Comment105

joined 1 year ago
[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 26 points 17 hours ago (15 children)

Not even a joke, that's a very concise way to put the argument.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 3 points 20 hours ago

Those 15 years of experience didn't do paid video game rant writer Ian Walker any good it seems.

But I'm not surprised a man who writes slop craves slop.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Someone?

Half the country, honey.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The rats of Mordheim looked great. Made me want to play Vermintide. Still haven't, though.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Let's just call it out: Cover your body up with a look that is on the fashionable end of normal, but have a fit body ready to reveal.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You have multiple sauce cooks and they're in charge of office security?

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Sure, but sometimes Thor just says stuff.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

They should consider doing obscure 2D games instead.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

The slutterfly shall inherit the world.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

So someone who loses a lot of weight and gets really, really slutty as soon as they realize they can?

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

They really did. Even got some Doralingus & Associates vibes from some of these.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think they literally replaced the game people owned prior, and removed features.

I definitely remember that they made legal language for it so if anyone made anything like DoTA out of it again, they'd own it.

Of course, the game was rejected by the community.

Edit:

...but was plagued by bugs, a lack of features and poor design choices such as the "massive" user interface. German magazine GameStar opined that the remaster was still a good game in regards to its single-player, despite it not including the promised changes and additions, but its multiplayer features were now either worse than before or non-existent.

Player response was overwhelmingly negative. On release, the game was review-bombed by users on Metacritic, temporarily becoming the lowest score ever for a Blizzard game, before being surpassed by 2022's Diablo Immortal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warcraft_III:_Reforged#Reception

 

It is at 361,826 out of 1,000,000 signatures with the remaining trickle after the initial spike nowhere near the pace needed to hit the mark before the 31st of July 2025.

(https://www.reddit.com/r/StopKillingGames/comments/1flaevi/let_me_put_the_current_campaign_progress_into_a/)

I interpret the state of Ross Scott's SKG campaign like this:
It's pretty clear that democratically speaking, we do not object to companies arbitrarily removing access to purchased video games. Only a minority objects to it.

While it will stay up and get more signatures, there will ultimately be no follow-through to this campaign. The reality is that it's not politically sound, it's not built on a foundation of a real public desire for change. In other words, voters don't want it. You might, but most of your family and friends don't want it.

 

Because the shops don't fucking sell them, and that makes me sad for some reason.

They're just on like Temu and shit like that, usually with weirdly small black panels.

 

Too many users here prefer smaller communities and have openly stated they aren't interested in making accommodations to pursue growth to a truly large platform, even if it could be.

Lemmy is the sort of site that will linger in the background and quietly die out, it'll occassionally be mentioned in the same sorts of conversation that bring up old alternatives like voat, rare conversations with few readers.

I had some optimism at the growth spurt, but seeing what the opinions of users here were, that hope turned into cynicism. As I forgot about Lemmy, it's irrelevance was reinforced. It would be best, I think, if this foundation could replace its competitors. But I don't think it's going to happen.

I don't think you want common idiots to like the site.

 

I posted a comment with a link to an article on CNN and several links to architecture and construction websites. It seems like reddit doesn't like comments with untrusted links? Are they being subtly hidden from the thread?

If this is being done at any scale at all I wonder if it's a significant cause of the feeling that the internet has shrunk into a few main sites, linking to a recognizable relatively small selection of news and media sources.

 

Is it just random letters arrived to by keyboard mashing like a lot of federated websites seem, or is there any thought behind it?

 

It's always particularly nice and soft the first time you put it on, but the one I got most recently is so bad it leaves a thin but thorough coat of black fur on my arms when I take it off. What's the production methods used when making sweaters like this?

 

Isn't that supposed to only happen on Posts>All>New? Shouldn't Active/Hot posts require some existing engagement before appearing?

Does lemm.ee sometimes sync with federated instances, which is when new content floods en masse?

This is one of the experiences I've had that makes Lemmy feel far more janky than reddit.com/r/all

 

"help" just means "a conversation"

and that really doesn't make a difference

worse, it's like you're saying "If you have cancer, treatment is available." but what you're actually offering is a daily bowl of fairly healthy soup. you're running exaggerated, optimistic advertising.

 

It was amazing for a decade or two, but now the night scares me, I do not know what awaits us in the morning.

view more: next ›