this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
279 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19089 readers
5277 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whithom@discuss.online 19 points 1 day ago

Trump Youth.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Why hasn't there been a push to counter the propaganda on social media with social media?

Use short form, humorous posts that integrate facts and ideas that give a different more positive take on others. I would guess there are great writers and actors that have a progressive-ish mindset that could put something like this together.

But honestly what is the reason this hasn't been done? Or if it is being done why isn't there more of a push to get it seen?

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Algorithms ensure that the only content that ends up getting to your eyes is content that you already agree with for the most part. Or content that you hate so much that you have an incurable urge to respond to it with swearing and vitriol. (or at least that's why I think TikTok keeps giving me Maple Maga bullshit)

In other words, you can put up whatever you want but thanks to modern social media, the only people who will ever see it are the people who already agree with you.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago

why I think TikTok keeps giving me Maple Maga bullshit

I mean... it shows the garbage to you, and you keep coming back..... maybe it's time to ditch tictack

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That would require ongoing funding outside of election years. These are paid for by Mercers and Kochs or the Kremlin on the right, and i don't think Gates or Cuban is too eager to fund left-wing propaganda.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is Holywood money in the world of progressive actors that could put something together but I don't know that world and how it works so I have no idea if it's something that is actually feasible.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 9 points 1 day ago

You will be surprised to learn how little money the most famous actors in Hollywood actually have, that's why they're all trying to sell vagina candles and tequila.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The Hollywood elites are full of conservatives and libertarians. The elites are the suits who finance those movies like Steven Mnuchin.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you don't control the platform, it might just be wasted efforts, although I guess they could try. But it might be that those pulling the strings can be sure that virtually no one is reached.

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It's a frustratingly true response... sigh

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

The establishment wants to stay established, so they only use their established channels, not realizing how disconnected they became.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 181 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Gen Z grew up on social media. The same that spreads the propaganda, the fake information and the toxic masculinity bullshit.

They also grew up with an impossible social economic context where they barely have any hope. Trump's making promises to make the country great again. What have they got to lose?

Why is anyone surprised?

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 84 points 1 day ago (13 children)

What have they got to lose?

Gay marriage, contraception, porn, legal divorce? Just off the top of my head.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 39 points 1 day ago

They also grew up during the pandemic so they might actually be less educated than Boomers.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a Gen-X I will never blame the later generations. Especially Gen Z and younger, if I was in their shoes I'd be livid. You bring me into this mess and then tell me it's on me to fix it? F U

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As a Gen-Xer, we got the benefit of the boomers taking almost all the air out of the room, and their parents thinking our generation was even worse than the boomers. The boomers mostly ignored us, called us slackers, etc....some time goes by and we are getting lumped in with the boomers and the "greatest generation" and getting blamed for all the problems, so that's been fun.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gen X had no future, it was all boomers until...oh, it's still boomers.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

I suppose this was aimed more at the sandwich generation, but still:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6ec_p1pdsA

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But it is nice sometimes to finally get remembered, even if it's for blame.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Well, the older generation made some of the best movies for us, so there is that. I still say Repo Man represents a moment in time and a certain age bracket in a certain location like few other movies have...

[–] BoobaAwooga@lemmynsfw.com 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People are surprised that they grew up with tech and are more susceptible to the propaganda than previous generations. People are also surprised at how vile and uncaring young men have turned into, they want to “own the libs” no matter the cost. They like seeing the pain they cause

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

they want to “own the libs” no matter the cost. They like seeing the pain they cause

I have a hard time believing this.

When you actually talk to the kind of young, Gen Z men that regularly spout right-leaning propaganda, generally speaking, you don't see people who enjoy suffering.

You see young men who are suffering themselves, but are given no outlet by society to express or fix it, and are heavily propagandized to by fascists who know that by creating arbitrary divides, (the most common one you'll see with these young men being "men vs women," think Andrew Tate type rhetoric) they can redirect the anger of these young men from systems to other individuals and groups that aren't the actual cause of their problems.

When young men are the specific, designated target of right-wing propaganda, which explicitly tries to tell them that "men used to have it better," and actively tries to make them believe that they're not strong enough, not good looking enough, and not rich enough, then of course you'll get young men that feel, in some ways justifiably, shunned.

To put it how Jason Stanley put it in his book, aptly named How Fascism Works, "Misogyny is what faces women when patriarchal expectations are left unfulfilled."

Those expectations never need to have actually been reality, but just the very expectation that they should have those things can make them feel slighted.

But remember, while these young men are angry, sad, and scared, they still don't enjoy causing pain. (I'm talking broadly of course, you'll always be able to find some crazy dudes if you look enough) They just feel like they haven't been given what they deserve.

Just like the rest of Gen Z.

The only thing that makes them different is the fact they believe the source of their suffering is a different group of people.

I'm not excusing any of their behavior or beliefs, far from it. But claiming that young men enjoy inflicting pain on others because they hold beliefs that make them feel slighted by society is just plain wrong in the vast majority of cases.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

You see young men who are suffering themselves, but are given no outlet by society to express or fix it, and are heavily propagandized to by fascists who know that by creating arbitrary divides ...

Man I cannot take another four years of "won't you think of the poor lowly Trump voters?" (this time Gen Z style). The original was cringeworthy and I doubt I'll like the sequel any better.

People have bigger problems than your average Gen Z white male Trump voter, as I'm sure they're accustomed to telling others online and in real life whom complain (when they aren't going on call of duty n-word tyraids and having discord chats with other idiots).

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 100 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Millenials appear to have been peak liberal.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

If this is true, it might explain so much of why they were so angry.

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Watching TNG reruns nightly as an 8 year old really gave me some hope for humanity’s potential.

[–] fusionsaint@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Just remember that according to the cannon timeline, the United States was rounding up people and putting them in “sanctuary districts” and in 2027 it’s the start of World War 3. Who knows, we may be right on track for that brighter future!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 day ago

We were teenagers under dubya and the iraq war. Depending on how much the country swings into actual fascism this time, gen alpha might wind up standing for general anarchism

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the ones that elected FDR 4 times have us beat

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hell I'd vote for him a fifth time, but he's mysteriously not running.

Although I suppose he wasn't running the first four times either...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its never been up to a single generation anyway

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

When the link snaps open the entire chain is broken.

It is up to every generation.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was pretty funny seeing people putting so much faith into these kids

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

The funniest one was when they thought Taylor Swift fans of all people would save democracy.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No analysis of how the older generations that turned out for Obama and Kerry went even harder for Trump than Gen Z ? Gen X went Trump by 22 percent.

Gen Z is doing their best and if you put this all on them then you're going to lose the next election too.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Depressing as it is, it's fairly typical for people to skew rightward as they get older. The problem is if Gen Z is already starting at a certain position, right now...where will they be at when they reach the age of today's boomers or Gen X/Y?

Remember: the boomers brought us the 60s. Over the years, the narrative has morphed from the boomers' parents (and reactionaries among the boomers) clucking their tongues about the 60s to: OMG, the boomers are all in for donvict, and "okay boomer" and so on. Boomer is now shorthand for Faux News and hate radio addict. Not so long ago, that target demo was the boomers' parents.

So, if it can happen to them, it is likely to happen for Gen Z, but maybe even worse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] josefo@leminal.space 0 points 17 hours ago

If you want salvation, seek Jesus. The one from Revelations, the one that crushes people and had his clothes dyed red with the blood of his enemies. He is the only one who will save you now. Riding a white horse, and sword in hand, truly the fifth horseman of apocalypse. Only he can bring justice to this doomed world.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"But that is far from a sturdy monolith. It can, and should, be easily conquered. All it takes is a platform that authentically offers something—anything—to youth voters. As they’ve proved, time and time again, they’ll listen."

Democrats: Sorry, we'll talk a big game and then just have 2 fuckwit Senators ruin everything. Don't worry though I promise next time will be the same!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They about to be thrown off mom and dads insurance and learn the hard way about the "team" they voted for.

Not to mention the fact that inflation is about to go through the roof and there will be food shortages when they start deporting migrants.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›