this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
338 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59441 readers
3903 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Note: Original report by Bloomberg, article by Reuters proxied by Neuters to bypass paywall.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

This seems like a sensible consumer protection to not let the ad company control the biggest web browser. I won't hold my breath, but I'm glad they are trying something.

AWS should also be split from Amazon.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 1 points 49 minutes ago

I think this is something even Elon Musk could get behind.

[–] ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

I heard the same for Android and I was pretty supportive of the sentiment until I listened to the Android Faithful podcast episode discussing it...

If Google doesn't develop Android, nobody will. Whoever buys Android, we don't know if they will maintain the AOSP. Android has been an equal parts rollercoaster of good and bad ideas thanks to Google, but it has had someone do that...

Maybe LineageOS could take over, but that's just insane wishful thinking.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 1 points 40 minutes ago

It will never happen. But it would be a good thing for the openness of the web. More Firefox, less Chrome.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

Google: Sure, we'll sell it to anyone who pays off our Russian Govt fine.

[–] Joker@sh.itjust.works 2 points 45 minutes ago (1 children)

What Lemmy client do you use?

I am asking because it caught my attention that you didn't upvote your own comment.

Also, funny reference 😂

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 0 points 42 minutes ago

The Lemmy web client, same as Reddit, allows you to de-upvote your posts.
It feels weird to upvote your own post anyway and I don't do so unless I am asking for help and want it seen more, urgently.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They are going to ask a judge like they have no fucking balls.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 1 points 58 minutes ago (1 children)

It's called "Distribution of Power".
We should be thankful it's still here.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 2 points 53 minutes ago

Distribution of power into corporate hands. Oh, im willing to bet it is here to stay.

[–] NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org -2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Chrome isn't even developed by anyone but Google.

Oh, the DOJ is ran by idiots, my bad.

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 hour ago

What? The fact it's owned & developed by Google is the whole point

This is how the DOJ is planning to approach dismantling Google's illegal monopoly, by breaking chrome - the world's most used browser - away from them

[–] vortexal@sopuli.xyz 34 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

If this happens, I'd be interested in seeing how this effects ChromeOS. I don't use it but my mom does.

Also, if you're confused as to why ChromeOS would be effected, while it's based on Gentoo Linux, ChromeOS uses a modified version of Chrome as it's Desktop Environment.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Yes I would like to know what that means for ChromeOS and Chromebooks. If the new "Chrome" company got ChromeOS also that would be huge. But if that is not a requirement Google could just put another Chromium browser in ChromeOS. They could also continue to sell Chromebooks but based on a ChromiumOS fork.

[–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Its based on debian now :(

Depending on what version

[–] vortexal@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

According to Wikipedia, it's still based on Gentoo, it just uses Debian for running Linux applications in Crostini.

[–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 hours ago

Oh go figure, my bad :P

[–] Rogue@feddit.uk 76 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Google will bribe trump and this'll be undone immediately

[–] 0xb@lemm.ee 17 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

That would be the logical thing according to common sense and probably according to pichai a few weeks ago, but trump just nominated an anti big tech and musk friend to the FCC. musk is behind almost everybody in ai and autonomous cars so he'll definitely push to hamper all competitors.

Sure, we don't know how far would they go or how long will musk keep having white house influence and I personally think breaking up google is now off the table, but I don't think they will get off the hook too easily.

So surely a very big bribe.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 61 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Google is such a good company, one the best. Everybody says it. I was just talking to John Google the other day, and he tells me, no really he did, he tells me we're going to do amazing things together. Oogles of googles. That's what we'll sell. Everybody will know about google by this time next year. It's true.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 0 points 56 minutes ago

Username checks out

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

You forgot the unrelated rant in the middle about toasters being too dark these days or some shit.

[–] xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

And a series of words that sounds kinda like a complex sentence when you listen to it, but actually means nothing whatsoever

And he says to me... a very smart guy, Mark, he's really doing... he's really got to show... when he does things he really does them, you know, like he really does, very impressive, very modern

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

He also didn't say his name three times in 10 seconds. Then sort of fade off and vaguely look off into the distance.

They said to me Donald, Donald, they said Donald, they do amazing things, real bigly things, my father, my father, said to me Donald, they do big things Google land. Really good things.......... Yeah.......... Big things...........................

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

........I mean, you do you buddy.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago

God damnit.

[–] barkingspiders@infosec.pub 95 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Lit. It's a good ask although it's not clear what separation means here. Not going to hold my breath, the big corpos seem to usually win these kind of games.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Chrome is now owned by a separate conpany with the same major stock holders.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 33 points 11 hours ago

It's like they're a company pretending to be another company, disguised as another company. Tropic Thunder all the way down.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 54 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Chrome is now owned by a company, owned by a company, owned by another company, that is owned by Google.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 46 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

And even in the case where there is actual separation, and competition, it will only be temporary!

see history of telco consolidation after a monopoly breakup in 1984

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

Why doesn’t this have sprint?

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 hours ago

LoL they won't, even if they buy it for 1 trillion dollar

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 43 points 12 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Twitches@lemm.ee 19 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

If you're talking about edge browser, edge is chrome.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›