Sloogs

joined 1 year ago
[–] Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think feeling frustrated that we're not doing enough to prevent the next set of people from having to go through this and suffer this bad is a perfectly reasonable reaction to have, actually.

[–] Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 2 months ago

When I try to think of things that would sell out quickly, clown shoes were not on my list but here we are.

[–] Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Damn beat me to it

[–] Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Are there modded clients for mobile?

[–] Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

My high school never had math competitions so I'll never know how I'd do. :(

[–] Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I didn't invent that take if you think it's strange. Ironically these interpretations of liberty originally came from European philosophers, originally Rousseau I think, so take it up with them. 🤷🏻

I don't think they were thinking about in terms of freedom from hate but more like creating social structures that enable freedoms and try to balance out everyone's rights, like the right to exist, in the face of something like hate vs eliminating any social structures and cutting out any middle man that would not allow someone to hate whichever thing and whoever they want to.

[–] Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (9 children)

I've heard it the exact opposite. Freedom to is positive freedom which tends to be a more social leftist or social liberal trait. Negative freedom (freedom from) is typically a more modern right wing or libertarian trait. But also you could have libertarian leftists or anarchists that lean more towards negative liberty, as well as fiscal conservatives that lean more towards positive liberty on social issues, so it's not fully a left/right thing.

Basically the difference is enabling people via common social framework that gives people options and social mobility vs complete non-interference by government or any other entity even if it limits options and social mobility for anyone but yourself due to their life circumstances.

Here's a quote from the Wikipedia article on positive liberty that backs up this interpretation of the to/from distinction. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_liberty):

"Erich Fromm sees the distinction between the two types of freedom emerging alongside humanity's evolution away from the instinctual activity that characterizes lower animal forms. This aspect of freedom, he argues, "is here used not in its positive sense of freedom to but in its negative sense of 'freedom from', namely freedom from instinctual determination of his actions."

I don't know that I agree with that premise but it's an example of the to/from dichotomy being used in relation to positive/negative freedom just so you know I'm not making anything up.

[–] Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Edit: Just read that this covers grades 4 - 8 so what I said doesn't apply.

Idk there are definitely some courses that I don't think could have been covered in just the allotted class time without additional practice in order to be prepared enough for the university level, particularly high school mathematics and AP Calc, and physics.

[–] Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

As related as they are, though, CS and IT are still separate disciplines so idk, as much as some CS people are struggling to find work too, I feel like CS people specializing in development isn't super relevant to the struggles of an IT person looking for IT work since only a minority of IT grads go on to become developers.

Although one way that CS grads can have an effect on IT people's employment chances I think—anecdotally, in a way that applies to my local area at least—is that fresh CS grads are preferred over fresh IT grads for IT roles, and often better paying ones. But more experience and/or having the right certifications can give anyone an edge on either side. The catch is there's usually far less people graduating with a CS degree than an IT diploma, and only a fraction of them are interested in an IT track career.

Where I'm from IT is usually a 2 year diploma at the local college, or at most an associate's degree and there wouldn't really be a path to further that academically by doing, like, a master's degree or whatever which limits the options of IT grads but also makes them less desirable I guess as the education isn't as rigorous. According to Google, other parts of the country offer a full on IT bachelor's but at that point I'd be asking why someone used that 4 years on a vocational degree that's pretty limiting instead of an academic or engineering degree. Anyone with a technical skillset can learn IT on the job, but a proper CS, CE, or SWE curriculum is difficult.

To be clear, I don't disagree with what you said it just felt disconnected from the context of IT employment.

[–] Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

Outrage is a social media staple, it's not just Lemmy.

view more: next ›