this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
209 points (92.0% liked)

Cool Guides

4057 readers
401 users here now

Rules for Posting Guides on Our Community

1. Defining a Guide Guides are comprehensive reference materials, how-tos, or comparison tables. A guide must be well-organized both in content and layout. Information should be easily accessible without unnecessary navigation. Guides can include flowcharts, step-by-step instructions, or visual references that compare different elements side by side.

2. Infographic Guidelines Infographics are permitted if they are educational and informative. They should aim to convey complex information visually and clearly. However, infographics that primarily serve as visual essays without structured guidance will be subject to removal.

3. Grey Area Moderators may use discretion when deciding to remove posts. If in doubt, message us or use downvotes for content you find inappropriate.

4. Source Attribution If you know the original source of a guide, share it in the comments to credit the creators.

5. Diverse Content To keep our community engaging, avoid saturating the feed with similar topics. Excessive posts on a single topic may be moderated to maintain diversity.

6. Verify in Comments Always check the comments for additional insights or corrections. Moderators rely on community expertise for accuracy.

Community Guidelines

By following these rules, we can maintain a diverse and informative community. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for contributing responsibly!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] burgermeister@lemm.ee 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

okay real honest question: what is the "very" augmentative / replacement for "compelling" then?

[–] burgermeister@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And what is the "very" of that?

[–] burgermeister@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago
[–] Carcel@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Or just drop very? Those are all good descriptive words by themselves, and the alternatives aren't really guaranteed to not need modification with something like very.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Apart from that, there's honestly a lot that bugs me about it. For the most part though, these are all depending on the use case and would require you to have a relative mastery of english.

A couple are...

Simple and basic can generally be interchanged with each other. There are also times when very simple means something completely different from basic. (eg. chemistry)

As someone mentioned, "very perfect" wouldn't really be used in the implied sense. It would be more used to convey extreme fragility, in that destruction happens with the slightest problem.

Another one is that you can be very open about your thoughts/feelings, but you wouldn't necessarily announce them by being transparent.

Yeah this. Deafening is only a better world than "very noisy" in very limited circumstances.

[–] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Very light implies weight. Luminous isn't very light.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

Also, desolate sounds a lot more negative than empty to me. Maybe something like "devoid of [...]" might convey more of a similar idea?

[–] SurpriZe@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Are you a linguist?

[–] ID411@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Very perfect, distinct from slightly perfect.

My English teacher would have cut off your balls.

[–] SurpriZe@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Very creative!

[–] _______@poeng.link 1 points 1 month ago

Such a very perfect comment!

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Be careful, the knife is keen!

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are actually more dangerous when tedious.

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

Are you grave?

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You could just replace "very" with "fucking" and get the same results as all the synonyms.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Or how about: " It's fuckin' BUSTLIN' in here"

[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

But then it wouldn’t be a Cool guide

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Huh. There are adverbs aside from 'litchally'?

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

akshually yes

[–] li10@feddit.uk 7 points 1 month ago

I have a compelling erection, but it is brief 😞

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

I quite like the word very tho it’s a nice word, short, honest, the kind of word you can rely on.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

Incredibly, unbearably, immeasurably, vastly, amazingly, stupidly, etc etc.

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Damn beat me to it

[–] cryoistalline@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

so you're saying very very boring is tedious...

[–] Klnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 month ago

There's so much noise in that photo, it's deafening.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago
[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

American version -

Super big

Super boring

Super noisy

Super poor

Super creative

Etc etc

[–] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“Rich” and “wealthy” are two different things. They’re not interchangeable.

[–] kionite231@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Rich = lot of money Wealthy = lot of money

What is the difference?

[–] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Ok. You know how basketball players make a lot of money? They’re rich. The guy that pays them is wealthy.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Rich is having lots of money. Wealthy is having a lot of passive income. In practice, the 2 are similar. A rich person can invest, and so become wealthy. A wealthy person is often rich. It's possible to only be 1 however. E.g. Someone with a large property portfolio would be wealthy, but not necessarily rich.

This is one of the powers of the English language. We have a ridiculous number of pseudonyms. They have similar meanings, but vary subtly. This allows us to express ideas with a lot more granularity than a lot of other languages.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Solid idea, but imperfect execution.

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ya ~~very simple~~ basic

[–] Malgas@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Image seems to have been deleted.

[–] Carcel@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Replaced with a different image now.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Thank you partybot very cool!

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

I'm just gonna throw this here because the word Lavish was used.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My headmaster once substituted one of my classes and used it to demonstrate how “get” is a really crap word and you can always replace it with a more descriptive and apt synonym.

Nowadays I just have to choke down when business people ask me to “action” things.

[–] Hootz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This must of been very tedious to make... Aww fuck whoops

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

That's very cool.

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Very interesting

[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Not-that-fun fact, years ago way before any new taxi service, during the reign of a then-popular particular word, I heard someone refer to something as “super uber strong”. Apparently neither intensifier was enough on its own