this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
337 points (94.9% liked)

politics

19090 readers
5132 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Invishiro@midwest.social 137 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Did he think he should have married Barack?

[–] bloopernova@programming.dev 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I imagine that there's quite a few people who would marry Barack, given a chance.

[–] Lilith02@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Honestly, every time I hear him talk I forget about the war crimes. He's too charismatic!

[–] Stillhart@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure racists hate black man and white woman couples more than just about anything.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 137 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Affirmative action or not, Michelle graduated cum laude from Princeton after she got in. She had the same coursework as everyone else.

Charlie Kirk was unable to complete community college, and has no real college degree.

However, he does have a fake Honorary Doctorate from Liberty University in 2019 because he hated the libs hard enough.

[–] EnderWi99in@kbin.social 39 points 1 year ago

Yeah he's basically just projecting his own inferiority complex.

[–] haulyard@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

You just took me back to the Gangster Capitalism podcast about Liberty University. Mind blowing stuff there, and not the good kind.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/gangster-capitalism

[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

For real? What a fucking loser

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 70 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Lemmylefty@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You could show me a picture of him at anywhere from 90 to 105 percent size and I would not know if it was real or not.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brad@toad.work 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My favorite thing about Charlie Kirk is that, regardless of your political standing, nobody can tell if any still image of him actually has a correctly sized face.

My least favorite thing about him is his continued existence.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The world would be a better place had he stayed a Dick Tracy villain.

https://dicktracy.fandom.com/wiki/Little_Face

[–] BuckRowdy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

We should start a community here called c/FuckCharlieKirk

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He’s losing relevance, time to lash out for clout.

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People are slowly leaving twitter, which was his forum to rage bait. Now it's just an army of bots and idiots that agree with him. There's a reason Nazis can never keep to themselves, cuz if they did it would be like 10 people.

[–] ZooGuru@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Wow. What an absolute piece of human shit.

[–] ninekeysdown@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What an aggressive traffic cone of a human being…

[–] BenGFHC@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

You're supposed to avoid hitting traffic cones with your truck though

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did Huffpost shrink his face with photoshop or does he normally look like some kind of cursed sock puppet

[–] EnderWi99in@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

He does indeed have shrunken dumb face syndrome.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wait. Since when did we pay attention to what he says?

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

It's good to know what each side of the aisle is talking about. Sometimes it is pretty stupid, but they believe it.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

“Loud mouth community college dropout critiques cum laude Princeton grad for not being smart enough”

[–] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Did they photoshop this picture of him? His face/head seem somewhat in proportion

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GonzoVeritas@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

When Obama was elected, I remember someone telling me, "they'll never get over this, it will break their brains." They weren't wrong.

[–] YoFrodo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

haha what an idiot

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't quite understand. He feels obama should have married a white woman???

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

You're searching for reason in an array of stupid. It's not there. He's just a racist asshole doing racist asshole shit.

[–] Raphael@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (10 children)

In any decent country, this statement is reason enough for prison.

[–] Poggervania@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

“Arrest this person, they said something I don’t like!”

Dude’s a certified sexist and racist douche and deserves to be ridiculed for what he says, but I’ll defend freedom of speech. Doesn’t mean he has freedom of consequence, but he can say whatever he wants.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Laticauda@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As racist and stupid this statement is, it's not reason enough for prison. Putting people in prison for saying something mean or dumb is the exact kind of thing the GOP would want to be able to do to anyone they deem "too woke". Let's not lower ourselves to their way of thinking.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] playxdestroy@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can’t even tell whether that picture of him is photoshopped or not. He has such a weird face.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wookie_the_Ewok@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's up with that dudes face?

[–] lasagna@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Inbreeding.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The whole lawsuit that got rid of affirmative action was that unqualified white people were talking slots of East Asian Americans.

Which was true, they're called legacy admissions and in the end after this ruling these unqualified white kids will continue to get admitted in front of more than qualified Blacks, Asians, Latinos, Jews, and yes, even poor white, qualified applicants which this manchild jackass was never part of.

[–] Holodeck_Moriarty@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"lacked the brain processing power"

Wtf?! Even if he's making the argument that it should be 100% merit based, that doesn't mean the school doesn't have strict standards. She still had to be super smart to get in.

[–] EnderWi99in@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

And to graduate at the top of her class!

[–] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Pretty rich coming from a semi-sentient bobblehead, who dropped out of community college.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Everytime I see a picture of this ass hat his eyes get closer and closer together.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

Charlie Kirk looks like he's perpetually having an allergic reaction to hair dye.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"We abducted your ancestors and forced them into slave labor after we killed off the native people fair and square!"

The most pathetic bit is that modern right-wingers believe white people won so handily because white people are somehow inherently superior, when the reality is Asians invented the gunpowder that would eventually be used used to decimate, genocide, and enforce slavery in the new world.

[–] darth_tiktaalik@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah think of all the white women who were denied a chance to be attacked by GOP hacks for being married to a president they don't like.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well who cares what he says. Why do we still give this bloated windbag a platform?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›