It is an interesting theory, for sure. Instead of countless 3-dimensional particles, you have a single (or very few) 4-dimensional objects. You can imagine it like a sheet of fabric that is our present, with everything above the sheet being the future, everything below the past. When you want to sew a thread (our electron) through the sheet, you need to pierce the fabric, but to do it again, you first need to piece it the other way, giving you a positron. You can create or destroy arbitrary many of these, but you need create or destroy one of each every time. More interestingly, it is exactly determined which two will annihilate each other, as the allegorical loop of thread gets pulled tighter and tighter until it gets pulled though the sheet. The universe would be deterministic.

I'm sure there's a myriad of contradictions to modern QM and particle physics, but it's fun to think about nonetheless

second, slightly different electron shows up

universe implodes or something

When is it my turn with the electron?

Create the parent entity electron, give it properties, then clone as needed

That's just efficient world design, guys, why make assets different if you don't gotta, yakno?

So if I can destroy 1 electron I destroy every electron?

I see, charge is a class method and not an instance method. Well played universe creator.

Don’t most sub-atomic particles have the same charge and mass? Why just electrons?

Nobody wants to covalent anymore.

Let him cook

What a boson.

We are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively.

Shouldn't be just electrons though - don't all instances of any given type of subatomic particle have the same mass and charge?

So, if route all of the electricity in my house through my body, how far can I travel in time? What about a car battery’s worth?