NaibofTabr

joined 1 year ago
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 13 points 5 hours ago

This isn't even my final form

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 6 points 5 hours ago

Is this one of those military cosplay groups like the oath keepers?

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 32 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Believe it or not, I can be concerned about both.

The difference is, the place where I live has some data privacy regulations which actually get enforced, and I have some legal recourse against organizations which mishandle my data. China does not have such regulations and I do not have any recourse against organizations based there, so my risk from them is significantly higher.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 points 6 hours ago

Instructions unclear, stuck in previous

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 51 points 19 hours ago

The most important reason for OSHA to exist is to prevent managers from cutting corners on safety. Without regulation, the companies will risk peoples' lives to save a few dollars.

"You miners don't really need dust masks, right? PPE is for sissies!"

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Does anyone remember MSN WebTV?

It technically worked.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

birdcage

chain gang

shot box

rollin' rusty

grateful tread

chained to the wheel

"grill marks, bud"

cage against the machine?

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

DPP politicians should fear for their lives.

Ah, another appeal to violence as the source of morality.

It's very funny for you to accuse anyone else of being authoritarian.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, that is not the point that was made in this comment:

Skill issue. If I wanted to have a recognized independent country I would simply win the civil war instead of losing and then hiding in America's skirt like a coward.

This comment makes very plain that the writer believes that a nation only achieves independence through military force.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub -3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

We're not talking about what is 'widely acknowledged', we are talking about what you have expressed as your personal belief. And you do have a morality problem:

Skill issue. If I wanted to have a recognized independent country I would simply win the civil war instead of losing and then hiding in America's skirt like a coward.

You believe that in order to be independent from mainland China, Taiwan should have used military force - or again, that might makes right.

You made this statement. It is not about international law, or opinio juris, or any other deflection you want to attempt. It is about what you believe justifies a nation's independence, and it is solely based on the exercise of military power.

 

cross-posted from: https://merv.news/post/130483

After the last post publicly by Naomi Wu being

“Ok for those of you that haven't figured it out I got my wings clipped and they weren't gentle about it- so there's not going to be much posting on social media anymore and only on very specific subjects. I can leave but Kaidi can't so we're just going to follow the new rules and that's that. Nothing personal if I don't like and reply like I used to. I'll be focusing on the store and the occasional video. Thanks for understanding, it was fun while it lasted”

Naomi Wu mentions briefly on her silencing and how she is not nearly as safe as she was before now that it’s obvious to the Chinese government her disappearance won’t cause an uproar of bad press making China look bad.

view more: next ›