this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
465 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

58055 readers
5009 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Last week we got a letter from Elon Musk’s X. Corp threatening CCDH with legal action over our work, exposing the proliferation of hate and lies on Twitter since he became the owner. Elon Musk’s actions represent a brazen attempt to silence honest criticism and independent research in the desperate hope that he can stem the tide of negative stories and rebuild his relationship with advertisers."

[With apologies to anyone who dislikes endless Musk/Huffman spam in this community. I put it here because misusing the law to silence independent tech researchers this has wider implications.]

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarraignTheSane@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But all the Musk bros told me he's a "free speech absolutist"

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But all the Musk bros told me he’s a “free speech absolutist”

Can't you read? Lawyers for Musk are promoting free speech by threatening people with lawsuits. That's how free speech works. /s

Free speak isn’t free, it costs $8 per month.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Musk: Free for me NOT thee.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

"Absolutist," according to him, meant within the laws of whatever country it was operating in. So, 'free speech' North Korean style is something he favors.

[–] Doll_Tow_Jet-ski@kbin.social 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I recommend reading the letters. Both from X's lawyers and the amazing reply from the lawyers of the CCDH.

[–] Cabeza2000@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I read them in reverse order and indeed the answer is amazing.

As for the letter from Twitter lawyer (Spiro), it does look as it was written by someone without knowledge on the subject... I read Spiro Wikipedia page, and apparently, he is described as a quite successful lawyer, so my best guess is that some low level associate wrote it and Spiro only signed.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the recommendation, it was a great read. Twitter's letter has all the energy of a 3rd grader writing a persuasive essay against something they know they have no argument for. CCDH however didn't miss.

Reminding Twitter that if they sue, they can and will immediately request information for discovery, including Musk's communications on the matter, is one hell of a threat to end the letter with. Even Elon must have a singular brain cell to know his emails would be incredibly damning.

[–] Transcendant@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

You weren't wrong. I decided not to read the drivel from X's lawyers as we all know what they're trying to do (stifle criticism), the response is strong as fuck though.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I feel the dawning of something great. As if countless subjects suddenly looked upon the pestilent body of their Emperor and noticed that it is barren.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

That response letter is vicious

[–] Granite@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

My surprise at this development maxed out at 0.

[–] eek2121@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Nice. That response letter wasn’t exactly legalese, but was outstanding.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These truly and clearly are the actions of a lover of free speech.

[–] jayrhacker@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Makes you wonder why they would limit API access, it's almost like they don't want anyone collecting statistical information about how much garbage there is on the platform…

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I look forward to the day where Musk's do buys some consequences his bank balance can't pay for...

[–] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Never going to happen.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Free speech for me, but not for thee

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

bully only got one mode

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, I think we know now that even with the best lawyers money can buy, you can't pass off lipstick on a pig. That, or Musk's taste in lawyers is the same as his taste in design and business decisions.

[–] jiji@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Didn’t he refuse to pay Twitter lawyers that worked for Twitter to force Musk’s hand to buy Twitter? I imagine at this point his lawyer options are pretty slim based on his earned reputation.

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Free speech, huh? Only for you, Dutchie.

[–] MyDogLovesMe@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Response letter=Legal terminology for “Come at me Bro!”

2nd page talks about “batons”…