the liberals who wanted to let you smoke weed, have safe and legal abortions, physician assisted suicide, single payer healthcare, and free college tuition…

No, that's what progressives want. Liberals run on a subset of those sometimes, but then always have enough no votes to block them.

[–] teft@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Who was it again?

The Whig Party!!! /s

[–] dimath@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

"free college tuition" - like to eliminate laws mandating non-free college tuition?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Y'all saying Cruz is an idiot are giving him way too much credit. He's a lying evil sack of shit, and he knows what he's doing is wrong.

[–] sudo@lemmy.today 7 points 1 year ago

Cruz' Razor: "Never attribute to stupidity that which is adequately explained by malice."

[–] Saneless@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Yep. This is scary shit. They realized all they have to do is make their voters mad with constant lies and they'll never check it for themselves.

And he's hitting the most stupid, insecure people with things that makes them feel "manly" like meat and beer and guns. It's always those things

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He once complained on Twitter about the Paris Accords, feigning ignorance of the name while asking why we'd be a part of something all the way in Europe. The man has a Harvard (or some other noble) education. He's highly intelligent. He just knows that his constituents are under-educated and incurious about the world. He's a lying sack of shit.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Similar to senator Kennedy from Louisiana. He talks like a stupid hick, but he's a Rhodes scholar.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Nah. Maybe at one point in his life that guy was considered intelligent (among his peers), but I refuse to believe anything about that man's current behavior is put-on.

[–] d4rknusw1ld@artemis.camp 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone looks like a stroke away from voting for my butthole.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Put an [R] next to the campaign and your butthole has a fighting chance

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 1 year ago

I respect you because you are up front about literally shitting on people.

[–] Random_user@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You look like an asshole i would like to share a beer with.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The funniest part of this post is me forgetting what you were replying to and seeing this in my inbox and thinking, "What the hell did I say?"

[–] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes only the most important issues of our time being tackled by Republican politicians these days.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

Lying to persuade people to vote for them? Yes, that is the most important thing to Republicans.

[–] willsenior@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You've got to be a snowflake and a half to get triggered by a recommendation

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Imagine what these tender children will do if/when the government actually makes a recommendation and lets people know just how harmful alcohol actually is, even at the rate of 2 beers a week.

Think they are clutching their pearls and clamping their sphincters NOW, lol....

[–] Electricorchestra@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

In Canada our alcohol guidelines changed to I think two drinks a week while also saying their is no safe amount of alcohol. As a government guideline it's great. Has it changed anyone's drinking habits? Absolutely not. It's the same as a food guide really.

[–] ilex@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They have a video ad first that doesn't transition to the headlined video clip. The clip is at the bottom, and it sucks. Here's the article.

Ted Cruz rages against non-existent Biden beer limit in viral clip The Texas senator engaged in a beer-swigging on-camera stunt this week in response to a made-up federal policy limiting alcohol consumption.

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz railed against the Biden administration earlier this week for imposing a strict limit on Americans' alcohol consumption in a now-viral clip—even though no such policy exists.

The saga began when Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy asked Biden's White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre if the president planned to "limit Americans to two beers a week." Jean-Pierre, who appeared baffled by the question, laughed and declined to comment.

The question apparently came from comments made by Dr. George Koob, director of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, during an interview with the Daily Mail last week, in which Koob said the U.S. might change it's recommended weekly alcohol intake to two drinks per week. Current recommendations advise men to limit themselves to two drinks a day and women to stick to one.

For Cruz and the conservative mediasphere, however, these comments were enough to conjure the right's latest hand-wringing, they're-coming-for-your-freedoms moral panic.

"What is it with liberals that want to control every damn aspect of your life?" Cruz raged in his Newsmax interview. "Now these idiots have come out and said, 'drink two beers a week,' that's their guideline," Cruz continued, before reaching for a bottle of beer and taking a drink on camera. "Well, I've got to tell you, if they want us to drink two beers a week, frankly they can kiss my ass!"

Cruz cranked the top off a Shiner Bock beer and chucked the cap on the ground in theatrical defiance before taking a swig. Behind him, a huddle of men dressed in cowboy hats and plaid flannel shirts followed suit, drinking their beers.

On Wednesday night, the senator posted the clip on X, formerly known as Twitter, repeating his own lines from the interview in the caption for his 6.1 million followers. "What is it with liberals and wanting to control every damn aspect of your life? If they want us to drink two beers a week, frankly they can kiss my ass."

Cruz appears to have stepped up his misinformation game on X in the past few weeks: Wednesday's nonsense diatribe against a non-existent Biden beer limit comes a few days after the senator reposted misinformation about the southern border wall, presenting a Trump-era policy as a Biden-imposed change. About a week before that, Cruz shared a well-known fake image from 2011 of a shark swimming in California floodwaters.

[–] Saneless@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Comedy Central needs to have a reporter named Peter Doofy who's basically the character from Scary Movie, imitating Fox's questions

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

as someone who cut back on 3-4 drinks a week end to 2 weed gummies a week, 2 drinks a day seems insane.

[–] ilex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's because it's basically an Onion skit. Fox started a rumor and then got outraged about the rumor.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Guys, this is an opportunity!

Biden needs to immediately push for legislation limiting everyone to no more than 30 beers a day. And that everyone must breathe air and eat food.

This problem will solve itself!

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Turd Cruds is getting dementia

[–] DagonPie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wait, whats going on? Im very out of the loop with this.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Fascists are telling lies again. It's like the litterbox thing.

[–] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Ted Cruz doesn't understand the difference between recommendation and requirement.

[–] envis10n@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These damn radical lefts! They are trying to take your beer away!

/s in case someone is actually that dumb

[–] Blahaj_Blast@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago

Funny enough, it seems like all the good breweries are in liberal areas 🤷

[–] stephfinitely@artemis.camp 3 points 1 year ago

What a snowflake.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Waaaaaaaaaaaaait… I can have 2 drinks a day according to the U.S. government? Awesome.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Idiot is as idiot does.