this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
276 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19089 readers
5277 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 100 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Millenials appear to have been peak liberal.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

If this is true, it might explain so much of why they were so angry.

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Watching TNG reruns nightly as an 8 year old really gave me some hope for humanity’s potential.

[–] fusionsaint@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Just remember that according to the cannon timeline, the United States was rounding up people and putting them in “sanctuary districts” and in 2027 it’s the start of World War 3. Who knows, we may be right on track for that brighter future!

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Same. Le sigh 😕

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 day ago

We were teenagers under dubya and the iraq war. Depending on how much the country swings into actual fascism this time, gen alpha might wind up standing for general anarchism

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the ones that elected FDR 4 times have us beat

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hell I'd vote for him a fifth time, but he's mysteriously not running.

Although I suppose he wasn't running the first four times either...

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Took me far longer than it should have to get this joke.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

First generation seen moving left as it ages and a reverse tendency might be happening with the Z men while the Z women are much more left leaning. It might also be part of why Z men seem so much farther right, the women of their generation are much farther left than women of previous generations so the division is much more clear. In truth the men might not be much further right than men of previous generations were when it comes to the policies they agree with, we just didn't pay as much attention to it back then...

Just some stuff they were talking about on the radio a few weeks ago...

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's generally the consensus, that young men are roughly as conservative as they were historically, but women are more left-wing (although maybe a bit less than expected, given recent election results).

~~Results from Reagan's 1980 election win look fairly similar: https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/how-groups-voted-1980, excepting that women and men were voting in similar ways for each age group, and bigger margins to Reagan in the older groups.~~

EDIT: Nevermind this doesn't actually show age by gender data.

Idk what that means though. Are you saying men always felt women's place was in the kitchen and now women are saying it isn't so they've moved more liberal?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sure...

"Liberal."