this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
117 points (76.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35904 readers
1345 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Now that we have final numbers. It appears that Harris had all the white & black support she needed for an EC victory. But Trump outright flipping Latino men and making huge gains with Latino women seems to have made all the difference.

What do you think?

First image is 2024, second is 2020.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3dogsinatrenchcoat@slrpnk.net 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

White people are so obsessed with blaming an optgroup like what about all the white guys that voted for him

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

... but he'll make my racist life better, he told me! /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 128 points 2 days ago (3 children)

After Donald Trump called every stripe of Latino, rapists and murderers, publicly, often and loudly, More Latinos voted for Donald Trump in this past election than have ever voted for any Republican candidate in any American election ever. Spin it any way you like.

[–] ___@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People keep claiming this without any context. He said a subset of those who enter illegally are the worst Mexico can throw at us. He never claimed all Latinos. This is hyperbole on repeat, and the left wonders why the right ignores everything they say about Trump.

It’s basically frustration based propaganda at this point. Don’t know if you recognize it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

I used to joke that America is a terrible place, full of narcisists, liars, and assholes.

Trump isn't the cause of this. He's just exposed how much those jokes are based on reality, and are no longer jokes.

He's brought to the forefront our worst qualities, and confirmed the fact that no matter how much progress America has made, we're all still just a bunch of racists and assholes. And this time it's not a joke. It's confirmed.

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It appears that’s what won him the election. Yes turnout was down, but the demo percentages from 2020 to 2024 are not that much different outside of Latino voters.

And I must ask? How did Trump pull this off? And would Kamala have won without the Latino rightward shift?

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Donald Trump doubled (+100%) the black vote he received in 2020. Across the board minorities saw change in putting Trump back in the big seat, as apposed to the disaster he will bring to them, and their families. People went through the pandemic, only to be hit with what's felt like the largest peacetime inflation, which was not handled by the Biden administration. Normal people don't care about economic numbers when their paying 30-50% more for milk, eggs, bread, and rent. When faced with more of the same with no real enumerated plan to get better, and back patting, they voted for different, come what may. You know which minority group didn't break right, Jews (+5% 3.5% being the margin of error).

[–] socsa@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago

Biden handled Trump's inflation expertly though. Everyone in 2021 said we would go through a recession, and we got a soft landing instead. And groceries are not 30% more expensive. They are around 15% above 2019 prices, not even that far out from historical inflation rates.

Trump won because of economic gaslighting and you and half the people on the internet still repeat these lies.

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Trump gained 2% of black men, and lost 2% of black women. He made virtually no gains with black voters.

He gained literally 1% of them. I don’t know where this narrative of trump making massive gains with black people is coming from. All the data suggest at best, a very small gain from 2020 compared to the enormous gains he received with Latinos.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because it's easy to lie to the half informed with statistics.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 26 points 1 day ago

Please be careful whenever you ask these questions. It's so easy to blame one single minority group for a widespread failure. Of course analysis of individual voting groups is legitimate, as long as you properly frame what you're doing.

This is a serious issue both because of the connection with racism (i.e., it's the Latinos' fault) and abdication of responsibility (i.e., we bear no responsibility).

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't forget all the people who voted for Biden in 2020 and didn't fucking vote in 2024

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

15 million of them. That is a staggering number.

[–] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

15 million of them. That is a staggering number.

It's also not an accurate number. The official count for Biden in 2020 was about 81.3 million (found many places online, but the official one is a good choice) and the unofficial count for Harris by AP so far is about 74.3 million. That's about 7 million, which is less than half of what you claimed.

People have got to stop just posting straight up false information. If you don't know, don't post.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It would be more appropriate to say outdated. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/11/13/20-million-votes-election-harris-trump-fact-check/76136743007/ As of November 6th 16 million less votes than the year before had been counted.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, if you said it a week ago it would be outdated. The fact that you're still saying it is what makes it false. As you point it out new information is available. You're just using old information still.

By comparison if I wrote a book in the 1600s about the medical necessity of leaching, that would be outdated today. If I wrote a book about the medical necessity of leaching in 2024 that would just be false.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 82 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I think white men and white women bear more of the blame here purely by population size.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

With how thin our election margins are, I wonder if literally just misogynists can swing the election. Would 1 in 100 Americans refuse to vote for a woman for president? I think maybe yes.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's hard to separate out the factors. Would a man have also struggled with a campaign starting so late (and doing so poorly in a previous primary). Would a white women? How can we separate out the influence of race, sex and the less than ideal running circumstances.

Given who she is, and running when she had to, she actually did pretty damn well.

Tbh looking for blame beyond Biden seems pointless to me. She has every sign of having been able to win over more people had she been prepped as the nominee from the start..

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Agreed. Despite all the nuances (which are important, too)... Judging by this table, the biggest total blame is on white men, followed by white women and latino men, though there aren't that many of them. But I feel i need to say this doesn't have anything to do with ethnicity. You could also make a chart of city vs rural areas or several other factors and you'd probably also find interesting correlations and shifts in opinion.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sygnius@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

As a data analyst, the way the two graphs are setup terribly. There's really not enough information to come up with any conclusions from the charts.

Also, first, there's not enough information from the graphs to determine the situation since it's only by percentages and not population. Second, our system is based on the winners of each state and used by the electoral votes. So overall popular vote isn't going to determine who got elected, even if the chart showed all blue for all demographics.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago

"Are we out of touch with our core voters?"

"No, it's the voters who are wrong".

This will probably be how the Democrats regroup after the loss.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 40 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Need some titles on those columns. I'm guessing red/blue are the usual party colors, but what is the 3rd?

The biggest factor really is disengagement. There where millions who where involved in 2020 that just skipped out this time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The fact that any group aside from white men voted for trumpism is the issue. The disconnect was the complicit main stream media sane washing the craziness. They put racism/homophobia/fascism on the same level as Harris' policies.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 31 points 2 days ago

Idk, white folks voting for Trump is an issue if you ask me, a white guy. Too many white folks sane washing his shit. Morning Joe went from "he's a fascist" to "let's put out differences aside". Other whities need to realize this is a grift that will likely kill your own.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I object!

White men voting for trumpism is also the issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GeorgimusPrime@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Someone pointed out that a lot of Latinos are effectively white, like Cruz and Rubio.

[–] No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Miami Cubans are absolutely convinced they're white and not immigrants. Source : 20+ years in Miami

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 21 hours ago

My Cuban ex fling used to say exactly the same thing. I wonder where he is now, and if he's changed his mind? I hope he's doing well and hasn't.

[–] CiderApplenTea@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So at what point do they become locals? Caucasian people were also immigrants at some point

Locals to where? They are by definition Latino / Hispanic and as they came from another country straight up immigrants. Kids of said born here are locals.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 18 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Your narrative is that Latinos "shifted right" but I think this is a false framing- it was the Biden/Harris administration that shifted hard right on its proposed immigration policies and it left many Latino voters feeling politically abandoned.

Look at the Democrats' 2024 immigration bill- it is deportations, immigration quotas, and building the wall - while including nothing "left of center" such as amnesty. It is literally a Trump 2016 wishlist.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 21 hours ago

? Porque no los dos?

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

wow, you answer one question about abortion by saying immigrants are rapists and suddenly people feel abandoned. tsk tsk.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 10 points 1 day ago (6 children)

So the solution to not liking the democrat shift right is to join in with the side off the scale right? I'm not following the logic there...

[–] peppers_ghost@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Why go with republican-light if the real thing exists? Catering to the center and right wing as Democrats is off-putting to basically everyone except libs

Populist messaging is popular because it acknowledges that people are suffering and offers easy "solutions" to it.

Most folks don't actually want to hear the details, they're both busy and don't fucking understand it without the benefits of a educational system that has been systemically destroyed for decades.

Trump said he'll fix the economy and blamed Biden, Harris wanted to pretend that the lines went up so things were good because she was effectively burdened as an incumbent candidate.

Harris decentivized her base of support by chasing Lucy's football of Republicans that aren't fucking fascists, going after the Cheney votes of all fucking things, Trump siphoned votes from people that don't quite know how to fix the problem but know there is a problem.

You can point to Harris's specific policies all you want, the people you need to get to the polls and vote for you don't know about them because they're boring.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

A lot of Latinos are fairly conservative people, a lot of them are strongly Catholic with all of the baggage that comes with it, etc.

Basically the only major policy reason they ever leaned towards the democrats is immigration, so with the Dems going further right on immigration it makes a lot of sense for some of them to be jumping ship

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] spaghetti_hitchens@fedia.io 20 points 2 days ago

White Dude for Harris here. I am sad face

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If that lasr column is population, latino men are 1/7 compared to white men. So the larger difference is much smaller than it appears. And how did there get to be so many more latino women than men.

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, the last column is what percentage of the vote they made up.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Ah. Similar effect in reducing the net difference

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

A functional, coherent working class policy would've ticked some of those numbers in the campaign's favor across the board without even having to divide by race or gender.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

To actually answer the post title you'd have to go state by state in the swing states to see if she could flip enough of them to make a difference. I suspect the bigger problem is still lack of turnout rather than any specific demographic.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›