this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
173 points (89.9% liked)

Nintendo

18418 readers
57 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date

|

Mario & Luigi: Brothership | Nov 7 Donkey Kong Country Returns HD | Jan 16, 2025 Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition | Mar 20, 2025 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
slimerancher@lemmy.world
CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.world
CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemdro.id
picandocodigo@lemmy.world
173
The Pokémon Company Announces It Will ‘Investigate’ Palworld IP And Assets (www.forbes.com)
submitted 9 months ago by Stovetop@lemmy.world to c/nintendo@lemmy.world
119 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Why would Nintendo buy something that plagiarized them? They only buy independent stuff like how they did with Super Mario Bros 2

[–] willis936@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Palworld didn't plagiarize them. This is what the kids call a nothingburger.

Obviously there are loads of similar designs, but in a way that indicates illegal asset stealing? That’s a different question, and so-called “lazy design” aping on other creations doesn’t qualify as actual theft unless it can be explicitly proven.

More grimly, it is a big corporation trying to squash an upstart competitor and suppress art. If they succeed then it is truly dystopian and a sign that we need more legal protections against overzealous copyright litigators.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I didnt k ow about this. Just read about it now. Wow. Really interesting. I want to try the Japanese super mario bros 2 now haha.

[–] discostjohn@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Doki Doki Panic!

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

From what ive read, doki doki panic was a seperate game and was reskinned to become what the western world got as super mario bros 2. Japan had a different super mario bros 2 game that was built using the original game engine.

One key difference was that in the western version mario picked up and threw enemies but in the japan game mario jumped on enemiea like in the original.

[–] discostjohn@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh no way, I didn't know that. When you said you wanted to try the Japanese Super Mario 2, I thought you were just referring to Doki Doki Panic.

Now I really want to play the Japanese Super Mario 2 as well.

[–] Joey@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The Japanese Mario 2 was released outside of Japan on the Super Nintendo in the Super Mario All-Stars game. It's known as "Super Mario Bros. The Lost Levels" on that cartridge.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

It's also tbh very much just "Super Mario Bros but more" in terms of well... Everything. If you like SMB1 and want new levels, play SMB2 Lost Levels.

[–] discostjohn@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

Oh I played that a lot as a kid. I always wondered why it was called The Lost Levels