zbyte64

joined 9 months ago
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 10 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

There's already a mass exodus to RedNote, and I gotta say, I love that there are no ads.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 2 weeks ago

And there's no hiding from the Children of Kali

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 19 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Climate change comes for all

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems -2 points 2 weeks ago

Go fight NBC or Twitter and lmk how that goes for you

Working on it. In the mean time, how is calling voters dumb working out?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems -5 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Ahh yes, dumb people are too stupid to make the right choices so they deserve whatever is coming to them. The important thing is that we don't blame the systems that misinform people because it's the fault of the individual for being misinformed. /s

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure, I'm on board as long as the fix isn't to cut other social safety nets.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Shit that kept me up last night:

2024: Lawyers using AI to make bad legal arguments

2025: Judges using AI to make bad legal arguments

DOGE: great news, we're using AI to get through the immigration backlog.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 2 weeks ago

Damn, I guess I'll just have to download Redbook then

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 23 points 2 weeks ago

Meanwhile ICE is racially profiling people leaving a grocer in Bakersfield.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What laws are preventing competition in the CRM space?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 26 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I mean it depends on the context of how UBI is going to get paid for. If it is funded by a wealth tax then I am on board. But that's not how the powerful proponents of UBI say it should be funded. Andrew Yang would have us take it out of Social Security to pay for it but you don't hear him say we should uncap Social Security contributions.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 13 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, because LLMs have shown they understand language and aren't bullshitting us. /s

Like I get this might generate new leads to explore, but to say it's a virtual cell as if the model is somehow self-consistent is malpractice.

view more: next ›